redAPPLE
macrumors 68030
Unorthodox said:
i thought that was michael jackson's baby pic?
Unorthodox said:
w_parietti22 said:I would define a normal life as:
- a constant home
- being taken care of by your own parents or adoptive parents; not people hired to do it.
- people love you for the person you are; not the money and fame that you have.
- learning how to make money for yourself; not having it handed to you.
- Not having people watch and talk about every single move you make.
- Not having who your dating announced to the entire world.
This girl is probably going to be cutting by 10, drinking and smoking by 13, and pregnant by 16.
The Mad Kiwi said:So you define a "normal life" as one where you never move location, don't have childcare, preschool, or school either, where your financial needs as a child aren't taken care of, and when you do get married you do it in secret. Not to mention that nobody cares about anything you do or say.
Sounds more like the life of a crack child to me.
Abstract said:Imagine the horror if the baby grew up and ended up being really ugly, or even average looking --- with parents who look like that? She's gonna have to be good looking, no?
Lau said:Yeah, cause Heat magazine in the UK is full of integrity and worthy articles....
XIII said:WTF? OMG i cant believe you sed dat! heet is like wel gud!!1!
Abstract said:Imagine the horror if the baby grew up and ended up being really ugly, or even average looking --- with parents who look like that? She's gonna have to be good looking, no?
Oi! Less of that! Some of us skunks are sober.lurcher said:Please tell me you were either:
1. joking when yo said that or
2. drunk as a skunk
lurcher said:Please tell me you were either:
1. joking when yo said that or
2. drunk as a skunk
please!
raggedjimmi said:People magazine? CNN?
I pity you americans![]()
Mr. Durden said:WTF? Oh yeah. You people dont have celebrities or beautiful people over there (oh wait... yeah I'm pretty sure), nor do your news agencies cover anything but the most important and crucial world wide news events. What a putz.
nbs2 said:There really want's a comment on how her parents will raise her. But, the six points are all going to be tough to get. Unfortunately, while I don't think people have become bigger celebrity worshipers than before, their addiction is fed more easily. Between the internet and the various magazines, it will be tough (makes me long for the heyday of made up stories in the National Inquirer) for the girl to avoid cameras. And, I suspect decisions will be difficult for her to make - being egged on by the public and the media will probably encourage even more outlandish behavior. I'll even put money on a very well distributed sex tape within 6 months of 18. Tragic? Yes. Her fault? Yes, but not as much as dealing with what I expect to be fairly absent parents and an intrusive public/media.
jsw said:On the other hand, lots of children of celebrities are just fine - look at Tom Hanks and Rita Wilson, for example; their kids seem OK. Kurt Russell and Goldie Hawn? Same thing.
Certainly many are messed up, but celebrity itself doesn't guarantee a screwed up kid. And, in the cases quoted above, those are celebrity children, as opposed to simply children of celebrities. And, of course, lots of celebrity children turn out OK too.
Of course, money and fame make it easier to get corrupted and easier for us to know about it, but it doesn't force it to happen.
raggedjimmi said:People magazine? CNN?
I pity you americans![]()