Maybe companies should just offer lifetime warranties on everything, that makes great sense and then the customer won't get "shafted."
Please don't start this argument. Saying "If you think X is OK, then clearly you would think 10X is better, which is crazy talk!" is not a good argument base (despite being seemingly popular today). Expecting a 2-3 grand computer to only last 12 months is unreasonable. 2 years is more reasonable, but 3 or 4 would be better, but we'll take what we can get. Over 5 years would be unreasonable for the customer to demand. At least, in my opinion.
I'm glad you like living in Australia. I don't know if you get investment and mortgage interest deductions in Australia or not, but looking at your country's tax rates and information it looks like my income tax rate based on 2012 income would be 30.4% + 1.5% for Medicare. I'm not going to say what my 2012 income was, but let's just say the income tax difference between US and AU would allow me to buy a number of MBPs as my effective tax rate for 2012 was 13.46%. That, to me, is worth more than an extra year or two of warranty.
We don't get taxed enough here in Australia. Our government doesn't have enough money to do all the things it needs to do. Considering our situation, I cannot imagine the US government has any money to do anything at all. Except spend on Defence, of course.
Education, health services, welfare for people less fortunate than me, and government-run infrastructure are all things I am more than willing to pay for.
...I see a 2.7GHz 15" rMBP lists for $3199AUD, which converts to $3027USD at today's exchange rate. The same rMBP lists for $2799USD here, so all else being equal you pay $228USD more ($240AUD) for the same rMBP. That translates into $228USD for an extra year of warranty. 3-year AppleCare here in the states is $349, that gives us an extra 2 years of coverage...at basically $175/yr.
This argument doesn't make sense, and if anything, supports me. We pay $228 extra, and get 2 years warranty, and therefore don't really need to buy Applecare, whereas you DON'T pay the that $240 bucks, but will go ahead and pay $350 extra instead for 3 years? We're still $110 ahead, considering the chances that a computer will fail not before 24 months, but also not after 36 months are basically zero.
I already know we're being shafted by Apple, but not when it comes to Mac prices. We overpay for iTunes music/TV/movie purchases, and other digital content. And Apple, music labels, and other providers of digital content are under investigation by our government to find out why, who is to blame, and put an end to it.
You like your country, I get that. I like mine. What I don't understand is your implied view that individuals do not need help to be able to stand up against multinational companies when they act callously to their customers.