Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Please add an option to change the frame rate.
60fps is terrible for watching anything except video Games

-AE
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: nol2001
I won't be going back to the YouTube app until they include picture-in-picture support. Being locked inside their app just to keep a video playing just doesn't work for me.
It’s totally ******** that they don’t support the iOS app. Literally no excuse except...yeah, no excuse.
 
092E0D41-C501-4902-B6A0-DD9DF1187341.jpeg

iPhone SE (2020) 😂-looks great for an non HDR screen 😂
 
1440p hdr is also working on my 2018 iPad Pro. What’s crazy is that a while ago, when my iPad was jailbroken, it supported hdr and 1440p.
 
I can’t work out why YouTube will not implement Picture in Picture. Surely it would mean users spend even more time using their app, view videos and thus adverts and thus generating more revenue.
 
Well it isn't so much about HDR, but Apple supporting VP9, which will offer better quality than H.264 it was using previously.

Not exactly a fan of AV1 but VP9 is ok since hardware decoding support "should" have been there all along on recent iPhone Hardware. ( Hardware Decode for VP9 and HEVC are very similar )
 
I was considering the 12 Max, but I'm in no hurry after watching Marques' review. I'm still running my two-year-old XS-Max, and the only reason I will upgrade this year is to upgrade my GF's aging iPhone.
Maybe I lost some of my Apple mojo, but I'm just not feeling it as much as I used to.
 
I can’t work out why YouTube will not implement Picture in Picture. Surely it would mean users spend even more time using their app, view videos and thus adverts and thus generating more revenue.
I assume the advertisers pay more the more of your field of vision it takes. A full-page ad in a newspaper costs more than a tiny ad. A way around this would be to keep PiP but pause it when there's an ad, force you to full-screen it and then resume in PiP when the ad is done.

This way they could really tease you into getting youTube premium.

I remember the very old days where you could watch a youtube video, lock the screen and then hit play in the "now playing" thing and you got just the audio of the video playing while the phone was in your pocket with the screen off. I miss that.
 
Like one other user reported, this is working on my iPhone 11 regular (non OLDE) with 4k HDR 60fps. Nice!
 
I think it's interesting they have to update the app to support newer iPhones but HDR has been available for a long time.
The real story though is that YouTube on iOS now supports up to 8k video!
After discovering this last week, I rewatched a lot of the UHD 4k HDR demos on the HDR channel on my iPad Pro. It looks a lot nicer even if the Pro is not quite 4k.
 
It’s totally ******** that they don’t support the iOS app. Literally no excuse except...yeah, no excuse.
As someone else indicated, the PIP feature is likely coming but background playback is supported today only for those with a YouTube premium subscription and I don't see that changing. If you're a subscriber already, then definitely chase Google to add that feature.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GuruZac
HDR options are also only available on devices released since 2017 that have OLED displays

HDR doesn’t work on my Apple Watch. That’s it, I’m cancelling my YouTube Red subscription
 
To those thinking their non-OLED displays are supporting HDR (my iPad Pro 11” 2018 also shows “HDR” in YouTube), this article explains that they can play HDR videos, but not in full HDR because of brightness limitations...


It is true that you can watch HDR movies on the iPad Pro; the problem is they are not actually screening on your device in HDR. They are actually outputting in EDR (Extended Dynamic Range), which is one step below HDR. In effect, the color gamut on the iPad Pro supports the necessary color range for HDR, but not the brightness. To gain HDR certification, the iPad Pro would need to produce 700 nits of brightness; it only produces 600 nits. It's better than SDR, but it is certainly not HDR.
 
To those thinking their non-OLED displays are supporting HDR (my iPad Pro 11” 2018 also shows “HDR” in YouTube), this article explains that they can play HDR videos, but not in full HDR because of brightness limitations...


It is true that you can watch HDR movies on the iPad Pro; the problem is they are not actually screening on your device in HDR. They are actually outputting in EDR (Extended Dynamic Range), which is one step below HDR. In effect, the color gamut on the iPad Pro supports the necessary color range for HDR, but not the brightness. To gain HDR certification, the iPad Pro would need to produce 700 nits of brightness; it only produces 600 nits. It's better than SDR, but it is certainly not HDR.
It's fine. The standard calls for 1000 nits minimum but OLEDs and other HDR capable devices will just compensate for the brightness range of the display.
 
yah, something about brightness to be true HDR. While you can support color and contrast, the nits level has to be a minimum of 700 or something
It's not only about brightness! It's about local contrast. OLED is self-emissive, meaning each pixel can be completely black, whereas LCD displays must use FALD to achieve higher contrast.
 
Too bad YouTube’s optimization ruins anything that isn’t pitch black or bright. Everything else in between is riddled with digital artifacts. It looks terrible!
actually, YT HDR looks spectacular Maybe your Internet is too slow, because hundreds of millions around the globe appreciate their HDR content.
 
actually, YT HDR looks spectacular Maybe your Internet is too slow, because hundreds of millions around the globe appreciate their HDR content.
"Hundreds of millions" is a generous assumption of people that use HDR. Even if there was that many people using it there simply isn't that much content out there right now. I would love a world where HDR was that readily available.
 
Last edited:
"Hundreds of millions" is a generous assumption of people that use HDR. Even if there was that many people using it there simply isn't that much content out there right now. I would love a world where HDR was that readily available.
There are around 80 mobile devices that currently support HDR. Just between Samsung's S20+ and Apple's recent iPhones, there are tens of millions of HDR capable devices in the hands of users worldwide. But that is all irrelevant for the purposes of our discussion. The fact is, YouTube HDR quality is pretty sensational. I watch it on an LG OLED and iPhone 12 Pro Max all the time and the picture has amazing clarity and few compression artifacts. If it does not look good, it is because you have a bad internet connection, not because YouTube HDR isn't exceptional. As for the true number of viewers, just one HDR video can easily attract tens of millions of views in the space of just a few years.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.