I am hoping you guys can point out some thing I am missing. The other day I decieded to see what the new Opteron servers would cost. I was pleasently suprised. I then checked out the Apple store, and was dumbfounded by the difference in price.
Here are the configurations:
Opteron
-Dual AMD Opteron 242 (1.6 GHz)
-1U Rack Mount Case
-2 GB DDR333 RAM (1 GB for Each Processor, not shared)
-200 GB Western Digital w/ 8 MB Cache
-DVD-ROM / CD-RW
-Built in 10/100 Ethernet
-Add On 10/100/1000 3Com NIC
-Floppy Drive
-Red Hat 9.0 Operating System
$3,500 (Approx) www.monarchcomputing.com
XServe
-Dual 1.33 GHz G4
-1U Rack Mount
-2 GB DDR333
-180 GB Hard Drive
-DVD-ROM / CD-RW
-Dual Gigibit Ethernet
-OS X Server w/ Unlimited Clients
$5,900 (Approx)
From where I stand, that is a huge price difference for a machine with lower specs.
CPU: AMD is 64-Bit Capible, and Faster, Hypertransport, On board multi-processor control
RAM: AMD Actually has full implementation of DDR, plus onboard memory control on the processor.
Hard Drive: AMD Larger, w/ Larger Cache
Optical Drive: Tie
Network: Apple w/ Dual Gigibit
OS: Apple (OS X is easier that Red Hat, plus Red Hat isn't 64-bit yet.)
Given all this, I'd just like to know if I missed something, and what would convince somebody to go with the XServe over the Opteron server. I am truly interested in a discussion, not a Mac v. PC argument.
Here are the configurations:
Opteron
-Dual AMD Opteron 242 (1.6 GHz)
-1U Rack Mount Case
-2 GB DDR333 RAM (1 GB for Each Processor, not shared)
-200 GB Western Digital w/ 8 MB Cache
-DVD-ROM / CD-RW
-Built in 10/100 Ethernet
-Add On 10/100/1000 3Com NIC
-Floppy Drive
-Red Hat 9.0 Operating System
$3,500 (Approx) www.monarchcomputing.com
XServe
-Dual 1.33 GHz G4
-1U Rack Mount
-2 GB DDR333
-180 GB Hard Drive
-DVD-ROM / CD-RW
-Dual Gigibit Ethernet
-OS X Server w/ Unlimited Clients
$5,900 (Approx)
From where I stand, that is a huge price difference for a machine with lower specs.
CPU: AMD is 64-Bit Capible, and Faster, Hypertransport, On board multi-processor control
RAM: AMD Actually has full implementation of DDR, plus onboard memory control on the processor.
Hard Drive: AMD Larger, w/ Larger Cache
Optical Drive: Tie
Network: Apple w/ Dual Gigibit
OS: Apple (OS X is easier that Red Hat, plus Red Hat isn't 64-bit yet.)
Given all this, I'd just like to know if I missed something, and what would convince somebody to go with the XServe over the Opteron server. I am truly interested in a discussion, not a Mac v. PC argument.