B
The worst bond of all is Timothy.
Connery was great. Daniel Craig is a close second in my book. But I also like Moore and Dalton. Brosnan was only good in Golden Eye.
Personally I am on the fence between Craig and Connery. Craig is more serious but Connery is classic. I choose Craig but by a close margin.
Daniel Craig would have been a fine Bond, but unfortunately the producers decided to cast him as Generic Action Guy and discarded most of the key ingredients of the Bond franchise (gags, gadgets, girls) in order to make a watered-down Bourne clone.
Personally I am on the fence between Craig and Connery. Craig is more serious but Connery is classic. I choose Craig but by a close margin.
Isn't Craig playing Bond the way the novel intended?I chose Connery. However, Brosnan is a close 2nd.
I'd don't think Craig is a good Bond. He's "okay" but doesn't fit the character well enough, in my opinion.
Isn't Craig playing Bond the way the novel intended?
Yep, and those investments would have been three years old. I think it's time that you put your calendar in for repairFrom your headline, I thought this thread was going to be about investments...
Yep, and those investments would have been three years old. I think it's time that you put your calendar in for repair
KGB![]()
Sean Connery all the way.