Think retina display may be a little over rated . I would like crisper colors but for reading , no big difference
No.
Think retina display may be a little over rated . I would like crisper colors but for reading , no big difference
My experience nothing beats e-ink technology for reading books. Tablets are especially reflective in light and it makes it hard as hell to read.
I'm actually surprised that a device such as the Kindle Fire has Kindle in the name because as a e-book reader, it sucks.
Though to answer your question I don't think a increase in resolution (retina) is going to make it easier to read, might even make it worse. For instance, changing a desktop resolution to something higher makes everything smaller and harder to read, though it will be clearer.
If you are concerned with reading (specifically text based books) then I think a Kindle or any other e-book reader with e-ink technology is going to be your best bet. They are so cheap these days its hard to not justify getting one.
I actually disagree on the Kindle bit. I've had two Kindles and, ironically, both gave me eyestrain. The contrast isn't high enough yet that it's like reading a piece of paper. Also a pain in the rear in low or no-light conditions.
The "retina display" just packs more pixels in the same area. Appearance wise, everything will remain the same size (e.g., nothing appears "smaller" on the iPhone 4 vs. iPhone 3GS).
I actually disagree on the Kindle bit. I've had two Kindles and, ironically, both gave me eyestrain. The contrast isn't high enough yet that it's like reading a piece of paper. Also a pain in the rear in low or no-light conditions.
Amen to that I'm surprised after what 4 generations of kindles that a backlight has not even been considered.
iPad 1 and iPad 2 are both great for reading.
P.S. how do you read on a computer display then? Many are of a lower pixel density than iPad.
Amen to that I'm surprised after what 4 generations of kindles that a backlight has not even been considered.
Apple could kill off the entire ebook competition by releasing a simple 7" e-ink reader.
It would be a supplemental device like an iPod nano or shuffle.
Reading a book and working on a computer screen are two completely different things. Reading a book forces you to focus on a specific area of the screen intently, whereas your eyes dart back and forth when simply working, easily leaving the screen without truly interrupting your focus. They're note remotely the same.
What a dumb assertion. Kindle succeeds because it has the best content. Apple would be stuck with the horrible iBooks store and it would fail miserably.
As far as I know that would be impossible, that's just not how E-Ink screens work.
If you wanted to design an E-ink device with a built in light, I think it would have to be in the form of a ring of LEDs in the bezel shining onto the surface of the display.