Just to have the license in my back pocket - I'll take the plunge as well. Most of my windows work at home is by way of vmware though.$39 for Pro is a better deal, and I expect I will take advantage of it.
Just to have the license in my back pocket - I'll take the plunge as well. Most of my windows work at home is by way of vmware though.
OP's link said:If you prefer to shop at a local store, a packaged DVD version of the upgrade to Windows 8 Pro will be available for $69.99 during this promotion.
This upgrade promotion for Windows 8 Pro both online and at retail runs through January 31st, 2013.
I think Microsoft may be going with this low price because they know that a lot of people are very happy with Windows 7 - it's the best version of Windows they've ever made.
That's right. I got labels backwards. They sold it as an 'upgrade' but it was always really the full version of the OS.Just going to point out Apple only has a ever sold upgrade edition. It is impossible to legally install a new version of osx on a computer that did not run a privous eligible upgrade.
That's right. I got labels backwards. They sold it as an 'upgrade' but it was always really the full version of the OS.
A very good point. Microsoft knows they will have difficulty getting people to switch from Windows 7. And if they sell both side by side for the same price, Windows 7 may still come out on top.
http://windowsteamblog.com/windows/...07/02/upgrade-to-windows-8-pro-for-39-99.aspx
Seems like a good plan - I think they will have a hard time getting people to upgrade given how well Windows 7 works for most people.
That, and Windows 8 is the central piece of MS' new tablet/xbox/laptop/desktop/cell phone ecosystem. It's the future of their company, a future they've sunk a ton of money into, and they want people to adopt into it.
Personally, I was thinking about holding off on Windows 8 because, though nicer overall, it's still pretty much a lateral upgrade. The new Start menu is neat, sure, and it is a bit faster and thinner, but there's just not a huge amount of differences between it and 7. At least not enough to pay the usual MS upgrade prices.
But for 40 bucks? Hell, I'll get two. 😀
Now just to point out, this is Upgrade ONLY. I'm sure a new copy will still go from 100-200.
Now most windows versions going for 100-200? Compared to Apple's 30?
When you buy Apple, your OS cost is built into your price, its not any cheaper than Windows.
And keep in mind, Microsoft supports their OS's for a very long time, XP is over 10 years old and they still patch and provide security updates.
Apple drops support after a couple of years. But on the other hand, they charge less to upgrade. OSX isn't any cheaper than windows.
They are gonna do this to start moving people off 7, and the price is a good incentive to do that.
They are probably including XP in the Upgrade, because a TON of people still use XP.
As pointed out before time and time again.
Apple ONLY sells upgrades to its OS.
You can not compare OSX cost to anything but windows upgrade cost. To many people confuse that little fact. OSX is only sold as an upgrade cost.
As for the low cost I see this as mostly MS trying to drive people off of XP and complete finish off XP
As pointed out before time and time again.
Apple ONLY sells upgrades to its OS.
You can not compare OSX cost to anything but windows upgrade cost. To many people confuse that little fact. OSX is only sold as an upgrade cost.
As for the low cost I see this as mostly MS trying to drive people off of XP and complete finish off XP
Regardless, people see OS X as selling for $29.99 and wonder why Windows costs $100. They don't understand that you can't install OS X on a non-Apple hardware. By the time the begin to get it - Apple marketing has persuaded them to overpay for an iMac.
Indeed, indeed. Even people who realize this still go nuts at 100 bucks for a copy of windows, I guess they don't realize how much money it takes to develop this stuff, then maintain it.
And yeah the low Cost is about XP, not so much 7.
XP is hard to ween people off of, simple because its such a great operating system. That has not only stood the test of time, but really cemented Microsoft's turnaround.
I'll actually be a little sad to see it go.
XP problem is the long turn around time. It has been showing its age though since before Vista came out. Setting up wireless network and networking XP has always been a pain and flaky at best. Problem is when XP was release most house holds were 1 computer house holds and wireless networking was still a pretty new and relatively few people really were using it. Compare that to now where almost everyone has wireless everything.
Maybe because nobody had computers?
I think we're entering an age of cheap software, due to the fact that it can be easily & efficiently distributed via the internet: A game for a handheld gaming console costed an upwards of $30, but games for modern smartphones (which have largely replaced handhelds) are considered expensive when they cost $10, $8 or even $6!
And games used to have complex storylines with sidequests, secret areas, tons of content and replayability. Now it's "Fruit ninja" style slash the fruit. What's a 10$ game on a smartphone ? An 8-bit era RPG with improved 16 bit graphics.
That, and Windows 8 is the central piece of MS' new tablet/xbox/laptop/desktop/cell phone ecosystem. It's the future of their company, a future they've sunk a ton of money into, and they want people to adopt into it.
Personally, I was thinking about holding off on Windows 8 because, though nicer overall, it's still pretty much a lateral upgrade. The new Start menu is neat, sure, and it is a bit faster and thinner, but there's just not a huge amount of differences between it and 7.
I can say the same thing about OS X upgrades. I'm slow at upgrading my Apple software and OS. I upgrade the OS due to the low price, but even prior to upgrading, I understand that there's little benefit for me to upgrade. To me, if it works, then don't "upgrade". Besides, many of Apple's free OS and software upgrades only exist to ensure that I'm still compatible with the iTunes Store so that they can continue to sell movies, music, and books to me (which I don't purchase). They're the primary benefactors of me upgrading, not me. 😉
This Windows 8 upgrade may be the same for Windows 7 users, but personally, I believe this is a bigger upgrade than Snow Leopard or Mountain Lion.
The only reason Windows users won't upgrade is because Mac users appear to be more willing to spend money than on their Macs than Windows users are for their computers. 😉 Also, uptake is slower because businesses aren't going to switch to a new OS very quickly. My hospital is still on Windows XP. It would be too costly to change OSes.
Indeed, indeed. Even people who realize this still go nuts at 100 bucks for a copy of windows, I guess they don't realize how much money it takes to develop this stuff, then maintain it.
And yeah the low Cost is about XP, not so much 7.
XP is hard to ween people off of, simple because its such a great operating system. That has not only stood the test of time, but really cemented Microsoft's turnaround.
I'll actually be a little sad to see it go.
----------
Indeed.
Though its not like a Mac guy has to much choice. I bought a 2011 iMac at the start of this year, as my work is all done on super high end Windows Workstations, and I already had my gaming tower at home, an iMac was it for me.
This might sound odd, but as much as I wanna throw my iMac out the Window for how hot the damn thing gets, and how loud it gets, I don't think I overpaid for mine, its the first Mac I've bought new snice my PMG5 Quad 2.5 ( 6 years ago )
For what I paid ( mine came out to like 1900 bucks ), its a great machine for what it is. It makes an awesome media machine and daily driver at home. I love mine, but there are times I wanna chuck it out the Window
You might to have you iMac looked at. My iMac gets hot, but I don't hear it's fans at all, same with my Mac Mini. :/
Hugh