I echo the earlier poster's response that it ultimately depends on how effectively Apple replaces the functionality of the home button.
Right now, I still find it cumbersome to access the multitasking menu via force touch, and a virtual home button kinda defeats the whole point. Putting the home button on the front of the device means I can unlock it while it is lying flat on the table.
Also, reducing the bezels and enabling a smaller device also means less space for batteries. The iPhone 6S, which is already a large device relative to its screen size, still has only average battery life. Would a smaller iPhone mean shorter battery life too?
Right now, I still find it cumbersome to access the multitasking menu via force touch, and a virtual home button kinda defeats the whole point. Putting the home button on the front of the device means I can unlock it while it is lying flat on the table.
Also, reducing the bezels and enabling a smaller device also means less space for batteries. The iPhone 6S, which is already a large device relative to its screen size, still has only average battery life. Would a smaller iPhone mean shorter battery life too?