Great! thanks for your replies!
Seems worth it but is costly.
Worth pretty much nothing. People make up scenarios to justify it I find, but don't use it in practise. Most people I know now have a cellular Apple Watch, myself included, but only because they want stainless steel. No-one uses the cellular or pays for it. I tried it during the free trial and here's the main issues.
1: sound is crap and it's goofy talking from your wrist on speaker mode.
2: I always have my phone with me, even when cycling, though short runs are the exception.
3: Anyone worth anything in my life has my WeChat or WhatsApp and use that to talk to me. No-one in my industry texts each other (finance) it's getting to be uncommon for a client or colleague to text. They call, or if they can't get me there, they'll email. If they know me well they'll use WhatsApp in and out of hours.
4: replying on the watch is pants. It's slow and the UI is still a bit busy for such a small screen.
5: Setup in the UK is appalling. They need to simplify the whole process and remove the extra cost. Your cellular plan for the iPhone should be enough for the accessory. The cellular should activate when you first scan your Apple Watch with your phone. The tech isn't there for this yet as networks simply don't have a way of implementing it. Was talking to some guys at EE who were explaining the problems with it. Over time and with investment it'll be sorted, but only if they see it's popular. It's currently not. People are buying the cellular watches, they're not using the feature.
6: Ultras/safety? It's just not good enough a sports device for anything like ultra racing. It doesn't have the features or battery life, and it would only then be used as a secondary device for the safety of getting a call out. Ultra racers are minimalists, so good luck trying to get a decent one to take a
second watch.
People who're talking about leaving their phones at home when out where, in the city? They're just experimenting and on a honeymoon period with a new tech feature. They're not adding anything to their lives and the sacrificing the ability to do useful things like the one example above, where some talks of the freedom to go and get groceries without their phone. How funny is that. Not sports or anything where the phone would weigh you down, or have any meaningful impediment, just getting groceries.
Guess what, people with families or house shares often use their phones to take pictures of stuff in the store and ask, is this the right one, or which one you want? Or call to say they don't have this, should I try somewhere else? All that stuff is done so much better with your phone. If you're just nipping out for a moment to grab milk, then guess what, it makes no difference if you have your phone, watch or anything for that matter. Only thing you're doing is making it harder for someone to communicate with you on your smaller screen and speaker phone which isn't private. Oh now you need your headphones to make the call private. Are they synced? Good. Make sure you actually take them with you too. You know, while you're trying to 'free' yourself.
