Sure a separate pricey ILC camera that is 10x larger [especially the probably 50x more lens optics] will be perceivably different when pixel peeping on a large display. How much of that is simply the result of the poor photo technique most users have when shooting using smartphones?If there is no perceivable speed bump in day to day use…no bother for the processor being 3 times the speed (battery though…). Camera: should be better, but I also read people don’t see the difference comparing a 13 and 17 (?). I never compared. Although I easily spot the phone photo and mirrorless photo when viewing on proper screen. Much more crispness, dynamic range and “realness” with the latter.
I will tell you that [properly shot] modern iPhone Pros are capable of excellent image capture, and that each year's new iPhone Pros have improved their capture capability. But do not believe just me; look at Apple's "shot on iPhone" advertising and see for yourself.
And the point here is not to pixel compare against a Nikon Z9 with a few thousand dollars worth of lens hanging on it. The point is that yes, there are significant year-over-year camera and processor differences. Any individual may of course choose to ignore those differences, but that does not make them not exist.
Last edited: