Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

truelies

macrumors regular
Original poster
Oct 14, 2011
201
1
Are there a list of applications windows have but Mac doesn't? I need to decide if I need to install windows 7 on my macbook to overcome this.
 
Of course there are.

Instead of asking for an exhaustive list of windows only apps, why not see what apps you use or need, have OSX counterparts.
 
If you need to run Windows apps and there is no OS X version, look at the virtual machine options: VMware, Parallels, or VirtualBox.
 
Of course there are.

Instead of asking for an exhaustive list of windows only apps, why not see what apps you use or need, have OSX counterparts.

I agree with this. when i moved over to mac i just used osx as it was and as things pop up I found alternatives.
 
I agree with this. when i moved over to mac i just used osx as it was and as things pop up I found alternatives.

After you found alternatives, can you do half task on mac and half on windows? I am worried about this. Install VMWARE really cost resource.
 
After you found alternatives, can you do half task on mac and half on windows?
I think the poster meant he found OSX apps the could do the same or similar things as windows counterparts. I did the same thing.

I am worried about this. Install VMWARE really cost resource.
Then use Bootcamp. It's free and comes with every mac. It allows you dedicate some of your drive space to running Windows.
 
For me, personally? There's nothing like TortoiseSVN or Visual Studio. Most nondescript apps have an OS X equivalent though -- with the exception of GarageBand, which has nothing like it on Windows.
 
For me, personally? There's nothing like TortoiseSVN or Visual Studio. Most nondescript apps have an OS X equivalent though -- with the exception of GarageBand, which has nothing like it on Windows.

That's why I never supported Visual Studio at all, this suite was meant to work only on Windows, I moved to Java (Netbeans, Eclipse) and QT C++ which runs on MAC/Windows/Linux and couldn't be happier with them.
 
That's why I never supported Visual Studio at all, this suite was meant to work only on Windows, I moved to Java (Netbeans, Eclipse) and QT C++ which runs on MAC/Windows/Linux and couldn't be happier with them.

Don't want this to turn into a religious war but... I try to go with whatever my current platform offers natively. It runs better, and helps me NOT be exposed to another attack vector.

I don't know if this applies to other people as well, but I've come to regard Java the same way I do Flash - just steer clear of it if possible.

Of course, that's just my opinion - I'm sure that there are tons of other people that enjoy all the benefits!
 
Don't want this to turn into a religious war but... I try to go with whatever my current platform offers natively. It runs better, and helps me NOT be exposed to another attack vector.

I don't know if this applies to other people as well, but I've come to regard Java the same way I do Flash - just steer clear of it if possible.

Of course, that's just my opinion - I'm sure that there are tons of other people that enjoy all the benefits!

If you don't use Applets then there's no problem using Java, every time a security issue corcerning Java comes up the ignorant journalists blame Java, it's not Java! it's Applets the ones to blame (Applets are only part of Java technology), I use J2EE for web development and it's fine, fast and secure, Applets are obsolete technology that came with Java at the beginning and nowdays there's no reason for developers to use them not to mention the security issues that come and go from time to time, Flash is no longer needed to make rich animations web pages neither playing videos, that's what HTML5 is for. If you want to develop with native tools on a specific OS then it's fine, in my case I need to develop on cross-platform environments.
 
That's why I never supported Visual Studio at all, this suite was meant to work only on Windows, I moved to Java (Netbeans, Eclipse) and QT C++ which runs on MAC/Windows/Linux and couldn't be happier with them.

Visual studio is a big problem. If you company use it, then you can't use it on Mac without windows.
 
For me personally, it would be...

* Most of the CAD/CAM/CAE/PLM/Simulation software on the market. This includes SolidWorks, SolidEdge, CATIA (although it has a unix server component), Creo Elements/Pro, PowerShape/PowerMill/etc, Mathcad...

* The "real" Office versions – Office for Mac is of course far superior to iWork, but still doesn't hold a candle to Office 2013 or even 2010. Most of the Excel documents used by the finance sector would make Excel 2011 crash.
 
For 3D work, 3DS Max only supports Windows. Can't run that well in a VM at all.
 
windows applications mac can't do?

I think I still need to install win7 on MacBook. So I only need to bring one laptop when go out. Which way is a better solution to install win7 on Mac?
 
[...] Flash is no longer needed to make rich animations web pages neither playing videos, that's what HTML5 is for. If you want to develop with native tools on a specific OS then it's fine, in my case I need to develop on cross-platform environments.

As a web developer myself... that's also what HTML (5 or earlier) is for ;) It's completely platform agnostic and does not have any dependency on the underlying system.

As for applets ... I do have a technical background, and I am a developer currently (not involved in Java at all though), and I don't know the difference. I can guarantee you that neither do 99% of your target audience :(
 
Visual Studio 2013 is a beauty.

I just started using 2013 yesterday. I do like it, of course I liked 2012 as well.

----------

I think I still need to install win7 on MacBook. So I only need to bring one laptop when go out. Which way is a better solution to install win7 on Mac?

I tried both parallels and bootcamp. I like running windows in bootcamp better.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.