I forgot they made that damn teams native just for that Pro X okay MS now M1 as for the camera yall are tripping...this 720p camera with also ISP enhancements powered by M1 neural engine I look phenomenal in this call rn coming from my Air which had that garbage camera but for this is more then fine for the purpose to video call.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Zoom Video Calls Drain Apple M1 MacBook Air Battery by Only 10-13% Per Hour
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
M1 webcam is less crappy but still night and day difference when compared with Surface Pro X.
Macbook Air M1 vs i7 2020
Surface Pro X SQ2
Yes! It’s so frustrating and more so that it seems to not really bother others at all. In Reddit, there’s a tiny group of us plagued by this. Zoom supposedly acknowledged it and is working on it. No fix so far. Sigh.
8am to 11:15am this morning on Zoom. 55 minutes per session with 5 minute break between the next and battery still at 76%.
The first 55 minute call only used 4% battery. Nothing else open and no fancy effects or screen sharing was used though.
Still, very very impressive!
EDIT: This is with a MPB
The first 55 minute call only used 4% battery. Nothing else open and no fancy effects or screen sharing was used though.
Still, very very impressive!
EDIT: This is with a MPB
2020 iMac 1080 cam is the same size of the 720p in previous gen. Also the iPad Pro cam is pretty small and would fit fine in any of their laptops..
Ok I’m gonna go out on a limb here, is the iMac module physically bigger than the the ones in MacBooks?
The IPP has the entire FaceID assembly (which really should be in the M1 laptops).
I've been nerding out on battery life tests between a ThinkPad Yoga L13 (10th gen Intel Comet Lake) and the new M1-based MacBook Air 8/512 with 8-core iGPU. I used a mixed typical-office workday with about 3 of the last 5 hours on zoom. Yes, I signed into Zoom on both devices, and yes, I got a lot of funny looks for it 
Same (eyeballing) screen brightness on both devices. Doing my best to make the load identical as best I can. Typical office-based workload, Edge on the PC, Safari on the Mac. Gmail in browser on both. Slack in the browser on Mac, Slack client on PC. Both have 8GB.
The data I've seen about 10%-15% per hour battery drain on MBA with Zoom seems right. With this workload, I think I'll be looking at around 7-8 hours with this use case, which is good but not as good as I expected. What is surprising is that this is about the same amount of power draw on the ThinkPad, which obviously doesn't have an ARM chip and which has an even smaller size LiIon battery than the MacBook.
Zoom must be more optimized for the PC vs. the Rosetta 2 emulation on M1. Still, there are plenty of PC-based Ultrabooks that can deliver same or even BETTER battery life than this with a typical 'office" workload.
Unfortunately my takeaway from this test (which I did twice with similar results - but not scientific) is that the M1 MBA is a remarkable upgrade from the (lets be honest, underwhelming) Intel-based MBA, but for typical office-type Zoom-heavy use it is not the battery game-changer I thought it would be. I would bet that an HP Spectre x360, HP Elite Dragonfly, Yoga C940, Surface Pro X would all have actually done better on this test than the M1 MacBook Air. The ThinkPad L13 has a relatively tiny 46,000 mAh battery). Let's hope an M1/ARM-Native Zoom is more battery efficient than the current Zoom.
Same (eyeballing) screen brightness on both devices. Doing my best to make the load identical as best I can. Typical office-based workload, Edge on the PC, Safari on the Mac. Gmail in browser on both. Slack in the browser on Mac, Slack client on PC. Both have 8GB.
The data I've seen about 10%-15% per hour battery drain on MBA with Zoom seems right. With this workload, I think I'll be looking at around 7-8 hours with this use case, which is good but not as good as I expected. What is surprising is that this is about the same amount of power draw on the ThinkPad, which obviously doesn't have an ARM chip and which has an even smaller size LiIon battery than the MacBook.
- Hour # - MBA % / THKPD %
- Hour 1 - 90 / 90 <-----this is where I started the test
- Hour 2 - 82 / 84
- Hour 2 - 70 / 69
- Hour 3 - 53 / 48
- Hour 4 - 32 /28
- Hour 5 - 22 / 19
- Hour 6 - 4 / XX (PC abruptly went to sleep 45 min into hour 6 with 7% battery left during a Zoom call, then woke itself and showed 5%) <----stopped test
Zoom must be more optimized for the PC vs. the Rosetta 2 emulation on M1. Still, there are plenty of PC-based Ultrabooks that can deliver same or even BETTER battery life than this with a typical 'office" workload.
