Lol thats true, michael is one scary looking something or other. but least we now know Michael isnt Janet.
Originally posted by Dont Hurt Me
this was poor judgement on cbs even having mtv involved and i hope the fcc levels fines on cbs.
I can't see why the Yanks are getting soooo worked up about a bit of flesh....
Next time you find a girl with 'rip-off' clothing, take a picture and send it to me...Originally posted by wdlove
The naked breast isn't the real issue. The real issue is the Justin Timberlake performed violence on a women. It gives the wrong idea to young boys and men, that that kind of abuse of a female is OK!
The real beneficiary of this lawsuit will be the lawyers. In the end as usual all of us will pay.
Where is your address?Originally posted by johnnyjibbs
What is the world coming to? Sue me for posting!![]()
Originally posted by bennetsaysargh
people are over reacting. sure it was ok to talk about it for a day or two afterwards, but now there's law suits? come one. it's just a breast. how come they don't go after the people who air cops? that stereotypes all kinds of people and puts them in bad situations.
you can't even say **** nor damn without getting yelled at. it;s not like she was lusting towards the crowd with no clothes, it was her breast for 2 seconds, and there was something on it anyway! the FFC annoys me a great amount.
Originally posted by caveman_uk
I can't see why the Yanks are getting soooo worked up about a bit of flesh. It's strange that a nation that is otherwise so advanced hasn't advanced much beyond it's puritanical roots - witness the furore over this, the apparent willingness to bomb people in other countries and the execution of murderers. We'll be seeing them reintroduce the burning of witches and the stoning of gay people next...
...My rant over...bring on the rednecks...![]()
![]()
![]()
Originally posted by Hemingray
If you think that it's acceptable to teach children viewers that any kind of indecent exposure or filthy language is okay, then that's really sad. People who want to do that stuff on TV, go ahead! But don't do it when younger, impressionable viewers are more likely to be watching. I'm sure there are plenty of parents out there who don't care what their kids watch, but there are just that many more that do.
Ah...let's use that emotive word shall we? Porn. OK, so when a woman breast feeds a baby it's porn is it? Any exposure of 'the rude bits' is porn. All that art in the gallery? That's porn too. We have a daily newspaper that EVERY DAY has a topless girl on page 3. It's one of the biggest selling newspapers in the UK and last time I looked we hadn't all turned into drooling women-haters just 'cos we see tits everyday.Originally posted by jamdr
I don't think this lawsuit is irrelevant--the fact is, the entire half-time show was a display of sexually explicit behavior that was completely inappropriate for the audience. Americans don't get worked up about a bit of flesh, we just don't want national television networks showing our children porn.
Originally posted by caveman_uk
My point was how is a country that seems to accept that killing is OK when carried out by the state - either in a foreign land or in Texas - so mortified by seeing some middle-aged woman's flaccid tit. It seems a bit, you know, prudish on one hand and gung-ho on the other. We as a country may also be prepared to bomb foreigners but then we wouldn't have a national breakdown because we saw a semi-naked woman.
Originally posted by caveman_uk
Ah...let's use that emotive word shall we? Porn. OK, so when a woman breast feeds a baby it's porn is it? Any exposure of 'the rude bits' is porn. All that art in the gallery? That's porn too. We have a daily newspaper that EVERY DAY has a topless girl on page 3. It's one of the biggest selling newspapers in the UK and last time I looked we hadn't all turned into drooling women-haters just 'cos we see tits everyday.
My point was how is a country that seems to accept that killing is OK when carried out by the state - either in a foreign land or in Texas - so mortified by seeing some middle-aged woman's flaccid tit. It seems a bit, you know, prudish on one hand and gung-ho on the other. We as a country may also be prepared to bomb foreigners but then we wouldn't have a national breakdown because we saw a semi-naked woman.
As for the other comments - I was using the stoning of gays and and burning of witches as examples of unacceptable behaviour that used to happen. It was an attempt at irony. Sorry you don't get it...
Originally posted by caveman_uk
Ah...let's use that emotive word shall we? Porn. OK, so when a woman breast feeds a baby it's porn is it? Any exposure of 'the rude bits' is porn. All that art in the gallery? That's porn too. We have a daily newspaper that EVERY DAY has a topless girl on page 3. It's one of the biggest selling newspapers in the UK and last time I looked we hadn't all turned into drooling women-haters just 'cos we see tits everyday.
My point was how is a country that seems to accept that killing is OK when carried out by the state - either in a foreign land or in Texas - so mortified by seeing some middle-aged woman's flaccid tit. It seems a bit, you know, prudish on one hand and gung-ho on the other. We as a country may also be prepared to bomb foreigners but then we wouldn't have a national breakdown because we saw a semi-naked woman.
As for the other comments - I was using the stoning of gays and and burning of witches as examples of unacceptable behaviour that used to happen. It was an attempt at irony. Sorry you don't get it...
Originally posted by paulwhannel
The real issue here is that Americans act like a bunch of 6th-graders whenever something like this happens. Guess what? 50% of people on earth have breasts! It's not a big deal! This sort of thing wouldn't be a publicity stunt if people had mature attitudes about the human body.
The fundemental flaw in this argument is that having more conservative views of what should be allowed on broadcast TV is somehow wrong. Maybe you disagree with it, but I get sick of hearing that somehow the view that its ok to display lots of flesh is the only right view.Originally posted by caveman_uk
I can't see why the Yanks are getting soooo worked up about a bit of flesh. It's strange that a nation that is otherwise so advanced hasn't advanced much beyond it's puritanical roots
In case you hadn't noticed, most of us over here don't LIKE the war. Also the idea that somehow we will suddenly burn witches is laughable at best.
the apparent willingness to bomb people in other countries and the execution of murderers. We'll be seeing them reintroduce the burning of witches and the stoning of gay people next...
Originally posted by Krizoitz
In case you hadn't noticed, most of us over here don't LIKE the war. Also the idea that somehow we will suddenly burn witches is laughable at best.
Originally posted by zulgand04
CBS should be fined, because there the ones who were in charge, but most people did't even see it. Im 17, and dureing half time theres no point in watching 7 people do a min of there songs. Alot of my freinds agree. Most people i know did't even see it, but we sure saw it plaseterd on the news in the morning. Ok it happend, things happen. I think its worse to continue to have it as a headline. I mean get over it. It happend, CBS did all they could when it happend. Why does our media have to be so ****ed up and draw out stupid events when people are dieing in iraq.
The witches comment....It was irony..remember irony? It's not just like goldy or bronzy except made of iron. Strangely enough Alanis Morissette didn't know what it was either so you're not alone...Originally posted by Krizoitz
In case you hadn't noticed, most of us over here don't LIKE the war. Also the idea that somehow we will suddenly burn witches is laughable at best.