Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
You can install them all, but I don't know if having four GPUs would exceed the power draw. I don't think so, but it never hurts to check.

(before someone whines, "Why didn't YOU check!" the answer is I'm busy, I have other things I want to do, and the OP is equally as capable as I am of looking up the pertinent info)
 
Obviously you can run 4 2600XT's and be within the limit, but the 8800GT takes a lot more power. I'd go out on a limb and guess that 3 of those and an 8800GT exceeds the draw.
 
A quick google said a 2600 idled at 125 or so. I know Apple's is underclocked, but it's not that underclocked.
 
I have 2 Ati 2600's installed right now, but over the next few years I want a system that has 8, 30 inch ACD's but I also want performance for games, So I was hoping I could use the 8800 for COD 4 and the others to just drive displays.

Also I don't think the 2600's use 125 idle because how could I use 4 then?

Anyone using 2 ati 2600's and an 8800?
 
...but over the next few years I want a system that has 8, 30 inch ACD's...

I demand pictures on the day that this happens.:D

Oh, and good luck actually GETTING it to happen, because unless you buy within the next couple of months, you won't be able to get any more 30" Cinema Displays new from Apple that you will be able to use with your Mac Pro.
 
I have 2 Ati 2600's installed right now, but over the next few years I want a system that has 8, 30 inch ACD's but I also want performance for games, So I was hoping I could use the 8800 for COD 4 and the others to just drive displays.

Okay, I'll bite.

If you've got the kind of cash to put down on such a comically unnecessary setup, then you ought to just buy a $5000 gaming PC with 12 of the latest GPUs in SLI or whatever and just forget about gaming on your Mac.

But in a few years, it'll be more worth your money to upgrade your Mac Pro than to spend $1000+ to increase your screen real estate from 29 to 33 million pixels, so I don't anticipate this actually being an issue.
 
I will give you a picture when you give me an answer :)

I currently dont have to cash but even if i did, how would I get the DVI cables to reach my pro.

First answer my original question, then the one i need answered in 10 years.
 
A quick google said a 2600 idled at 125 or so. I know Apple's is underclocked, but it's not that underclocked.

If you don't understand how to read information properly, don't regurgitate it all over this forum.

That is 125W for the ENTIRE system at idle, not only the card.

The card uses around 30-60 watts depending on the load.
 
If you don't understand how to read information properly, don't regurgitate it all over this forum.

That is 125W for the ENTIRE system at idle, not only the card.

The card uses around 30-60 watts depending on the load.

I have a hard time believing any Mac Pro configuration idles at 125w.
 
We're not talking about the Mac Pro in specific.

Just an example of a PC that is configured with a 2600XT.

Ok, that I'd have less trouble believing. My machine when I last plugged in a Kill A Watt was sitting pretty at around 450 watts :/
 
Remember the PowerPC Snow Leopard beta?

Oh, wait...:eek:

We're at a transitionary period of forced obsolescence. It'll pass.

PowerPC is a bit different. Supporting that is holding back advancement in software development. At this point I'm ok with abandoning the 32bit Core Duo chips if it'll cut back on the bloat.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.