Did anyone actually really think it would be better, bigger, faster, better battery life AND thinner and lighter? Really?
Wanting a more aesthetically pleasing design doesn’t mean what we want is necessarily something that’s thinner and lighter.Did anyone actually really think it would be better, bigger, faster, better battery life AND thinner and lighter? Really?
Why would you count The small round feet in additional thickness? I don’t count the feet ever. It’s only the computer itself I Measure. Are we nitpickingHas actually no one noticed, that Apple measured the thickness of the new MBPs WITHOUT the devices feet? The only scaled the body thickness of the MacBook Pro, but left the feet out. so technically, these devices are thicker than the previous generation, but are thinner on paper when you don’t consider the additional thickness that comes with their feet…
I wish that were true, but there’s a couple hundred page thread about the 16” MBP overheating and I’ve been running my $4.5k laptop with turboboost disabled so my fans aren’t at full blast. I’m very very happy that they’re putting out a laptop that leans more towards function.You can have both, no?
Form following function is always the goal.I'd rather it work better than look better.
I'd rather it work better than look better.
Jony Ive still consults for Apple. His company probably had a lot of input with the new MBP design.Maybe Jony wasn't so bad after all.
On the other hand, the 2016-2019 design language looks more fragile than the more utilitarian look of the new 2021 models. It gives it a more "this sucker means business" vibe which is important since we've come from an area where form over function seemed to rule the day.The thing is a little husky.
Can’t deny it. ?
Given everything I first heard about Apple Silicon, I was actually expecting more of the same form factor.Did anyone actually really think it would be better, bigger, faster, better battery life AND thinner and lighter? Really?