Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Most likely the client would want this thing his way... so to make the best out of worse, i suggest you go with applematt suggestion to put it in a small flash clip and do a fade in and fade out with volume control.
 
a JScript will also allow to play, pause, stop volume control the music on the site. Have you tried doing that, you can also have a small selection of tracks to play from.

You can also have the music phase in and out of various pages. :)
 
stylum said:
Can you just show them this thread?
It's filled with the point of view of Pros...

Yes, show him this thread! and tell him twice that music into a website sucks... ohhh "el cheapo" website... grrr... come on..
 
snkTab said:
However, you have to abide by the clients wishes no matter if "you" don't like it. Your job is to implement his vision even if it is cheesy.

In the end perhaps, but simply implementing a client's vision is a job any Web-hack can do. As a designer, you should use your reputation to sway your clients toward something that you can be proud of having in your portfolio. Your work is a reflection of yourself and you are defined by the work you do. If he absolutely MUST have music, find a way to make it inobtrusive and possibly tasteful. I think QUIET and BACKGROUND are the key words here. Think of it like Muzak- it's best when you don't notice it. - j
 
snkTab said:
However, you have to abide by the clients wishes no matter if "you" don't like it. Your job is to implement his vision even if it is cheesy.

No, the jobs of professionnals is to recommend people. If I went to buy a car with square wheels, I sure hope as hell they wouldn't sell me one just because I asked for it.
 
Yvan256 said:
No, the jobs of professionnals is to recommend people. If I went to buy a car with square wheels, I sure hope as hell they wouldn't sell me one just because I asked for it.

Wish it were that simple- unfortunately there's more than one kind of client- there's the kind that understands how to use you for more than your production abilities, and then there's the 'shut up and do it' kind. It is seldom that you are lucky enough to have all of the good kind of client, because both kinds pay the bills.
 
decksnap said:
Wish it were that simple- unfortunately there's more than one kind of client- there's the kind that understands how to use you for more than your production abilities, and then there's the 'shut up and do it' kind. It is seldom that you are lucky enough to have all of the good kind of client, because both kinds pay the bills.

True but if a client asks you to do something that is wrong such as use copy-protected media then you have the right to refuse, this is part of any designers/educated individuals training. If you do not properly educated the client on the subject they could turn on you if they are ever pursued by the rightful owners of the copyright... I have seen it happen too many times... this is why studios sometimes have legal representatives.

I think the situation here is that if the music is owned by someone and the client is creating a promotional site for profit then you should not put the music on, unless they have obtained the proper rights to do so.

If the music is not protected and or your client has the rights, then by all means go ahead but take time to address the issues that have been commented here in this forum.
 
CanadaRAM said:
Sure, if it is a public domain song and he performs it himself, there will be no copyright problem. However, anything off a CD also has performance rights -- the performance of the music is protected as well as the copyright on the music itself and the lyrics.

This is spot on. There is copyright in the song and the performance (and even the arrangement). So he either has to have a version out of copyright (a 60 year old record..) or some lame-o cobbled together job.

Having said that I bet there are non-copyright protected versions of the wedding march knocking around....
 
Flowbee said:
Just use a midi file instead... it would sound ultra-classy! [Listen]

[Edit: The link is midisource.freeservers.com/bride.mid for all you PithHelmet users.]

I can't get the link to work (access verboten) – but do I really want to?
Is it bad or is it just bad?
 
jayscheuerle said:
In the end perhaps, but simply implementing a client's vision is a job any Web-hack can do. As a designer, you should use your reputation to sway your clients toward something that you can be proud of having in your portfolio.

that's why I included this line in my post on how to sway the client.

That said, say something like "music on websites is generally not a good idea. users will go to your website in different enviroments and have different preferences on what they listen to. they are coming for the visual presentation which is also what we would like them to see and the audio will distract them from the visual presentation. music is also a bad idea because most web browsing contains no sound, thus music will at some level will be unwelcome by the users. we recommened that the website not have music/sound because it does not add value to the message that your site is trying to portray and may actually hurt sales."

and also in the end, the client doesn't care about your portfolio, he cares about his webpage.
 
Blue Velvet said:
I can't get the link to work (access verboten) – but do I really want to?
Is it bad or is it just bad?

Just bad. Imagine Mendelssohn's Wedding March as played on the cheapest Casio keyboard.
 
