I am totally convinced that they will release a slimmer Thunderbolt display, and I expect the display to come with USB 3.0.
However, these are my expectations, and I have no actual proof that this will happen.
I would also expect it to come with VESA mount capability. However like the current iMacs you may have to choose either a stand or a VESA mount, but not both.
I expect that they will be announced around the same time as the new Mac Pro.
Once again purely my expectations![]()
I am totally convinced that they will release a slimmer Thunderbolt display, and I expect the display to come with USB 3.0.
However, these are my expectations, and I have no actual proof that this will happen.
I would also expect it to come with VESA mount capability. However like the current iMacs you may have to choose either a stand or a VESA mount, but not both.
I expect that they will be announced around the same time as the new Mac Pro.
Once again purely my expectations![]()
This is exactly my expectations as well.
/Jim
I agree with the previous posters. A thinner Thunderbolt display that takes its design cues from the current iMacs is pretty much a given.
Of course, when is really the question. An announcement at WWDC, along with updated MacBooks, would be the most logical time. I haven't heard anything solid about a Mac Pro replacement, but again, WWDC seems like the best place to announce that as well.
Another question is the matter of ports. Will the new display pretty much keep the same ports except upgrade USB from 2 to 3, or will it see the addition of a second Thunderbolt port, loss of FireWire, or other things? Frankly, I'm not sure if Apple will keep supporting FireWire on the next-gen display. I think they would add a second Thunderbolt port and make users buy an adapter. I would, however, welcome the addition of a headphone jack on the back of the new display.
I expect it to be announced along side the new mac pro's.
And hopefully they will add USB 3.0 and HDMI similar to their MBP.
The bulge at the back isn't that bad actually i think it looks quite good when you consider the design as a whole, and the current imac is actually almost the same thickness as the previous imac at its thickest point.Apple seems obsessed with thinness, they made the rMBP, Phone 5, Pad 4 and of course the iMac thinner. I'd say the odds are high that a new ACD will be thinner as well.
My $.02, is that its ridiculous to make the iMac as thin as they did. So now you have a bulge in the back that looks ugly, even if the edges are razor thin. What's the advantage of the iMac being so thin? Its not like you move it or carry it - Its a desktop computer. I can see the case being made for the laptop, iPhone and iPad being thin but a desktop. This carries over to the ACD since this too will be just sitting on a desk, why make it so thing but have a bulbous bulge in the rear.
Apple seems obsessed with thinness, they made the rMBP, Phone 5, Pad 4 and of course the iMac thinner. I'd say the odds are high that a new ACD will be thinner as well.
My $.02, is that its ridiculous to make the iMac as thin as they did. So now you have a bulge in the back that looks ugly, even if the edges are razor thin. What's the advantage of the iMac being so thin? Its not like you move it or carry it - Its a desktop computer. I can see the case being made for the laptop, iPhone and iPad being thin but a desktop. This carries over to the ACD since this too will be just sitting on a desk, why make it so thing but have a bulbous bulge in the rear.
It seems gimmicky to me, like they're trying to sell computers based on sex appeal. Then again that seems to be their MO. It makes more sense on the notebooks, but people on here have truly weird opinions at times. Some of them refer to the 15" cmbp as lacking portability, which I find to be nonsensical given that I used to transport one regularly and a G4 powerbook prior to that. The thing that I find silliest is that they managed to make it thinner without actually decreasing its overall footprint. The glare reduction seems nice. I cannot understand why they haven't taken hints from NEC and added some amount of drift and uniformity compensation. There are a lot of functional things they could still improve with respect to display quality regardless of who makes the underlying panel.
Apple have always been about design and now that Ive is taking a bigger role at apple, its showing (a good thing to me). The change is obviously purely about a better looking design. You also can't seriously think that apple would take hints from NEC products, they are two completely different companies targeting two different customers.
Hey all,
are there any rumours about an Apple display upgrade?
BTW: I've created a fast mockup, how the next gen. display might look like.
![]()
It might even be a bit thinner than the iMac.