As long as the spam is on topic, insightful, and answers that nagging question they leave in their thread title.killuminati said:I noticed that I am almost at 2,000 posts here on MR and thought back on all of them. I realized that I must have a 50:1 spam to helpful post ratio, it's horrible. Well I guess this thread is just making that number worse 😛
Except his MINI is no more-- it's now his S2000. 😛Sun Baked said:Most people tiptoe around answering the thread title, but when you see a thread title like "I crashed my mini" all you can think of is the bad run edesignuk had with his Mini. 😱
devilot said:Except his MINI is no more-- it's now his S2000. 😛
hahahahaha....I am reminded of Hawaii (in addition to the obvious reference)mactastic said:All spam all the time. Like this:
Man: You sit here, dear.
Wife: All right.
Man: Morning!
Waitress: Morning!
Man: Well, what've you got?
Waitress: Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam; spam bacon sausage and spam; spam egg spam spam bacon and spam; spam sausage spam spam bacon spam tomato and spam;
Vikings: Spam spam spam spam...
Waitress: ...spam spam spam egg and spam; spam spam spam spam spam spam baked beans spam spam spam...
Auggh! You overflowed my calculator!iGav said:6,585 to 0
Actually this one makes it 6,586 to 0
Doctor Q said:Perhaps we should be measuring our spam-to-total-post ratios or our helpful-to-total-post ratios rather than our spam-to-helpful ratios.
mactastic said:![]()
Take that!
No... and I deleted it because it throws off the ratio. 😉blackfox said:jsw, was your double-post in this thread meant to be ironic?