With the advent of the new USB3 C port in the new Macbook, it appears that Apple is finally settling on a standard port. Any ideas if this will appear in the next version of the Imac 5k? Seems like it might be something worth waiting for.
i am seriously concerned they do not pull the same BS an only include 1 or 2 USB3-C ports, given they are only 5GBs.
I have finally gotten used to TB and am certainly comfortable with the magsafe chargers.
On a side note, i am hopping the next mac will have ddr5 vram for graphics, TB3, PCI 4.0. The latter 3 would perquisite the imac being based on skylake, not broadwell.
PS finally, please bring back nividia graphics.
i am seriously concerned they do not pull the same BS an only include 1 or 2 USB3-C ports, given they are only 5GBs.
I have finally gotten used to TB and am certainly comfortable with the magsafe chargers.
On a side note, i am hopping the next mac will have ddr5 vram for graphics, TB3, PCI 4.0. The latter 3 would perquisite the imac being based on skylake, not broadwell.
PS finally, please bring back nividia graphics.
Existing iMacs with dGPUs already utilize GDDR5 VRAM.
Apple used the first-gen implantation of USBC/3.1, which is restricted to 5Gb/s. The full spec USB 3.1 will be 10Gb/s.
I don't see TB going away anytime soon, because it's practically a PCIe port with a massive capability for expansion. I even use TB ports to plug in external GPUs myself.
TB3 is coming with Crystal lake with double the speed of TB2 and other features. TB3 will live along with USB-C, just like TB1/2 lives with USB 3.
i am seriously concerned they do not pull the same BS an only include 1 or 2 USB3-C ports, given they are only 5GBs.
I have finally gotten used to TB and am certainly comfortable with the magsafe chargers.
On a side note, i am hopping the next mac will have ddr5 vram for graphics, TB3, PCI 4.0. The latter 3 would perquisite the imac being based on skylake, not broadwell.
PS finally, please bring back nividia graphics.
What are the benefits of PCI 4 and why do you want them to bring nvidia graphics back?
My point exactly, Thunderbolt isn't going away. It'll just coexist.
My point exactly, Thunderbolt isn't going away. It'll just coexist.
FireWire was a completely different story. It wasn't as expandable and versatile as TB.Like Firewire.
FireWire was a completely different story. It wasn't as expandable and versatile as TB.
TB is based on PCIe, which allows a massive potential for expandability. Like adding in an external GPU, for instance.
I don't think that they would reduce the number of USB ports on the Mac. The Macbook Pro is another story and open to speculation.
M295X 4GB GDDR5 in new imac 5kExisting iMacs with dGPUs already utilize GDDR5 VRAM.
10gbs seems a step back imho,Apple used the first-gen implantation of USBC/3.1, which is restricted to 5Gb/s. The full spec USB 3.1 will be 10Gb/s.
I don't see TB going away anytime soon, because it's practically a PCIe port with a massive capability for expansion. I even use TB ports to plug in external GPUs myself.
What are the benefits of PCI 4 and why do you want them to bring nvidia graphics back?
sourcethe M290X is just a rebrand of the HD 8970M with identical performance. When compared to mobile Nvidia GPUs, the M290X performs a bit below the GeForce GTX 780M and slightly above the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680M. Therefore, almost all demanding games of 2013 will run fluently on very high details and 1080p resolution.
sourceRadeon R9 M295X is benchmarked somewhere between a GeForce GTX 780M and a 970M. For demanding games in 5K however, the performance is not enough.
Like Firewire.
There are numerous comparison-articles, editorials, and forum post dedicated to comparing the Nvidia GTX 980M vs Radeon R9 M295X GPU.
see here
You just compared a mobile GPU to a desktop GPU. Somewhat unfair I would have thought.
The R9 M290X and M295X are mobile GPUs. So are the GTX 980M series.