He got the prices very wrong.... and also the fact that you can buy seperate bands (well -except for apple watch edition ) data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c4fb/1c4fb4a004ac374ae735c210f8560be0dce354ac" alt="Roll Eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:"
He got the prices very wrong.... and also the fact that you can buy seperate bands (well -except for apple watch edition )![]()
So what you're telling me is that someone on the internet was....wrong?
He'll still claim victory for correctly predicting outlandish prices for the Edition models.
they arent outlandish compared to other gold watches
Yeah he overpriced the steel and underpriced the edition, but he was a lot closer than most other people.
Also that's a pretty huge gap between the two collections, which would be hard to have predicted
I mean it goes from $549-$1,000 to $10,000-$17,000
they arent outlandish compared to other gold watches
Other watches aren't useless after 2 years when the battery stops taking a charge.
I wouldnt call Gruber "someone on the internet"
I would he's just a gossip columnist. There are thousands of him on the Internet
Good, I called him out on his outlandish $$$$ predictions. I don't want to hear "Gruber said" anymore.
Well, he was in the ballpark for the Edition watch. He thought it would start at $7499 for the sports band, but it starts at $10k.
The Edition really is a limited edition model intended for a halo effect. Apple is giving notice to the luxury market that it wants to compete there. $10,000 isn't outrageous for an 18kt gold watch. Burberry has 2 on their website for $13,000 and $14,000. They have ordinary quartz mechanisms.
Yeah he overpriced the steel and underpriced the edition, but he was a lot closer than most other people.
Also that's a pretty huge gap between the two collections, which would be hard to have predicted
I mean it goes from $549-$1,000 to $10,000-$17,000