Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
66,298
35,333


Over the past several days, a number of analysts have raised the possibility that Apple may have some trouble meeting expectations for quarterly iPhone sales, currently pegged at about 7 million, at its earnings report scheduled for next Monday.

Yesterday, Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster noted that supply constraints on the iPhone 3GS may have hindered Apple's ability to meet customer demand. Apple had noted during its July earnings conference call that supplies of the iPhone 3GS were constrained due to robust demand, and major shortages of the device were seen in several countries well into the quarter. Ever the Apple optimist, however, Munster still expects Apple to have shipped 7.5 million iPhones during the quarter, ahead of consensus estimates.

Today's story comes from Oppenheimer & Co. analyst Yair Reiner, who claims that Apple will have a difficult time meeting iPhone sales expectations after the company implied partial quarterly sales of only 3.5 million iPhones at its "It's Only Rock and Roll" media event just three weeks before the end of the quarter.
"The first hint of trouble," he writes, "surfaced during the iPod event on Sept. 9, when Apple implied that ~3.5M phones had been sold with only 21 days left in the quarter. Subsequent checks showed the iPhone 3GS sold out in many markets. Something was clearly preventing Apple from shipping to demand… Consensus estimates imply that 3.5M phones flowed out to customers in the final weeks of 4Q09, which may be too aggressive."
Reiner's estimate of 3.5 million iPhones sold, however, appears to be based on Apple CEO Steve Jobs' announcement at the event that the company had sold a total of 30 million iPhones since its initial launch in 2007, subtracting from that number the approximately 26.4 million iPhones recorded in Apple's earnings reports for previous quarters. But a key unknown in that calculation is the accuracy of the "30 million" number given by Jobs.

Apple is known for promoting its sales milestones and flashing round numbers on its slides during presentations for maximum visual impact. Apple could very well have sold 31 million or more iPhones, but announced only 30 million for an easy-to-remember presentation visual. In addition, Apple may have purposely understated its sales numbers at the event as part of its usual strategy of underselling its performance to investors and analysts in order to temper expectations enough that the company can easily beat expectations at its quarterly earnings releases, generating continued enthusiasm and publicity for the company's stock.

Reiner notes, however, that even if Apple struggles to meet iPhone sales expectations due to supply issues, consumer demand remains robust. Consequently, any dip in Apple's stock price that would likely accompany an unexpectedly low number of reported iPhone sales for the quarter could be seen as a buying opportunity for investors looking ahead to greater iPhone sales for the current quarter as supplies finally catch up with demand.

Article Link: Will Apple Meet Quarterly iPhone Sales Expectations Next Week?
 
As long as it is close, it won't matter too much - as long as supply chain constraints are the reason.

The future-looking earnings are what drive stock prices so supply chain issues should be ironed out by the all important Oct-Dec quarter.
 
Meet expectations???

Will Apple Meet Quarterly iPhone Sales Expectations Next Week?

Who cares?? :mad: The whole "expectations" thing is laying waste to capitalism. Why can't Apple just post a profit? All of this speculation, turns an otherwise great quarter into a so-so one.

Just keep putting out innovative products that work Apple, that's my only expectation.
 
Apple may have purposely understated its sales numbers at the event as part of its usual strategy of underselling its performance to investors and analysts in order to temper expectations enough that the company can easily beat expectations at its quarterly earnings releases, generating continued enthusiasm and publicity for the company's stock.

Wouldn't that be kind of illegal? Apple already being under the investigation of SEC to further play the investors would be potentially extremely damaging for the company.
 
Hopefully they will ramp up production. I have ordered an iPhone in Belgium but from what I read you generally have to wait for about six weeks before you get it. That's a long time...
 
Wouldn't that be kind of illegal? Apple already being under the investigation of SEC to further play the investors would be potentially extremely damaging for the company.

I don't think the iPod media event numbers are something that can prosecuted. If a company got in trouble for misrepresenting themselves at media events...there would be no more companies.
 
I'm certain that the "30 million as a round number" argument is strongest here. It could have been a milestone that was passed a month before - maybe the MI hadn't been done for a while before the keynote, maybe Apple didn't want to use preliminary figures. So 30 million could have been 30 million a month earlier, so instead of it being 10 weeks into a 13 week quarter, it would have been ~6 weeks in, implying far far higher sales by the end of the quarter.
 
The quarter was over September 30th. Why are these issues coming up only 3 days before the earnings report? They didn't know this until the last minute?

I smell something fishy. Like certain analysts pulling strings and trying to get in at a lower price.
 
I have an idea...

Dear Apple,

Please allow us Apple fans to purchase an unlocked version in the US.

Yes, I will gladly throw down the 6 bills to purchase the phone - but for that price it should be unlocked.

I've already been screwed once on eBay and I'm not ready to do it again. Plus, I have no desire to jailbreak my phone, I would just prefer to use the device on T-mobile, rather than Att.

All the Best,

Loyal Apple Fan Boy
 
iPhone Sales

I believe that the 30m references the number of units in User hands since they talk about that number as in user base. The 26.4m units 'sold' includes the 2m in channel inventory. After accounting for that, the number makes more sense regarding tracking quarter sales.
 
I don't think the iPod media event numbers are something that can prosecuted. If a company got in trouble for misrepresenting themselves at media events...there would be no more companies.

If the CEO of a company releases false information with the purpose of misleading investors, as suggested in the original text, it really doesn't matter what's the title of the presentation or the event during which the information was released.
 
Wouldn't that be kind of illegal? Apple already being under the investigation of SEC to further play the investors would be potentially extremely damaging for the company.

Nothing wrong about being conservative on your numbers, provided that those 'in the know' do not use their position to make advantageous stock positions.
 
Competition from who?

The concern is Apple couldn't keep up with iPhone demand.

Well Nokia for a start - the 5800 outsold the iPhone in every market except the US and Japan where they don't have a presence. Mind you Nokia used the supply constraints angle too.

However, if the 3GS has sold less than 7 million I'll be gobsmacked.
 
I have an idea...

Dear Apple,

Please allow us Apple fans to purchase an unlocked version in the US.

Loyal Apple Fan Boy

well Apple Fan Boy, that might be possible. Once the contract with ATT is over. So you'll just have to wait (or hack at your own risk)

also, I wouldn't be worried about the iphone as much as if new computers get announced next week as well. It is possible it could happen the same day. and what will folks like Munster say if we don't get blu-ray in all machines, still use notebook cpu's, the chin is still there etc.
 
Yesterday, Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster noted that supply constraints on the iPhone 3GS may have hindered Apple's ability to meet customer demand. Apple had noted during its July earnings conference call that supplies of the iPhone 3GS were constrained due to robust demand

Something about the above made me smirk. Both Munster and Apple comment on the same thing, but Munster puts a negative spin on it, Apple puts a positive spin on it.
 
Maybe they should spread the wealth a little better. My store has WAY TOO MUCH iPhone inventory. All the stores around me have too much inventory. Maybe too much inventory in the U.S. and not abroad? Just an idea. No hard proof though.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.