I keep seeing people using this comparison, but price wise even w inflation is not even a close comparison for the gold watch.
Forget the gold models. Even $349 is too much for them.
I keep seeing people using this comparison, but price wise even w inflation is not even a close comparison for the gold watch.
I think it's just a matter of taste/preference. '61 Jaguar E-Type vs. 2015 Tesla, or whatever.
That may be the most intelligent comparison yet. Those cars (as in a Rolex vs Apple watch) are at completely different ends of the spectrum and both extremely desirable to automobile aficionados, and the person who owns a ';61 E-type probably has a Tesla S P85 in their stable as well. Old School sexy and high tech sexy. A new Rolex Day Date with the Presidential band will set you back about $30,000.....
As in a symbol of someone I do not want to talk to.
I can understand paying a high price for 'stylish' watches, but the Apple Watch is for function-- the cheaper model will be able to do the same thing as the higher end model and lets face it is-- it doesn't look that great. Not to mention high-end watches are for life, an Apple Watch will be obsolete within a year or two. If I saw someone wearing a 10k Apple Watch the first thing I would think is... what the heck is going through this persons mind? Why not actually get a good-looking, long lasting watch if you're throwing down that type of money? I would immediately start questioning the persons decision making skills and ego.
I really hope Apple knows what its doing with this because I don't think the market for rich out of touch nerds who wear 10k smartwatches will be that large.
$10,000 model only sports a RUBBER BAND. I am not talking to that person.
Or... you pay an extra $7,000 (total of $17,000) to have a proper leather band. And no respect for this person.
The money's better off going to charity if people are that rich to buy a disposable watch for that kind of money.
a replacement 18k gold band for a rolex costs about 9grand.
The leather is not gold. This is not a Rolex.
That may be the most intelligent comparison yet. Those cars (as in a Rolex vs Apple watch) are at completely different ends of the spectrum and both extremely desirable to automobile aficionados, and the person who owns a ';61 E-type probably has a Tesla S P85 in their stable as well. Old School sexy and high tech sexy. A new Rolex Day Date with the Presidential band will set you back about $30,000.....and WILL not let you see your investment portfolio by pressing the "crown"
i'm comparing prices. for leather thats ridiculous. what is it made from? a unicorn?
Apple is positioning itself next to Rolex when Rolex has history and reputation as a watch maker. So Apple makes a gold version and thinks it should charge the same amount? The difference is Apple doesn't carry the same weight as Swiss watch companies. It thinks it can but I just laugh. But that's just me.
Thanks. If I may, I'll leave a similar quote that I made six months ago on the Hodinkee blog, which encapsulates how I feel about it:
"As an owner of Rolex, Omega, Seiko, etc., mechanical watches are interesting to me, but they've never had to compete with wrist real estate in the past. The increased function of a smart watch, which, in Apple's case, is in a package that seems good enough, is making me reconsider just how important man jewelry is.
I kind of feel like I've been toiling away on my classic car in the garage for years, until one day, I say "screw it" and head towards the Tesla dealership. I can still go look at my classic car in the garage from time to time, or take it out for the occasional spin...although I may just sell the thing."
but 20yrs from now that rolex will still hold its value and resale price.
A dumbphone owner, circa 2007:
Very few people are going to lay down $599 for a cell phone with no physical keyboard that must be charged every night just to make calls, unless they happen to be a hardcore Apple enthusiast and/or a nerd seeking to show off.
Do we know that for sure? Rolex sells hundreds of thousands of watches per year, and there are millions upon millions of them on the market already. If smart watches take off, and they become as ubiquitous as smart phones, suddenly, there is a lot of wrist competition, which makes the future slightly hazier.
FWIW, if you go buy a new Rolex tomorrow, most models will take a hit on value once you walk out of the show room, like a car.
but they'll last.
do you really think this watch will last 10 years? definitely not.
That's the one and only reason to buy it.I'm buying it. Just so I can show you how rich I REALLY am.
They kind of last. You do realize that you have to take in a Rolex for a $600+ service every 5 years to keep it working? I think my last service came to $850, if I remember correctly. Either way, I'm not saying it won't last. I'm saying that it may not hold the value that we've become accustomed to the last 20 years. Buying a used Rolex in the 80s wasn't nearly the expensive endeavor that it is now.
In the end, it probably doesn't matter. The Watch is gunning for the Tissots of the world, which is the meat of the Swiss watch industry. The average Swiss watch price is around $750.
That's the one and only reason to buy it.
Most people know nothing about different watches or what they cost. You could own a $20,000 mechanical watch, but chances are only 1 in 30 people would notice.
On the other hand, walk down the street wearing your gold Apple Watch and everyone will know that you spent 17 THOUSAND DOLLARS on your watch.
Just make sure you don't walk by any alleys.
Imagine if they were offering platinum as well.