Just let him use the stupid song.

It's his choice and will be his problem in the future.

But instead of linking to his page with his song on your design site (if one exists), just host his site on your own server and take out the song. :)

scem0
 
You guys are all wrong

Tastefully done music on a website is soon going to be nessasary. Ever increasing bandwith with allow for more multimedia like experiences on the web. We are an audio and visual culture. Would you expect no music on CNN or ESPN. Those clients clients who want music on their sites, me being one of them, recognize wanting to stimulate as many senses as possible for marketing to our customers. The question is, why NOT have music or even better, a narrative voiceover? Common guys, every one and there mother can put together a website. What sets you professionals apart is the ability to DESIGN. These clients are bussiness owners who are future thinkers, you better listen to their wants, and insatead of hating sites with music, DESIGN one that knocks peoples socks off. Would you ever listen to Star Wars without the music track. Expand your abilities.
 
AdamZ said:
Would you ever listen to Star Wars without the music track. Expand your abilities.

The more likely question is would you come to Macrumors, or slashdot, or ebay, or yahoo, or amazon, if they all had music playing in the background. The key to effective design is to compliment what people are doing, whether its listening to music or watching tv or sitting in a cubical on lunch break. Music competes, not compliments. Watching TV or a movie and surfing the web are very different things. I also would suggest that the purpose of the site is to inform prospective clients, not entertain them.
 
AdamZ said:
Would you expect no music on CNN or ESPN.

That's different. The question should be: Would you expect music on CNN.com or ESPN.com? My answer: No. P.S. Both these sites don't have background music. What is necessary for one medium may not be necessary for another medium.
 
Flowbee said:
Just use a midi file instead... it would sound ultra-classy! [Listen]

[Edit: The link is midisource.freeservers.com/bride.mid for all you PithHelmet users.]

Link doesn't work as it sees the referrer is macrumors.com

Anybody **wishing** to hear this song go here: http://midisource.freeservers.com/ and then click the 'Wedding March (Here Comes The Bride) ' link.
 
Thanks for clearing that up. I've removed the link form the original post.

[Note: The links to the songs on Midisource may not show up if you have PithHelmet enabled.]
 
What the pros have to say about music on websites: "If I wanted your site to make sounds, I would lick my finger and rub it on the screen." Enough said.
 
AdamZ said:
Tastefully done music on a website is soon going to be nessasary. Ever increasing bandwith with allow for more multimedia like experiences on the web. We are an audio and visual culture. Would you expect no music on CNN or ESPN. Those clients clients who want music on their sites, me being one of them, recognize wanting to stimulate as many senses as possible for marketing to our customers. The question is, why NOT have music or even better, a narrative voiceover? Common guys, every one and there mother can put together a website. What sets you professionals apart is the ability to DESIGN. These clients are bussiness owners who are future thinkers, you better listen to their wants, and insatead of hating sites with music, DESIGN one that knocks peoples socks off. Would you ever listen to Star Wars without the music track. Expand your abilities.

I can garauntee that that will never be the case. Why? It's annoying. Period. I've never seen a site that included background music that worked well. Yes, you want any video or animation sequences to have accompanying audio, but for a standard page, it's got to be the most obnoxious thing on the web.

This is a generally widespread sentiment. Look at this thread. Probably 1% of people would actually like this. The rest of us go to the competitors, music free, site and the offending business goes under, along with their aweful musicical webpage. If I ever end up at a site with background music, and I don't see a button to turn it off within .5 seconds I hit the back button and leave. And never visit again.

This simply won't become the norm becuase people don't like it. Nothing to do with the fact that you CAN do it easily now, it's a matter of usability.

Rob
 
AdamZ said:
Tastefully done music on a website is soon going to be nessasary. Ever increasing bandwith with allow for more multimedia like experiences on the web. We are an audio and visual culture. Would you expect no music on CNN or ESPN. Those clients clients who want music on their sites, me being one of them, recognize wanting to stimulate as many senses as possible for marketing to our customers. The question is, why NOT have music or even better, a narrative voiceover? Common guys, every one and there mother can put together a website. What sets you professionals apart is the ability to DESIGN. These clients are bussiness owners who are future thinkers, you better listen to their wants, and insatead of hating sites with music, DESIGN one that knocks peoples socks off. Would you ever listen to Star Wars without the music track. Expand your abilities.


