I don't understand how this is anything they couldn't do on a computer before.
This is just rude in my eyes, an insult to long term subscribers and a backwards business model.
Well that looks very slick - can't wait to see what other magazines bring to the table, um, iPad.
But the price...$4.99/£3.50? A little bit outside of the sweet spot to make it a monthly purchase IMHO. If if was nearer £2 (approx $2.90) I'd maybe buy it some months, even cheaper and it would be a regular purchase...
Pfft. I could browse photos on paper.Totally! iPads are useless. I mean one could browse photos on a computer before!
/s
Good god people are impatient these days...
Look, everything we've seen to date in terms of magazine and newspaper applications are very much version 1 and that includes pricing. Even now these publications have no idea what their potential readership is on these devices, how best to reach people, what prices people will or won't pay etc. If you're going to invest in producing an application and content then you're going to try to make damn sure that the first version pays for itself while you (and everyone else) gets some market data on which to base future plans. Certainly no-one is going to do anything that may damage or even destroy their business model if it takes off so you can expect caution from the establishment.
Subscription services, combined subscriptions, ad-supported models and much more besides will come in time. But do try to consider that these companies are taking their first steps into this world and there WILL need to be a few goes at this until someone gets it right and once they do everyone else will follow.
...
Good god people are impatient these days...
Look, everything we've seen to date in terms of magazine and newspaper applications are very much version 1 and that includes pricing. Even now these publications have no idea what their potential readership is on these devices, how best to reach people, what prices people will or won't pay etc. If you're going to invest in producing an application and content then you're going to try to make damn sure that the first version pays for itself while you (and everyone else) gets some market data on which to base future plans. Certainly no-one is going to do anything that may damage or even destroy their business model if it takes off so you can expect caution from the establishment.
Subscription services, combined subscriptions, ad-supported models and much more besides will come in time. But do try to consider that these companies are taking their first steps into this world and there WILL need to be a few goes at this until someone gets it right and once they do everyone else will follow.
Personally I'd say it's more than likely that breakthrough will come from an independent newcomer to the scene. A few friends with the relevant skills (graphics design, journalist, developer) coming together to produce... uh, I guess it'd be a cross between magazine and blog at a very low price with minimal overheads. Again though, all that takes time and we'll just have to see what happens but patience may be a virtue worth exploring.
I'm not one to complain about app prices, but it does seem strange they are charging for it. I mean it has a bunch of ads in it as well. You'd think they'd go for a larger readership.
arn
I don't understand how this is anything they couldn't do on a computer before.
They also own Omniture since last fall.This looks like Adobe is thinking about a bigger picture than just Flash Player, and I'm pretty happy that you posted that link![]()
iPad Wired Mag isn't a copy and paste version of the paper magazine like GQ and Vanity Fair... This cost them money to develop and will cost money to do monthly issues just as it does paper version. With this version of Wired, YOU'LL NEVER GET THIS EXPERIENCE IN THE PAPER VERSION...
I'm sure and confident we'll see a digital subscription soon and they'll probably merge it with the paper subscription. I know Time and Popular Science is planning on doing this. SO IF YOU DON'T LIKE TO PAY $5 THEN WAIT FOR THE SUBSCRIPTION OPTION. It won't be sooner than you think but it will come eventually.
Adobe makes nothing from content viewers such as Flash. They earn all their money developing content creation tools, such as, er, Flash.
This is starting to frustrate me now.
Why now, as a subscriber, am I expected to pay for the means of delivery, AS WELL AS pay again for the same content, albiet with some moving images.
Conde Nast have an opportunity to totally corner the magazine market while slash their delivery costs. They should be writing me to me saying "Hi, here's a choice for you. You can continue to receive your magazine subscription via post as normal - or we'll send you an iPad for free and you can move to our digital subscription. Or pay £2 extra for postage and get both. Your call".
Instead I get - "Hey, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE drop 500 notes on a delivery device so we can charge you twice for the same content, expose you to more of other magazines, show you more adverts and make you pay double. You have to, because, like, we're all in trouble if you don't."
This is just rude in my eyes, an insult to long term subscribers and a backwards business model.
f
They also invented Postscript and the Portable Document Format (PDF, created with Adobe Acrobat) - you know, those technologies that are built deeply into NeXTstep (Display Postscript) and now Mac OS X (PDF).
Very beautiful, pretty crazy though that it's bigger than half a gig (527 MBs). Seriously, think about it, that's the size of 5 or 6 albums with a good quality rip.
And on a side note... it's BS that they expect people to actually pay full retail for this... they are encouraging piracy.
This is starting to frustrate me now.
Conde Nast have an opportunity to totally corner the magazine market while slash their delivery costs. They should be writing me to me saying "Hi, here's a choice for you. You can continue to receive your magazine subscription via post as normal - or we'll send you an iPad for free and you can move to our digital subscription. Or pay £2 extra for postage and get both. Your call".
Instead I get - "Hey, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE drop 500 notes on a delivery device so we can charge you twice for the same content, expose you to more of other magazines, show you more adverts and make you pay double. You have to, because, like, we're all in trouble if you don't."
This is just rude in my eyes, an insult to long term subscribers and a backwards business model.
f
does anyone know what song that is????