A great piece by Wired's Mat Honan:
http://wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/09/the-iphone-5-is-boring-and-amazing
http://wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/09/the-iphone-5-is-boring-and-amazing
A great piece by Wired's Mat Honan:
http://wired.com/gadgetlab/2012/09/the-iphone-5-is-boring-and-amazing
I really wish this " it's boring" BS would go away. Personally I'd be pretty excited if I could justify spending $1k on my first iPhone.
I wonder if apple really is tired of the copycats, as pointed out in the article. If so, then apple doesn't have the motivation to create a radical new design. Why should they? It'll just be copied by samsung and the usual suspects.
The Mini had a worthy replacement - the flash-based iPod Nano - and it was likely that favorable price points for flash memory were a driving force in the new product. But why not milk it? The Mini had been on the market a year and a half and Apple was still having difficulty keeping the Mini in stock. Why kill a best-selling product? I think the reason, and, more importantly, an emerging Apple strategy, was announced as part of the keynote. Steve spent multiple slides showing off the Minis competition, and, not surprisingly, it looked a lot like the Mini. So rather than letting them catch up, he changed the game.
If there was ever a moment where Steve Jobs tipped his hand regarding what drives him, it was this moment.
I wonder if apple really is tired of the copycats, as pointed out in the article. If so, then apple doesn't have the motivation to create a radical new design. Why should they? It'll just be copied by samsung and the usual suspects.