That depends. If iPP is successful then yes. If the consumption heavy side says it's too big and the productivity side says iOS doesn't meet their needs and the device becomes a Mac Pro type niche product then I'm not convinced the 9.7" iPad will lag as far as technology goes. For this year I think Apple wanted the iPP to be the star of the show and since the Air 2 got all iOS 9 features there wasn't really a need to upgrade it (I use mine every day and it runs iOS 9 just fine with no lag). Also I think Apple is probably moving iPads to a cycle where they're updated every other year. I don't think there's a compelling reason to update every year.Absolutely the Pro will be fast in four years. It's the halo device now for the brand, all the other iPads will need to catch up and that will be done incrementally. Apple already decided to not change the Air 2 for this year. Apple will never let the standard iPad rival it's Pro. The Apple pecking order has changed and the standard iPad will no longer get the newest technology as it did before.
I really don' t understand what you mean.
Ipad 2 was pretty futureproof, as was the ipad mini and the 4s.
Also I think Apple is probably moving iPads to a cycle where they're updated every other year. I don't think there's a compelling reason to update every year.
The reality is that the first iPad that wasn't slow at launch was the 4. And the Air/Mini 2 is the first one with any kind staying power.
Ipad 2 was pretty futureproof, as was the ipad mini and the 4s.
The mini 4 is as fast as an air2.
Rubbish.
All iPads were fast at launch.
I don't see why Apple would restrict the air just because the pro exists. The mini 4 is as fast as an air2. Some people simply want a smaller iPad. The pro sells not because it is fast, but because it is large and agprguably more productive because of the size, plus has pencil support. When air 3 surely gets pencil support and A9X next year, iPad pro will still be larger and likely to get a processor bump.
I bet the Air stops getting an X class processor. I wouldn't be surprised if they eventually stopped doing X class processors entirely, for that matter. Once the speed gets high enough, it just doesn't matter. Clock it up a little for the bigger chassis and move on.
Possibly. Didn't they start doing X chips to support the larger resolution of the iPad vs iPhone though? So it was mostly GPU grunt for more pixels. That'll still be a requirement for iPad Air 3. Maybe iPad pro will get Y chips?
From a production point of view it could make sense for the pro to lead with a new chip - lower volumes than iPad Air/mini and iPhone will let them iron out kinks, the ramp up production the following year and let that trickle down into iPad Air and possibly iPad mini, then have the usual low end iPad Air/mini with whatever they sweep up off the floor of the processor plant.
It will get progressively slower with each new iOS. If you want it to be fast like it is in 2015, don't upgrade beyond iOS 9