Not a problem thank you for explaining your situation.
It's just that if you want your rights trampeled on just abuse them. That is exactly what piraters are doing. The rest of us will pay for there unjust deeds.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
10.2.2 is out through Software Update...
- Thread starter Classic
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Not a problem thank you for explaining your situation.
It's just that if you want your rights trampeled on just abuse them. That is exactly what piraters are doing. The rest of us will pay for there unjust deeds.
The standalone download link has been miscoded.
the correct link for the incremental (not combo) update is:
http://download.info.apple.com/Mac_OS_X/061-0196.20021111.BnSP9/2Z/MacOSXUpdate10.2.2.dmg.bin
I don't have time to read all the posts so I apologise now if this has already been pointed out.
the correct link for the incremental (not combo) update is:
http://download.info.apple.com/Mac_OS_X/061-0196.20021111.BnSP9/2Z/MacOSXUpdate10.2.2.dmg.bin
I don't have time to read all the posts so I apologise now if this has already been pointed out.
IM still confused about the idea of pirating something that is free.....I dont understand that logic.
Just because it doesn't cost anything doesn't mean it's free.
Apple doesn't post beta releases to the general public but, rather, a select few ADC members. As part of the user agreement either with the download's EULA and/or through the ADC EULA these selected few are obligated to NOT give out Apple's IP which the beta release squarly falls-under.
Many people download these beta releases by means non-sanctioned by Apple. This, in effect, is theft of Apple's IP.
Is this the same thing as downloading Photoshop? Legally speaking (and IANAL), yes. Do you really think Apple cares that extra people are beta testing thier product? Probably not unless these people are dumb enough to call tech support and gripe that it broke thier system and you can be sure that there are more than a few with each beta release.
I've decided to spare you the rant about 'free-as-in-beer' vs. 'free-as-in-speech' software. Be happy.
Re: Re: Big improvement on Sherlock.
Thanks. I'll try that the next time I need to force re-start. I wonder why Apple chose not to include that button on the new iMacs. Did they think the iMacs would be invincible or what? Anyway, off the topic so no one need respond; just thinking out loud.
Thanks. I'll try that the next time I need to force re-start. I wonder why Apple chose not to include that button on the new iMacs. Did they think the iMacs would be invincible or what? Anyway, off the topic so no one need respond; just thinking out loud.
True, except the NTFS (and apparently HFS+) JFS implementations only journal disk-level file writes, not application-level file writes.
In other words, wheras with a database if you changed 100 rows and the power went out before you hit "commit", those rows would be lost (and if the power went out after you hit "commit" but before commit returned, the changes would be committed after power returns), if you open an existing file in NTFS, write a bunch of data, then the power goes out, when you get the machine back up you have a file with a bunch of new data, then a bunch of old data (which, generally speaking, means a file that is unusable).
So it's not quite like a database. The file allocation table (or whatever index you want to call it) is like a database, but not the file system itself.
On the other hand, perhaps Longhorn or Blackcomb (the 2003/4 and 2005 Windows releases ... one of which is supposed to reimplement the file system as a database) might fix that.
Has anyone had problems with the date and time since doing this update? Everytime I wake my old 400Mhz DV iMac up the date and time refuses to change from the time it last went to sleep- also Internet Connect wont work until I re-set it to the correct time. It didn't do this before 10.2.2.!
