Originally posted by edesignuk
Quite...utterly ridiculous![]()
Originally posted by celaurie
Imagine what would happen if people sued British TV companies for flesh showing... There'd be nuffink to watch.
![]()
heh, and channel 5 wouldn't even exist!Originally posted by celaurie
Imagine what would happen if people sued British TV companies for flesh showing... There'd be nuffink to watch.
![]()
Originally posted by edesignuk
heh, and channel 5 wouldn't even exist!![]()
![]()
![]()
It's not like she's got a nice one either. Generally she's a bit of a minger....Originally posted by WinterMute
Does that mean I can sue Jordan for getting her arse out on the 6 O'clock news yesterday?
witness the furore over this, the apparent willingness to bomb people in other countries and the execution of murderers. We'll be seeing them reintroduce the burning of witches and the stoning of gay people next...
Originally posted by caveman_uk
It's not like she's got a nice one either. Generally she's a bit of a minger....![]()
He pulled a bit of someone's clothing off... hardly violence. If he'd punched her then you'd have a point. We had an entry in the Eurovision song contest in the 80's where the two guys pulled the skirts off the two girls. Admittedly they had something on underneath.Originally posted by wdlove
The naked breast isn't the real issue. The real issue is the Justin Timberlake performed violence on a women. It gives the wrong idea to young boys and men, that that kind of abuse of a female is OK!
Originally posted by wdlove
The naked breast isn't the real issue. The real issue is the Justin Timberlake performed violence on a women. It gives the wrong idea to young boys and men, that that kind of abuse of a female is OK!
The real beneficiary of this lawsuit will be the lawyers. In the end as usual all of us will pay.