Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Windows PC Industry Reacts to Apple's Most Affordable MacBook Ever

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster


A few months ago, Apple released the MacBook Neo, its most affordable MacBook ever. At the time, an ASUS executive admitted that the laptop came as a "shock" to the Windows PC industry, which is now in the process of responding.

macbook-neo-product-film-feature.jpg

Acer today introduced a Swift Air 14 laptop, with U.S. pricing starting at $699. By comparison, the MacBook Neo starts at $599 with a 256GB SSD and 8GB of RAM, or at $499 for college students and educational staff. However, the MacBook Neo costs an equal $699 when configured with a doubled 512GB of storage and a Touch ID button.

Powered by a new Intel Core Series 3 processor, the Swift Air 14 features a 14-inch display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a resolution of 1,920 × 1,200 pixels, up to a 512GB SSD, up to 16GB of RAM, an all-aluminum enclosure, and quad speakers with DTS:X Ultra audio. Like the MacBook Neo, the laptop supports Wi-Fi 6E.

Acer-Swift-Air-14.jpg
Acer's Swift Air 14​

The laptop is equipped with two Thunderbolt 4 ports, a USB-A port, and a 3.5mm headphone jack, and Acer says a 70 Wh battery provides up to 19 hours of battery life for video playback and up to 16 hours of battery life for web browsing.

Like the MacBook Neo, the Swift Air 14 is available in colorful finishes, including sage green, frost blue, blossom pink, and lilac purple.

Acer said the Swift Air 14 will be available in North America starting in August.

Meanwhile, Qualcomm this week announced the Snapdragon C, a new processor designed for "entry-tier laptops" priced at "$300 and up." Qualcomm said the processor delivers "responsive everyday performance" with "breakthrough power efficiency." The first laptops powered by the Snapdragon C are expected to launch later this year, with committed brands including Acer, HP, and Lenovo, according to Qualcomm.

Qualcomm-Snapdragon-C.jpg
Qualcomm's Snapdragon C processor​

Indeed, Acer has previewed the Aspire Go 15, the first laptop powered by the Snapdragon C processor. The laptop will have an "affordable" price point, but Acer did not provide specific pricing or a release date. Key specs include a 15.6-inch display with a resolution of 1,920 × 1,080 pixels, up to a 512GB SSD, up to 8GB of RAM, a 1080p webcam, two speakers, two USB-C ports, one USB-A port, one HDMI port, and a 3.5mm headphone jack.

Acer said the Aspire Go 15 is made from 100% recyclable materials and has some components made from recycled plastic, so it sounds like the laptop will not have an all-aluminum enclosure like the MacBook Neo and the Swift Air 14.

Finally, ASUS commented on the MacBook Neo again during its annual shareholders meeting today. According to Taiwan's Economic Daily News, ASUS's chairman Jonney Shih said that the company can learn from Apple's cost-efficient strategy with the MacBook Neo and views it as an opportunity. Stay tuned, he said.

On an earnings call last month, Apple's CEO Tim Cook said that customer response to the MacBook Neo had been "off the charts" since its launch.

Apple was very optimistic about the MacBook Neo before announcing it, but the company still "undercalled" the level of enthusiasm that the laptop would generate, according to Cook. He said that MacBook Neo demand exceeded Apple's expectations and helped to drive a record number of first-time Mac buyers last quarter.

"We could not be happier with how things are going at the moment," said Cook.

As for the Windows PC industry, perhaps not so much.

Article Link: Windows PC Industry Reacts to Apple's Most Affordable MacBook Ever
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2026/05/29/windows-pc-industry-reacts-to-macbook-neo/
"Acer says a 70 Wh battery provides up to 19 hours of battery life for video playback and up to 16 hours of battery life for web browsing."

Up to 19 hours for video playback but only 16 for web browsing? That doesn't make sense. Wouldn't online video be more demanding than general browsing? Also, I seriously doubt that thing will have more battery life than the Neo with an Intel chip, unless it's so underpowered you can only do 1 thing at a time.
 
With the memory constraints and prices I think it’s going to be a tough hall for windows laptops at this price. Can’t just throw cheap memory at this to make perform better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: djphat2000 and KeithBN
boswald said:
"Acer says a 70 Wh battery provides up to 19 hours of battery life for video playback and up to 16 hours of battery life for web browsing."

Up to 19 hours for video playback but only 16 for web browsing? That doesn't make sense. Wouldn't online video be more demanding than general browsing?
Click to expand...
video playback ≠ online video

video could be stored on drive

Unfortunately, Acer doesn't specify what "specific test settings" were used for video playback

• Battery life of Acer Swift Air 14 (SFA14-I31) with 70Wh battery was measured under specific test settings resulting in 19 hours under a video playback scenario, 16 hours under a web browsing scenario, and 12 hours pursuant to MobileMark30 testing. Actual battery life may vary considerably by specifications, depending on product model, configuration, applications, power management settings, operating conditions, and features utilized. Performance variation also arises based on components in use, which includes but is not limited to the processor, RAM capacity, storage, display, resolution, etc.
 
boswald said:
"Acer says a 70 Wh battery provides up to 19 hours of battery life for video playback and up to 16 hours of battery life for web browsing."

