**** that. SE had 6mo old iPhone 6S internals.
My wife and sister sure as hell wont upgrade to 24mo old ****.
https://twitter.com/stroughtonsmith/status/1032291675455057926
Same resolution and RAM as iPhone 7. This means 4.7" display.
My guess is a de-featured iPhone 7: no 3D Touch and fewer case colors. The only modem in this phone would be the Intel XMM 7560. Qualcomm publicly stated they were removed as a supplier for new iPhones.
This iPhone 7 SE would continue to serve the original mission of the SE: a low-cost device for emerging markets. The 4.0" form factor is at a dead end. So it's time to move to 4.7" to fight the $150 phones that now come with 5.0" and larger displays.
SE already has 2GB.
&Resolution does not necessarily mean the same physical size
I disagree 4.0" is dead too
maybe a 4.7" with no bezels would be one handed comfortable, but barring that, there is merit in 4.0" and iOS 11 handles it better than I thought it would have... I have two SE's because I love the phone that much (and the one I just got was $80 from at&t as a clearance prepaid item so...), one on 10.2 other on 11.2.5 and my preference is 10 but the 11 is alright. minus scrambled iMessages haha but it's not my primary device. what an annoying bug! never had on 11.1 on my X or Plus, or 11.3.
So you think Apple will design a brand new thin-bezel enclosure for this low-cost device with A10, 2GB RAM, and Home button? It has the same resolution as iPhone 7 but the physical design is different? Let's be real.
No but I think it’s more
Likely to get another SE physically w a resolution and contrast Bump and a10 drop in than another 7 but stripped down
But hopefully we find out soon either way!
Putting the iPhone 7 display into the SE form factor would result in a device with PPI that exceeds iPhone 8.
It wouldn't make sense for a number of reasons: 1) The SE doesn't need a PPI increase. 2) This is a low-cost device with A10 and 2GB RAM. 3) What happens to iPhone 8 in terms of marketing?
Anything is possible, but the signs are pointing to an iPhone 7 SE.
Who said the SE is low cost? Apple didn’t, SE stands for Special Edition, not cheap and cheerful. And who cares about the 8? I think it’s pretty clear Apple doesn’t car with new phones outshining the design, including one matchung the 8 Plus price apparently.
If Apple cared about marketing like you think they wouldn’t have the 6S and 6S Plus and 7 and 7 Plus, and 8 and 8 Plus and X all on sale at the same time! What this year going to bring? The 7 & 7 Plus, 8 & 8 Plus, 9, X, 11, 11 Plus and I bet the 6S will still be kicking around, all on sale at the same time. Plus the SE.
As for PPI increase, that’s an opinion that makes little sense, your basically questioning why they should improve the SE.
Apple will never call their devices low-cost in order to preserve brand value. But it's pretty obvious what market the iPhone 5c, SE, and iPad 2017/2018 serve.
The DCI-P3 feature and PPI increase don't make sense for a 4" device with A10 and 2GB RAM. It's the same reason why Toyota doesn't put an electrochromic panoramic sunroof in the Corolla.
The iPhone 6s, 7, 8, and X follow a pattern of increasing features with price. I'm not sure how you don't understand Apple's marketing.
First point is an assumption, the SE was built on the 5 which was the flagship device. Not low cost, it’s feature specs when launched were good too.
Point 2 is confusing as we are talking about a 4.7” screen, not 4”. It would make sense to a lot of SE and 7 users, perhaps not those who crave for big screen big phones?
And the last point, the feature differences between those devices don’t warrant the price increases, that’s Apples profiteering, wireless charging, stereo speakers, iOS cameras all existed long before those devices had them and on cheaper devices too.
Also it still fails to explain why they are all on sale at the same time. And their is no reason for the SE to not follow the same route either. Your somehow suggesting that the SE has to be different to every other iPhone model, or marketing, just because.
As for the low cost debate it’s an interesting one
I think it was apple trying it with a boatload of old parts that were once and to some still considered more premium than some junk androids. The one handed ness and chamfered edges (tho no longer polished) exude a bit of premium ness. A9 and the camera and screen are yesteryear but 6s is a screen like 6 and 5s was the one before it. So ? It’s not THAT ancient with perspective in mind even tho in real time half a decade
The iPhone SE lacks 3D Touch, uses a 1.2MP front camera, 1x1 Wi-Fi, and features the same modem as iPhone 6 (from 2014). The iPhone SE may have offered "good" performance but it's consistent with a $399 device which lacks some important premium features. I call that a low-cost phone.
So this new iPhone 7 SE will have a 4.7" display but a completely new enclosure? What are you proposing?
So you're trying to make a philosophical or ethical argument instead of a marketing one.
SE - 6s - 7 - 8 - X
The more expensive the phone, the more features it has. They can be sold concurrently, yes. It's really quite simple. Apple sells phones to consumers at all price points.
[doublepost=1535063699][/doublepost]
If Apple was trying to create a premium 4.0" device with the SE, they wouldn't have made any compromises like Touch ID 1.0, 1.2MP front camera, 1x1 Wi-Fi or old modem. I think it's pretty obvious what market Apple was trying to target.
Apple could have sold the SE for $449 or $549, even $599. That would still be below the $649 launch price of iPhone 5s, 6, and 6s.
Chances are it's just a iPhone 7 refresh with 64GB as base.
Same way they brought in a 32GB iPhone 6S to replace the 16GB model.
Chances are it's just a iPhone 7 refresh with 64GB as base.
Same way they brought in a 32GB iPhone 6S to replace the 16GB model.