I have posted this before... But I need to add to Duke's assertion that apple should not expect us to pay for OS10.2
OSX 10.0 claimed that it networked with legacy systems such as windows NT. It only half does... only for carbon apps.
OSX10.1 claimed that it improved its networking and claimed again that it networks with legacy systems.... It still doesn't
It has been a year and OSX in any version does not network with NT, even though you can restart the very same machine on the very same network into OS9 and it will work seemlessly.
If they charge for this upgrade... there are going to be some VERY pissed off IT managers. Especially in print houses where they have custom software that is still classic and set up for NT. The print industry that gave birth to Apple has been ignored by apple in the video generation.
this is my 2 cents...
not my $99 upgrade.
OSX 10.0 claimed that it networked with legacy systems such as windows NT. It only half does... only for carbon apps.
OSX10.1 claimed that it improved its networking and claimed again that it networks with legacy systems.... It still doesn't
It has been a year and OSX in any version does not network with NT, even though you can restart the very same machine on the very same network into OS9 and it will work seemlessly.
If they charge for this upgrade... there are going to be some VERY pissed off IT managers. Especially in print houses where they have custom software that is still classic and set up for NT. The print industry that gave birth to Apple has been ignored by apple in the video generation.
this is my 2 cents...
not my $99 upgrade.