World of Warcraft is the only game I care about. Whenever somebody gets their hands on a new mac with the M1 chips, can you please advise how WoW runs on it?
WOW was one of the very first games to get Metal support, so that contradicts what you just said.I really do not think Blizzard cares about its Mac player base because as soon as a new OS appears which seems
to be pretty frequent these days Blizzard jumps on it pretty quick leaving behind the users who for one reason
or another do not want to or need to jump onto the latest OS, yet they keep supporting Windows 7.
Consider looking at it this way: every single iOS developer now has access to the Mac ecosystem.Apple was already a small gaming group that a lot of developers considered "not worth it"...
the people jumping on the M1 train are now in a group that makes the above Apple group look humongous.
Consider looking at it this way: every single iOS developer now has access to the Mac ecosystem.
It's a plus just by sheer numbers. There will be a few gems that translate well from iOS to Mac, and other developers will take notice of the $$.thats not a plus.
As long as it runs WoW Classic, I'm OK. That's all I ever play anymore.
Yup, WoW Classic is where it's atAs long as it runs WoW Classic, I'm OK. That's all I ever play anymore.
I first played WoW on my iMac G4, which I am sure was slower than any of the Intel Macs. It was never a game that required high-end HW to run okay, but things are a little different with Classic.I know that this is not helpful information, but I find it amusing that this game needs a fairly decent GPU to run well considering it ran fine on a 2006 iMac/MBP base config. 2004 game and doesn't look much better than it did back then, at least to me. I believe WoW classic has the same requirements which is odd to me, isn't it supposed to be the 2004 version?
Yup, as mentioned above it, is using the retail engine, totally understand why they did that but it then makes it more resource-hungry than the original from 2004.isn't it supposed to be the 2004 version?
Seems we'll have support, now the major question is performance![]()
Mac Support Update -- November 16
With this week’s patch 9.0.2, we’re adding native Apple Silicon support to World of Warcraft. This means that the WoW 9.0.2 client will run natively on ARM64 architecture, rather than under emulation via Rosetta. We’re pleased to have native day one support for Apple Silicon. While our testing...eu.forums.blizzard.com
I wonder if that includes WoW Classic?Seems we'll have support, now the major question is performance![]()
Mac Support Update -- November 16
With this week’s patch 9.0.2, we’re adding native Apple Silicon support to World of Warcraft. This means that the WoW 9.0.2 client will run natively on ARM64 architecture, rather than under emulation via Rosetta. We’re pleased to have native day one support for Apple Silicon. While our testing...eu.forums.blizzard.com
I am curious about what Macs you play WoW on and the specs of them.Can't be any worse than any of my current Macs![]()
WoW still works on my Mac Pro 2008 running Catalina with EVGA Nvidia GTX 680 Mac Edition. I think it works with macOS High Sierra and later. The MouSSE kext is required for this old Mac (it's part of the dosdude1 Catalina patcher).I have a pretty old Mac and WoW seems to run pretty well on it. I no longer have the settings up to 11 like I did with Mists of Pandaria, but I wouldn't consider how it runs and the settings as bad.
All those in my signature - I have to keep a PC around for games like WoW because none of the Macs are sufficiently powerful for mythic raiding min/maxing.I wonder if that includes WoW Classic?
I am curious about what Macs you play WoW on and the specs of them.
I have a pretty old Mac and WoW seems to run pretty well on it. I no longer have the settings up to 11 like I did with Mists of Pandaria, but I wouldn't consider how it runs and the settings as bad.