Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Adoption rate: graphs of recent traffic

Back on topic … we're not at the three-week mark yet, but traffic might be settling around an average of twenty-five percent, measured by GoSquared …
 

Attachments

  • 2014-11-06 00-22-44 screenshot.png
    2014-11-06 00-22-44 screenshot.png
    127.4 KB · Views: 138
  • 2014-11-06 00-23-00 screenshot.png
    2014-11-06 00-23-00 screenshot.png
    114 KB · Views: 103
I'm getting improved performance with Yosemite on my mid 2011 iMac, 2.7mhz 12 gigs. and 250 SSD.

Faster than Mavericks. I'm usually apprehensive about system updates on older machines. I had a bad experience going from 10.4 to 10.5 on an older powerbook. Slowed it up a lot. But Yosemite is clean looking, faster, and has some nice features. And Safari is now my fastest browser. I've had no stability issues. No restarts needed.

It also came on the new mac mini hooked up to my TV (8gigs). Just as as fast and no issues. I'm running some oddball stuff, Vuze, popcorn time, VLC, that you don't often see on some mac systems. Even those open source things are running cleanly. All and all I'm very satisfied.

Totally agree.....for me Yosemite is the best 10.X operating system. It's up there with 9.2 in terms of speed (snapinest).
late 2012 27" iMac maxed out..32GB RAM
 
i agree totally - what's yours look like? i get gray pixel streaks down finder windows that are compiling a new list (like from switching folders in the sidebar).. i use the 1680 resolution and have automatic graphics switching disabled because i'm afraid of it (having had kernel panic problems in the past). hoping things smooth out graphically, cause everything else i've tried works perfectly.

----------



my experience with Lion and Mavericks kinda blew, but i feel like yosemite is more on par with snow leopard in terms of stability

Front Row and Rosetta...why did they have to remove it?

Again, the new "Flat" design is a big no go for me...
 
I'm still not ready to upgrade yet. I bought my Mac Mini two months ago and upgraded it to Mavericks. I'm happy with that. I'm still running the previous version of iTunes because I'm not ready to give up the side pane.
 
I'm still not ready to upgrade yet. I bought my Mac Mini two months ago and upgraded it to Mavericks. I'm happy with that. I'm still running the previous version of iTunes because I'm not ready to give up the side pane.

Don't upgrade until the next update is applied, you'd be better off
 
… The statistics of GoSquared shows almost no growth in Yosemite adoption. As it's weekend time and some might try their luck with Yosemite, the adoption spikes near 30% for the first time. But it's very likely this number will fall again.

I think Apple is well aware of these facts.

Agreed.

Also, the peak-above-peak measurements –
28.27% (Tuesday 2014-10-21),
29.10% (Friday 2014-10-31), and so on; and sometimes there's a measurement above the peak above a peak (first and second screenshots below).

attachment.php


attachment.php


…*the measurement of greater than one hundred percent may be taken as a hint to not take these measurements too seriously :)

Ignoring initial rush, slope is about 0.79% per day.
Should hit 50% by Dec 5 or so, unless there's a large population of what Apple would call "incurable reactionaries."

I never measured the slope for Mavericks, here's a graph:

 

Attachments

  • 2014-11-08 15-52-14 screenshot.png
    2014-11-08 15-52-14 screenshot.png
    120.9 KB · Views: 314
  • 2014-11-08 15-52-34 screenshot.png
    2014-11-08 15-52-34 screenshot.png
    104.1 KB · Views: 372
  • 2014-11-08 16-15-47 screenshot.png
    2014-11-08 16-15-47 screenshot.png
    102 KB · Views: 114
GoSquared measurements from 2014-11-28 and 2014-11-30

I think that the most reasonable explanation is that the swings represent pings from different continents/timezones (or maybe also private vs work machines?). It would be really nice to actually get the raw data from gosquared though. …

For the daily peaks in Mavericks traffic, I had similar guesses. Not exactly pings … I assume that the platform detection is web browser-oriented.

The raw data might be purchased but I don't expect it to be published.

2014-11-28 00-54-44 screenshot.png


2014-11-28 00-55-01 screenshot.png


2014-11-30 15-19-25 screenshot.png
 

Attachments

  • 2014-11-28 00-54-44 screenshot.png
    2014-11-28 00-54-44 screenshot.png
    165.5 KB · Views: 340
  • 2014-11-28 00-55-01 screenshot.png
    2014-11-28 00-55-01 screenshot.png
    151.6 KB · Views: 339
  • 2014-11-30 15-19-25 screenshot.png
    2014-11-30 15-19-25 screenshot.png
    198.3 KB · Views: 337
Adoption rates around the times of release of 10.9.1 and 10.10.1

… I looked at GoSquared and it looks like Yosemite's rise has pretty much leveled off at 40%, which is still pretty high. The curve shows what might be a reverse migration back to Mavericks occurring, but it's so small and over such a short period of time it might just be an oddity.

If you scroll down to the bottom of the GoSquared page, there's link to see Mavericks adoption rate. If you look at it, Mavericks went flat between May and July at approximately 50-55%, then it resumed its rise to top out in the 65-69% range.

Sales typically go flat during the summer, and go up during the fall, and especially around Christmas. Assuming new Apple systems all have Yosemite installed, it's possible their adoption might be somewhat inflated due to a holiday season blitz. Also you can't tell how many are not using Yosemite because of appearance or bugs with the OS.

Time will tell. If the Yosemite adoption rate starts going down with all the rest going up, probably Mavericks being the most likely to recover, then it would be a clear indication with dissatisfaction of the OS.

When I took the June 2014 screenshot of the GoSquared measurement of Mavericks –

attachment.php


– I didn't give much thought to the leap of around nine percent in mid-December 2013. In retrospect, I guess that it represented:
  • the self-restraint, the caution, that people showed before the 2013-12-16 release of OS X 10.9.1
  • a relatively carefree rush to install 10.9.1.
No such leap with Yosemite, no carefree rush following the mid-November 2014 release of OS X 10.10.1.

I don't imagine a nine percent leap when 10.10.2 is released.

Carefree no more? The changes to the Mac experience are quite saddening.
 
The last thirty days

Ignoring Thanksgiving and the regular morning data blip, Yosemite adoption looks to be increasing linearly since mid October. It's now surpassed Mavericks, and shows no sign of a "disatisfied customer base" plateau. …

If there was a linear increase in the last thirty days, I can't see it:
 

Attachments

  • 2015-01-22 21-18-12 screenshot.png
    2015-01-22 21-18-12 screenshot.png
    142 KB · Views: 111
Safari has gotten really bad, hanging on sites forever, spinning ball, crashing.
I'm going to have to switch browsers if their next update doesn't fix things but I really don't want to.
Apple, you don't have enough money to pay people smart enough to fix what you broke with Yosemite?
Pathetic
 
Related topics (orientation)

Safari … hanging … spinning ball,
crashing.

There are a few topics about crashes of Safari 8.

Please post details to the Yosemite sub-forum.

… enough money to pay people smart enough …

There's neither a shortage of money nor a shortage of smart people.
 

I will check those out, thanks.
If the money and smart people are there it shouldn't take this long to fix it, IMO and shouldn't have been released to the wild half baked
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.