Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
No Hard Drive can saturate a SATA I interface. I'll leave it at that.

Untrue. SATA usually peaks around 135 MB/s real-world performance due to overhead; many faster HDDs can saturate this, most especially the 600 GB Velociraptor, or any of the current 15K RPM incarnations out there. 3 TB 7200 RPM drives often can, too. We're talking sequential reads and writes of course, but the fact remains nonetheless.
 
Thankyou very much for the links!!!!!!

I've tried to do research on raid but all seems complicated!!! I think it makes 1 OS work on 2 hard drives? Come someone explain in a simple way for me!?

i thought on the bottom of the link about HDD's and SSD's the most used Raid setups are easy explained , sorry no idea how to explain it easier without leaving out vital information

but i try


in raid the performance multiplies with the amount of drives used , means a standard HDD has about 100MB/s (some more others a bit less ) a good SSD gets about 250MB/s now if you use 2 HDD's in raid you will get 200 MB's and come close to a good SSD in performance , if you use 4 HDD's you would in get 400 MB/s and get near double the performance of a SSD .

i see zen.state is already getting a nervous breakdown because of that explanation :D

thats theoretical , in reality there are a lot more factors to take into account and to explain and a lot factors that can make it a bit slower then the theory , like the Raid setup you choose (raid 0 ,raid 1 ....), the size of the HDD's....
 
Last edited:
Speed gains in a RAID configuration depend on the RAID level. Most common are RAID0, RAID1 and RAID5, which are the archetypes for any variations in RAID levels.

The idea behind RAID0, or "a striped array", is that files are split up 50:50 (in case of 2 drives, 25:25:25:25 in case of four drives) and can be synchronously written and read in approximately double (or quadruple) the speed of a single harddisk. The biggest caveat for RAID0 systems is that when one disk fails, you cannot recover the missing 50 or 25% of the original file, so you practically lose data on both disks.

The idea behind RAID1 (mirrored array) is redundancy: Every file is stored twice on 2 drives or four times on four, etc. This doesn't give you a backup of your data (since you can "destroy" data by accidentally deleting it), but it gives you redundancy in terms of the disks: If one fails, you still have the exact same data on the other disk.

RAID5 combines both concepts, in the sense that data is distributed among at least 3 disks. Data and parity information is distributed among those disks so that in the event of a drive failure everything can be restored, no matter which disk fails. This redundancy limits the available space for data on the disks, if you use 4 disks with 500GB each you get 1500GB usable space in comparison to 2TB if you didn't use RAID5. RAID5 is typically handled by expansion cards, since the concurrent mirroring and striping activity is somewhat computationally expensive (meaning that a dedicated chip delivers better performance). Newer logic board chipsets can handle the extra load, but in general it's recommended to use an extra SATA/SAS card (mostly out of compatibility and recoverability concerns).
 
Thankyou very much for the links!!!!!!

I've tried to do research on raid but all seems complicated!!! I think it makes 1 OS work on 2 hard drives? Come someone explain in a simple way for me!?
Edit: deleted the RAID explanation thing, because thorn has allready explained it, but I did not see his post at the time of writing.

You might also want to ask for the RAID thing in the logichelp.com forum, for data integritiy reasons in combination with logic.

a tip, search xbitlabs.com for a harddrive comparison (they go over 20 pages) to learn about the parameters there are, they sometime explain them and hos platter design affects speed, for example.
Oh and search for reviews on xlr8yourmac.com (google: WD 1TB site:xlr8yourmac.com). You will find that some report firmware problems with some generations of Hard Drives.

and go google: "how does platter density affect" or "platter density affects" (not effects, I let the search term unfinished, because it will giv you more results than "platter density affects speed")

you can find information about the numbers of platters etc. on the manufacturers homepage, sometimes you will have to download a pdf. If you can't find the info, copy the modelname (e.g. WD1000AADS), paste it in the google search form and append "how many platters" or just "platters" (without "").
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.