Unfortunately my takeaway from this test (which I did twice with similar results - but not scientific) is that the M1 MBA is a remarkable upgrade from the (lets be honest, underwhelming) Intel-based MBA, but for typical office-type Zoom-heavy use it is not the battery game-changer I thought it would be. I would bet that an HP Spectre x360, HP Elite Dragonfly, Yoga C940, Surface Pro X would all have actually done better on this test than the M1 MacBook Air. The ThinkPad L13 has a relatively tiny 46,000 mAh battery). Let's hope an M1/ARM-Native Zoom is more battery efficient than the current Zoom.
Last edited:
I think, when Zoom is optimised for M1, that it will be better than the Thinkpad.
As usable as zoom might be with rosetta 2, I am still waiting eagerly for a native build for m1...
My use is quite power hungry, and it seems all I can do without a power adapter is 2 and a half hours with my new m1 macbook air, not much more...
Maybe with a native build will I be able to go past the three hours that I sometimes need (or a macbook pro might have been a better choice, but I really didn't want the touchbar...)
I am conferencing with an ipad connected to the macbook, not charging, and the macbook sharing the screen of the ipad to a video projector and to zoom. As for internet connection, I get it from my iphone either through wifi (where I eat about 33% of battery per hour) or by cable (where the iphone is then charging, and the macbook is depleting its battery around 38% per hour...)
Of course, with the 2012 retina macbook pro the ipad air is replacing, I wouldn't have dreamt conferencing without the power brick, and the fans always ran full speed... Despite the battery being quite healthy, as it has been changed 2 years ago, I don't suppose the 2012 macbook would have lasted one hour in this scenario.
So I suppose I will still bring with me the power brick with the air, but I've still managed to reduce the weight of my backpack by a healthy amount !
P.S. : a cheap usb-c to 7 ports adapter, including 3 usb-3, hdmi and memory card is doing a fine job complementing the air...
My use is quite power hungry, and it seems all I can do without a power adapter is 2 and a half hours with my new m1 macbook air, not much more...
Maybe with a native build will I be able to go past the three hours that I sometimes need (or a macbook pro might have been a better choice, but I really didn't want the touchbar...)
I am conferencing with an ipad connected to the macbook, not charging, and the macbook sharing the screen of the ipad to a video projector and to zoom. As for internet connection, I get it from my iphone either through wifi (where I eat about 33% of battery per hour) or by cable (where the iphone is then charging, and the macbook is depleting its battery around 38% per hour...)
Of course, with the 2012 retina macbook pro the ipad air is replacing, I wouldn't have dreamt conferencing without the power brick, and the fans always ran full speed... Despite the battery being quite healthy, as it has been changed 2 years ago, I don't suppose the 2012 macbook would have lasted one hour in this scenario.
So I suppose I will still bring with me the power brick with the air, but I've still managed to reduce the weight of my backpack by a healthy amount !
P.S. : a cheap usb-c to 7 ports adapter, including 3 usb-3, hdmi and memory card is doing a fine job complementing the air...
Is that an app or the default of battery on m1 with that screenshot? Either way, it looks like you know when Apple is on the M1 (not the motorway), because all dialog boxes resemble that of the iPhone.
Hopelly this won't leave developers slacking off.."No point in updating a sluggish app, because it runs better on this hardware now"
Hopelly this won't leave developers slacking off.."No point in updating a sluggish app, because it runs better on this hardware now"
It works fine without I have green screen Ticked. Both a picture and video for virtual background. Same goes for the video filters too
I'm a teacher here, using Zoom on a 2018 MacBook Air for all of my classes while we are remote. With multiple Chrome tabs open and the Zoom app running a video call, my Air sounds like it's ready for takeoff and I get frequent slowdowns and the occasional beachball. Hearing how well the M1 Air handles Zoom, even through Rosetta, is encouraging. I'm currently holding out for an Apple Silicon iMac though to replace my 2013 iMac, so I think I'm just going to have to live with my 2018 Air and try to ignore the jet engine noise during all of my classes. :/
Has anyone noticed a measurable difference in Zoom performance and/or battery drain since the M1 update last week?
Decided to take the plunge...eBayed my 2018 Air and got the M1 Air about a week ago. I had my first Zoom call using the M1 Zoom update on Christmas day with five users, AirPlaying to my AppleTV as a second display. Battery went from 100% to about 93% after about 45 minutes. Connection dropped a few times, and normally my router is pretty consistent, so not sure if that was the app, the MacBook's wifi, or if it was the router/modem, but further testing is needed.
Just did another family Zoom on my M1 Air, about a dozen users connected, over AirPlay again...2 hours of usage and the battery went from 100% to 75%. Not too bad. My guess is most of that drain is as a result of Zoom driving a two-monitor setup, so we'd probably be looking at even less battery usage had the call just occurred on the built-in display.
Of course, totally silent and the computer is not even warm. Pretty mind-blowing what Apple is accomplishing with these chips.
Of course, totally silent and the computer is not even warm. Pretty mind-blowing what Apple is accomplishing with these chips.