A bunch of complainers in here. Sheesh!
Most shows on TV have ads, so maybe they should get rid of that too
I also like how in CT they have a law that forces the volume of commercials to be equal to or less than that of the show.
I wish they did that here; there's a guideline of some sort but not all of the channels abide by it.
On the commercial channels, the amount of airtime allowed by the UK broadcasting regulator Ofcom for advertising is an overall average of 7 minutes per hour, with limits of 12 minutes for any particular clock hour (8 minutes per hour between 6pm and 11pm).
The guidelines are quite strict in the UK, with an average of 7 minutes per hour allowed.
I ususally look away when the ads pop up on my iPhone anyways.
The guidelines are quite strict in the UK, with an average of 7 minutes per hour allowed.
[/COLOR]Cant get all of the other streaming services here in poland like netflix etc
Are you sure? I thought it was up to 12 minutes per hour, especially on Pay TV.
The average 1 hour programme made for commercial TV is approximately 42 minutes long. This is verified when you watch the clock when forwarding anything on SKY+, or watch on Netflix etc.
I know that there are schedule announcements and promos, but not 11 minutes worth with only 7 minutes of Adverts surely? I also thought the 7 minute thing was a guideline, or something that Ofcom were working towards.
A bunch of complainers in here. Sheesh!
Most shows on TV have ads, so maybe they should get rid of that too
You get annoyed, yet your brain still hears the ad and processes it.
I'm just thankful that AdBlock on Cydia works in the app
I also use my dd-wrt router to block ads for all devices by returning 0.0.0.0 for the IP when an ad is called. Any protocol, any port, always.
I just safari. Rarely do I see an add.
Most shows on TV have ads, so maybe they should get rid of that too
Don't say that! Next thing you know they'll be adding facial recognition that makes sure you watch them.
I understand why Apple dropped the native stock app but by doing so they have created an increased ad revenue for Google!
Wonder if the trade off is worth it?
I guess I wouldn't want a competitors product shipped integrated with my product either even if not doing so made them more $!
This Youtube App is the last trace I have of anything google on my iPad. And am very close to removing this as well. These extra ads might be the tipping point. I buy bandwidth and google is telling me what I should be doing with the bandwidth I paid for. If I told google what to do with the things it purchases, I'd be told to **** off. But they can do this exact thing to us all.
The only power we have is not to use the youtube iOS app anymore.
Apple won't go as far as Samsung. Just imagine if the S4 had that feature >.<
At least it's not as bad as Hulu. An ad to start, then the opening credits, then 3-4 more ads... Bafflingly, they also put an ad block ...
A bunch of complainers in here. Sheesh!
The baffling thing about Hulu is people actually pay to watch ad infested programs. Why????? There are other ways to get the same content without the annoyance factor.
TV doesn't count. It's an outdated, archaic media model. Built on ads originally to keep it up and running. However paying for cable well, a conversation for later.
As for YouTube - the data plan I PAY for on my mobile phone is mine. I should not have to PAY to watch ****** ads on a mobile device. I don't support ad supported apps at all. I'm not a walking billboard. Either give me an option to pay NOT to see it or don't waste my data.
Same with Hulu+. $8 dollars a month and still sit through ads. How the hell does that work? I am better off torrenting what I want to watch WITHOUT ADS and other BS. Free. Again, using my data that I pay for to show your ads that again, I pay for.
It's a ****** dynamic.
I don't understand, you don't think you should have to pay for a service that you wish to use?
If you want general internet connectivity on a mobile device, you must pay a carrier who has a network of towers and infrastructure so that you can have access even as you move around town.
You seem to understand and accept that part. However,
If you want access to YouTube, you must pay Google who has a series of datacenters where they host and serve content to any customer at any time.
Why should paying carriers to use their network exempt you from paying Google to use their datacenters?