Will they be updating graphics with the 2017 MBP refresh?

Discussion in 'MacBook Pro' started by shadow82x, Jun 2, 2017.

  1. shadow82x macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2012
    #1
    Does anyone know or think they'll update the GPU in the high end Macbook Pro's for the 2017 refresh? Or will they be sticking with the AMD Pro 400 series?

    Here's to hoping they'll update the GPU. I find the 460 quite underwhelming currently. I'd love to see Apple move to Nvidia but I don't foresee that happening anytime soon.
     
  2. Tsigaro macrumors newbie

    Tsigaro

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2017
  3. Spink10 macrumors 601

    Spink10

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2011
    Location:
    Oklahoma
  4. MrGuder macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2012
  5. Susurs macrumors 6502

    Susurs

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2010
  6. TechZeke macrumors 68020

    TechZeke

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2012
    Location:
    Rialto, CA
    #6
    Considering the 500 series will mostly be rebadges except for the high-end Vega chips, we will most likely see a Radeon Pro 560 which would be slightly faster.

    Point is; regardless of impending update don't expect anything much better than what you have now.
     
  7. ZapNZs macrumors 68000

    ZapNZs

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2017
    #7
    They are going to dual 1080 Ti's in the 15 :cool:
     
  8. leman macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    #8
    Nvidia doesn't really have anything better in the same power bracket right now, their new cards are all high-end stuff that start at much higher TDP.
     
  9. Brookzy macrumors 68040

    Brookzy

    Joined:
    May 30, 2010
    Location:
    UK
    #9
    Precisely. Three things people forget: power, size, performance - the competition uses far too much power and generates far too much heat to have anything like the current form factor. Same with size.

    But performance is the important one because, guess what, despite the moaning we read, the current chips are actually pretty decent!

    There is a reason so many "pros" (gosh I hate that term) end up with a MacBook Pro year in year out, despite the competition always offering superior graphics: in this game of compromise, it ticks a lot of boxes.

    I wouldn't be surprised if the 2017 spec bump uses exactly the same graphics chips.
     
  10. gadgetfreaky macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2007
    #10
    I don't quite get NVidia's announcemnet on much smaller laptops and boards- i.e. bringing average for gaming laptops down from 10 pounds to 5. They've announced these are coming soon but what are the new TDPs of the chips?
     
  11. leman macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    #11
    You can find the TDP of the Max-Q cards on the notebookcheck website, im not sure how accurate those are though.
     
  12. gadgetfreaky macrumors 6502a

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2007
    #12
    the lowest TDP is 60 for the 1060. A bit too hot it seems. don't see a 1050 version for the max-q
     
  13. shadow82x thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2012
    #13
    While I do understand the TDP limitations, they could feasibly throw a Nvidia graphics chip within the MacBook chassis. Razer was able to do it with a similar form factor. Obviously with a higher tdp, greater heat, etc. it would sacrifice with battery life though. Would be nice if consumers could choose between these tradeoffs or if Apple came out with their own EGPU solution. :)
     
  14. TheOkeland macrumors member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2017
    Location:
    Aachen, Germany
    #15
    An :apple:-eGPU solution would be nice, but a general eGPU support would be even better :D

    IMO it should be possible to modify a 1050 to get it under the 60 watts.
    Would love to see the next MBP with 1050 or a general eGPU support and a Pro 560. :cool:
     
  15. ShadovvMoon macrumors 6502

    ShadovvMoon

    Joined:
    May 22, 2015
    Location:
    Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    #16
    I setup an eGPU (1080Ti) with the 2016 15-inch rMBP yesterday. Nvidia drivers are super buggy on Mac and the eGPU setup process was a nightmare on Windows, but now it works well.
     
  16. shadow82x thread starter macrumors 6502

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2012
    #17
    Interesting...so they now use the AMD 560 pro. I'm guessing it's more or less the same thing, wonder if there's any marginal performance improvements.
     
  17. doitdada macrumors 6502a

    doitdada

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    #18
    Not if you look at the desktop versions.
     
  18. jerryk macrumors 68020

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2011
    Location:
    SF Bay Area
    #19
    Thanks for posting

    Looks like about 5-9% improvement.
     
  19. leman, Jun 5, 2017
    Last edited: Jun 5, 2017

    leman macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    #20
    The Pro 560 will probably be more or less the same as the GTX 1050. Of course we'd need to wait out the actual specs. On a more important note, eGPU is now official. But it seems to be limited to Metal.

    Edit: scratch that, AMD just published the specs of the new GPUs — its basically the same 455/460 with 3% faster clocks :confused: Disappointing.
     
  20. ShadovvMoon macrumors 6502

    ShadovvMoon

    Joined:
    May 22, 2015
    Location:
    Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
    #21
    "Apps that use Metal, OpenCL, and OpenGL can now take advantage of the increased performance that external graphics processors can bring."
     
  21. doitdada macrumors 6502a

    doitdada

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2013
    #22
    Cheaper to make, slightly overclocked and rebranded with a 5 instead of a 4 :)

    I would probably wait for Cannonlake / Coffee Lake if I owned a usable computer at the moment.
     
  22. leman macrumors 604

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2008
    #23
    Thanks! Just found that part as well...
     

Share This Page