How do you even know the cop forced the iPod trade? He may have threatened arrest unless some bartering took place and she may have picked the iPod as the only portable valuable that the cab driver would agree that has value at least equal to the fare. If that is the case, I see no problem.
Officers allegedly forced iPod paymentShe was told to give driver compensation. Not at gun point. Not "give the driver the ipod at gun point" that some backseat lawyer wannabe are speculating. She could have gave the correct amount in cash but didn't. The woman turned over the iPod. Settle it in court instead of taking collateral? It typically takes $40 to file something with court, before the cost of lawyers.
NEW YORK, Jan. 21 (UPI) -- A New York cabbie says he wants to return an iPod Nano he claims uniformed airport officers forced him to accept as a fare. Mohammed Islam said he wants to return the iPod Nano to Natalie Lenhart of Sacramento under the supervision of a Taxi and Limousine Commission official, the New York Post reported Wednesday. The driver said he called 911 after Lenhart swiped her payment card 20 times in the taxi cab at John F. Kennedy International Airport but was rejected each time. Islam and Lenhart both said Port Authority officers responded and told Lenhart she "had to give the driver some compensation" if she did not have money for the fare and forced her to surrender her iPod Nano, which Lenhart said was worth about $90 more than the fare plus tip. Islam said he wants to trade the music player for the amount of the original fare. "What am I going to do with the iPod? There's no ear phones," he said. The New York Port Authority said the incident is under investigation. "As of now, we have no evidence of any wrongdoing" the Port Authority said in a written statement. "However, this is against our policy if it happened as reported, and we will investigate and take appropriate action if it's found that someone didn't follow proper procedures."
Just short of having the police report in front of me; or personally witnessing the incident, my opinion is all I can offer based upon news accounts. Additionally, a misdemeanor committed "not-in-the-presence" of a police officer requires a Citizen's Arrest. Again, IMHO...