I completely 100% disagree. Having music, or sounds of any kind, start up as soon as a user loads a page is terrible design. Having multimedia at the controls of the user is another thing.

You know what I am doing right now while typing this? Listening to a tune from my iTunes library, while surfing.

You know what I was doing an hour ago? Photoshopping a logo for a client, with the laptop on my...well, lap... sitting next to my wife who was watching t.v. I was also surfing the web in the background when I needed a sanity break from the PS document.

Yesterday I met a friend for lunch, and while he was finishing up his work I jumped on their wireless network and surfed a bit.

In ALL of those cases, I would have been PISSED if I loaded a webpage and audio started playing out of nowhere, stamping on my iTunes song. My wife would have been pissed if it screwed up her watching her movie. It would have been embarrassing to my buddy to have audio start blaring out of his cubicle area.

Nope.... audio and video need to be at the control of the user.

Edit: Your Star Wars analogy is a bit off. When I sit down to watch a movie I expect sound. When I surf it is usually while multi tasking on other things, such as watching that movie, listening to tunes, iChatting, etc. If you took a poll the vast majority of people do NOT expect sound when surfing the web, can't remember where their speakers are set, etc. People want control of their computer, and sounds shooting off unexpectedly is not control.
 
Stampyhead said:
I agree with everyone here that, in most cases, putting music on a website is very low-class and trashy.
That said, if you absolutely have to do it then Flash is the way to go. The problem with having the music play straight from the HTML is that it comes up full volume with no way to turn it down or off (unless th user does so on his own speakers, of course). Flash allows you to adjust the volume of the music and allows the user to turn it of if he does not want to hear it. I believe a Flash movie has to be at least 18 x 18px, so you could create a Flash movie that is little more than a sound file and a button to turn off the music.
Good luck!

ChicoWeb said:
Wow. Tell him the reality of having music on his/her site. That it will piss people off, make them shut their window, and he would lose business. Just tell him striaght up that he will loose business and this is not an industry standard technique and that it is very unprofessional. I would never integrate music into a clients site. I don't care what he/she thinks they want. Thats why we are the professionals.

snkTab said:
I think music sucks on websites, unless suited.

However, you have to abide by the clients wishes no matter if "you" don't like it. Your job is to implement his vision even if it is cheesy. Maybe the wedding he host at the place are cheesy. You can politely remind the client that from a user standpoint, it's distracting and then the rights issues. But, be professional in a business standpoint not in a I'm a professional web designer and I don't include music standpoint.

That said, say something like "music on websites is generally not a good idea. users will go to your website in different enviroments and have different preferences on what they listen to. they are coming for the visual presentation which is also what we would like them to see and the audio will distract them from the visual presentation. music is also a bad idea because most web browsing contains no sound, thus music will at some level will be unwelcome by the users. we recommened that the website not have music/sound because it does not add value to the message that your site is trying to portray and may actually hurt sales."

as far as having your professionalism on the line, you are just going to have to take losses (in that aspect) if the client is way to thrilled with music. just move on and not include him in your portfolio. professionalism is in the way you act. IMO, never tell the client that you are a professional developer when you are trying to persuade him. flaunting credentials is just going to belittle the client. merely suggest the benefits and discuss them with your clients. Communication is the key. when it comes down to it, he knows his business, you know web design, thus harmony is most likely achieved with a good mixture of the too.

I do agree with snkTab professionalism. You do not talk your client out of something becase you can't do it. It shows your shortcoming as a problem solver and as well as a communicator.

As for the sound on web site, it all depends on contents and style of the site. There are sites that have sound that enriches the contents tremendously. This applies to site contents that is more entertainment and fashion oriented.

Having a beautiful classical track such as the Bach Aria with wedding picture can bring tears to your eyes and make the contents more meaningful.

As a designer, your expertise is to communicate and to solved problems. A good designer challenges and pushes the envelope and make it successful with given assets and guidlines.
 
I had a client once who DEMANDED that his website play the sound from THX certified movies when it booted up. You know that annoying horn blast while the letters explode or whatever it is.
We tried telling him many times that 1)It was cheesy as hell and 2)It's illegal to use that clip because we don't own it and we'll get sued.

I think eventually my brain dead boss just made him sign a wavier that said he was responsible if Lucas films found out and sued.

fyi> I don't work for this company anymore.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.