Up to 19 hours for video playback but only 16 for web browsing? That doesn't make sense. Wouldn't online video be more demanding than general browsing? Also, I seriously doubt that thing will have more battery life than the Neo with an Intel chip, unless it's so underpowered you can only do 1 thing at a time.
Click to expand...
who says it's streaming....local playback is probably the test.


Side note: Amazing how fast they ripped off the design, yet less powerful and more expensive. Never though I'd be able to say a MacBook was cheaper then the Windows alternative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Timpetus
sw1tcher said:
video playback ≠ online video

video could be stored on drive
Click to expand...
Technically you're correct, but I consider them one and the same. Either way, you're watching videos. Maybe the encoders are different? I don't know. But I seriously doubt this thing's capability until I see it in person. Fool me once, shame on you...
 
sw1tcher said:
video playback ≠ online video

video could be stored on drive
Click to expand...
This is true, and they don’t make it clear which one they are using.
But either way, I think the point remains. Watching YouTube or any streaming service on my phone/iPad is way more efficient than the vast majority of websites, which instantly start clogging all resources.
 
fenderbass146 said:
who says it's streaming....local playback is probably the test.


Side note: Amazing how fast they ripped off the design, yet less powerful and more expensive. Never though I'd be able to say a MacBook was cheaper then the Windows alternative.
Click to expand...
Yes, that could very well be. But who watches that much local content? I'm old so I don't get it.
 
boswald said:
"Acer says a 70 Wh battery provides up to 19 hours of battery life for video playback and up to 16 hours of battery life for web browsing."

Up to 19 hours for video playback but only 16 for web browsing? That doesn't make sense. Wouldn't online video be more demanding than general browsing? Also, I seriously doubt that thing will have more battery life than the Neo with an Intel chip, unless it's so underpowered you can only do 1 thing at a time.
Click to expand...
in windows world, you have to cut in half
 
This laptop will:

A) have a screen that wobbles for 30 seconds after you touch the keyboard
B) be able to heat your bedroom in the winter
C) Sound like a jet taking off
D) have such bad speakers that you’ll need subtitles on all your videos
E) all of the above
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: boswald, addamas, Huck and 4 others
Well, without the Neo, I don’t think we would be seeing a laptop like this at all in this price range. So I’m glad windows is trying to step up and offer something more compelling in this price range to try and compete. 120hz 100% srgb display, all aluminum build, thunderbolt 4, fast charging etc. Not something you commonly see in this price range in windows.

Also proves they could have been offering up something like this a long time ago. Especially with the way the market is now, where were these offerings the last few years when components were dirt cheap?

Better late than never I guess lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: onebigappleturnover
1920x1080 is too low for a 14” laptop. At 1x scaling, everything is small. At 2x scaling, everything is way too big (effectively 960x540). You’re basically stuck doing fractional scaling at 125% to 150%, which is not ideal. Back in the day these would have native 1280x800 or 1440x900 displays. Low res yes, but crisp and 1:1.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stevez67
No matter what, no matter how, no matter where... those "computers" (highly fragmented, irresponsible software quality control if any, 10 dad's machines) will never offer macOS premium integrated experience, why? Because it's running microslop's WINDOWS.
 
Shalev Lazarof said:
No matter what, no matter how, no matter where... those "computers" (highly fragmented, irresponsible, 10 dad's machines) will never offer macOS premium integrated experience, why? Because it's running microslop's WINDOWS.
Click to expand...
Say what you want about Windows, and I agree partly of your point, File Explorer is simply better than Finder tbh. And this is coming from someone who uses both macOS and Windows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CalMin
As others have stated, I think the biggest issue with this laptop here is that it runs Windows, which is currently a mess.

It's no longer possible for me to recommend in good conscience that someone buy a Windows laptop at this price point over a MacBook Neo. The Neo has it's shortcomings for sure, but as an everyday laptop for people looking for a computer that can do email, light MS Office work, family photos, YouTube etc.. it's hard to beat.
 
AppleTO said:
1920x1080 is too low for a 14” laptop. At 1x scaling, everything is way small. At 2x scaling, everything is too big. You’re basically stuck doing fractional scaling at 125% to 150%, which is not ideal.
Click to expand...
Might not be ideal, but on Windows, 125% to 150% works great. I use a 43" 4K monitor, and I have my Windows 11 scaling set to 150%, and it looks great. Has done for years and everything scales great. It's not too big, and it's not too small.
 
vertsix said:
Say what you want about Windows, and I agree partly of your point, File Explorer is simply better than Finder tbh. And this is coming from someone who uses both macOS and Windows.
Click to expand...

As a long time user of both platforms, I have to agree that Finder falls short in some areas vs. File Explorer. For us PowerUsers that's important, but for the typical Neo purchaser it's not going to be. No matter how good the file system, my wife is STILL never going to be able to find 'that letter she wrote last month'.
 
Speak to anyone who works in IT sales and they’ll tell you Acer are the least reliable PC manufacturer on the planet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back