You do realize that more consumers buy non Apple computers than they do Apple computers, don't you?
There's always a market for the cheap and disposable. That will never change.
You do realize that more consumers buy non Apple computers than they do Apple computers, don't you?
seriously, all Samsung needs is a killer operating system that rivals Android OS with functionality, and has the ease of use of iOS, and they can be serious competitors to the trending walled gardens we are seeing. Bada OS doesn't cut it.
You know what Samsung needs to do? Stop messing with Bada crap and make a tablet for Windows 8. Do you think Sammy could ever code an OS from the ground-up as good as MSFT? MSFT + Samsung seems to me a marriage made in heaven!
You know what Samsung needs to do? Stop messing with Bada crap and make a tablet for Windows 8. Do you think Sammy could ever code an OS from the ground-up as good as MSFT? MSFT + Samsung seems to me a marriage made in heaven!
Samsung did. The Win8 tablets MS gave away in the recent dev conference was from samsung. One with beastly spec.
They sell hw with android, Bada, Win8. And provide critical parts for iOS stuff.
There's always a market for the cheap and disposable. That will never change.
I think Sammy can easily replace the $7 billion of Apple with their own Windows 8 tablet + supplying components to other OEMs. No problem, as the market is thirsting for an iPad alternative!
Nokia was the one which wanted to go to court, it was Apple that wanted to settled down.
And why has to be disclosed what anyone pays for FRAND? No one pays the same amount
There's always a market for the cheap and disposable. That will never change.
Really, Everything I have read is that no claims have been slashed, so far oracle patents are valid, and google couldn't get the copyright part of the case thrown out. Obviously you haven't read the public transcripts.
Go spend a week reading fosspatents rather than one PCMag article if you want to find in depth analysis.
I think Apple has bitten off more then it can chew now. Obviously Samsung has just had enough and is going to hit them where it hurts. But it has to be remembered it's Korean, a lot of the other companies suing Apple or Apple is suing are also from that part of the world. So if Apple gets a reputation of being difficult to deal with, then who do they think is going to deal with them?
Sure Apple spends loads of money, but if that money comes with hassle and stress and possibilities of having your own products taken of sale, then your not going to deal with them are you.
Then again you can alway's save Apples money up to spend on your defence or case.
Anyway pot kettle black is a phrase that comes to mind with this, Apple is going to need luck with this one. Just launch the iPhone 5 first though
You do realize that more consumers buy non Apple computers than they do Apple computers, don't you?
Apple is getting a bad reputation in Korea. MSFT has been very kind to Asia in general and I can see them benefiting!
No problem, as the market is thirsting for an iPad alternative!
Is it?
If the market was really "thirsting" for an iPad alternative, it would have snapped up the TouchPad and the Playbook.
But it didn't. They lingered on store shelves, dusty and unwanted, until the prices got slashed.
A lot of people who, for whatever reason, don't like Apple, seem to be putting their hopes in Windows 8 somehow succeding where Android and WebOS and QNS failed. I think they are going to be mistaken.
Because nobody really likes Microsoft. And nobody really likes Samsung either. But more importantly, nobody (sane) is going to go out and waste $500 or $600 just to "stick it" to Steve Jobs and the folks at Apple. They are going to say: "Do I spend $500 on an iPad - for which there is all this wonderful software. That works with my iPhone and my Itunes library. That I KNOW just works. Or do I go and spend the same $500 and buy myself the same heaches I've tolerated from Windows all these years. Do I buy myself a Samsung, with an incomprehensible manual like the one that came with the LCD TV set and DVD player I bought."
Sensible people don't buy computer products out of spite.
Has anyone seen this phone before? I finally found out the model after scratching my head seeing someone use it on the bus. I couldn't take my eyes off it because it looked so much like an iPhone no matter how long I looked.
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_ace_s5830-review-558p2.php
Image
Image
Oracle's lawsuit is crumbling. Their claims have been slashed, their patents found invalid and their damage awards severely reduced. And they are still in the process of discovery, they haven't even reached trial yet.
I wouldn't count on Oracle too much.
Yes the Samsung Galaxy S II is a total ripoff and should not be allowed to be sold. End of story.
As I said, you only look at sales figures if supports your Apple is king viewpoint. If another companies sales figures are greater, you dismiss it as irrelevant and that only the categories concerning Apple are what matter. And only you are capable of deciding which ones matter. Like I said, it sounds a bit hypocritical to me, but what do I know, I'm open minded?