Neuro said:I don't know why everyone is so concerned with OSX being hacked onto standard Intel hardware.
Not many 'normal' users would ever dream of downoading a hacked OS and using it as their every day environment. Hackers getting the OS running just gives it useful coverage.
debroglie said:Great, so the pirates have forced apple to concentrate on breaking piracy instead of concentrating all energy on optimizing the OS.
thanks 🙄
Neuro said:I don't know why everyone is so concerned with OSX being hacked onto standard Intel hardware.
Not many 'normal' users would ever dream of downoading a hacked OS and using it as their every day environment. Hackers getting the OS running just gives it useful coverage.
Would most hackers ever buy an OS anyway?
That's more than two bug fixes for each of the over 200 new features Tiger was supposed to include 😀Dr. Dastardly said:Wow! 500 bug fixes! This is the update most have been waiting for perhaps.
There are already some programs using fat binaries in the wild, and those would need to be rebuilt. It's all smallish stuff at the moment, and there is plenty of time for those programs' caretakers to get new builds out.But is this going to render all universal binaries useless? That sounds bad, is it bad? I'm confused. 😕
dernhelm said:OK - so it isn't 500 bug fixes in 10.4.3, it's 75, bringing the total from 10.4.0 upto 500.
Also the release is due at the _END_ of september at the _EARLIEST_.
Cheez, people, wording is everything...
SiliconAddict said:Can someone tell me if premier Apple developers are getting preferential treatment? Specifically are they getting builds that others are not?
I was talking to a friend over the weekend and he was telling me that the company he works for gets relatively routine builds of x86 Tiger. That was interesting because its the first Ive heard of such a thing. What was more distressing was that he told me that Tiger for x86 is severely lacking in certain areas, mainly API calls. Off the top of my head things like audio wasnt working among other things. (It was 11PM on Saturday, beer in hand. I dont remember the finer details of that evening.) I want to call BS on him but honestly this wouldnt be the first time Apple has played the whole smoke and mirrors game.
Does anyone have any insight into Tiger x86 and if any of this is true?
Then again he told me that Apple WAS without a doubt designing their mainboards from scratch not using any Intel reference designs. In that case I DID call BS on him. There is NO way in hell Apple is going to leak such info. But he remained adamant that he was told by someone at Apple that its a ground up build. Of course someone else could be BSing him. *shrugs*
Im uberly confused. At this point I'm guessing this is all ugly rumor but he seeded enough doubt that Im nervous about where Apple really is in their x86 development.
ZildjianKX said:I hope this fixes the iChat insufficient bandwidth error that 10.4.2 was suppose to fix... my iSight it utterly useless currently.
fatbarstard said:Here we have upgrade 3 to the last major release and they are looking at fixing 500 bugs??? That sounds like Apple was more focused on getting 10.4 out the door rather than get it right... a bad situation if that is how Apple is running software development...
BRLawyer said:Perhaps because you don't know how many "normal" Winblows users out there use pirated versions of Gates's system...of course they would download OS X if they could...after all, piracy exists because it's still easy to download, not because of the price (a very old myth indeed)...
Abstract said:Look how many "normal" users have a bootleg copy of Windows on their computer.
Not everyone has to be a hacker. All a guy needs is a friend, younger brother, or a friends friend who downloads software, and lots of people can share the disk.
Trust me when I say that when I had a PC, I had never paid for Windows, Office, or any piece of software on my PC in my entire life. Ever. Funny thing is that I don't know anything about hacks or software piracy or where to get this stuff.
Doctor Q said:These 500 bugs are probably in newer software, not in software that has been stable through previous O.S. releases. Therefore, using 129 as the number of new features in a major O.S. release (based on previous Apple ads matching the price to the number of features), we can divide 500 bugs by 129 features to compute an average of about 3.9 bugs per feature.
tiiim said:and anyways "normal" people dont need to worry about those "horror" mac os x stories. Trust me you can your hand on that intel mac it will be singing away and will make the PPC look like a pentium 1 (no pun intended 😉 )
ok maybe not that bad. But the tech specs for intel macs are fantastic the new technology that intel are introducing (and that everyone in the PC industry is not paying attention too accept apple) are great. Everyone is running after super fast and very hot amd. Wait to Apple shows off intel's hidden technology then the chip battle will get very interesting. More Ghz does not always mean faster chips.... (perfomance by watt anyone?).
kainjow said:They probably changed the format of the universal binaries, so that when you double click them it may do some more piracy checking, to see if the app is running on the right hardware. (only an idea)
Or it's gotta be something major like that for all Xcode 2.1 universal binaries to not run at all.
BRLawyer said:Perhaps because you don't know how many "normal" Winblows users out there use pirated versions of Gates's system...of course they would download OS X if they could...after all, piracy exists because it's still easy to download, not because of the price (a very old myth indeed)...
Neuro said:Perhaps users won't be able to run software update unless their installed version checks out as valid. Microsoft is heading exactly the same way with Windows now (Genuine Advantage program).
Basically, to run a hacked copy will be a liability in terms of performance and stability.
Also, I'd just like to add that I've never bought a copy of Windows (a PC user of 10+ years), but I've bought every version of Mac OS X. In my eyes it's worth the money, which makes a huge difference to me opening my wallet.
BRLawyer said:Sorry, Neuro, but the sheer acknowledgement of the fact that you've never paid for a copy of Windows just proves that pirates and hackers will NEVER pay for OS X as well, as most of the ordinary users, no matter how "insecure" or "unreliable" software update is...the price myth has been debunked a long time ago in regards to piracy, and even cheap shareware is pirated as hell whenever possible.
And if it were a matter of quality, no good games, applications or OSs would ever be copied in such a widespread manner; it's just easy, that's why people do it...once they have'em in their HDs, the urge for legitimate payment of a company's R&D and marketing simply vanishes...and that's why Apple must keep on fighting the virtual thieves...simple as that.
SiliconAddict said:Can someone tell me if premier Apple developers are getting preferential treatment? Specifically are they getting builds that others are not?
I was talking to a friend over the weekend and he was telling me that the company he works for gets relatively routine builds of x86 Tiger. That was interesting because its the first Ive heard of such a thing. What was more distressing was that he told me that Tiger for x86 is severely lacking in certain areas, mainly API calls. Off the top of my head things like audio wasnt working among other things. (It was 11PM on Saturday, beer in hand. I dont remember the finer details of that evening.) I want to call BS on him but honestly this wouldnt be the first time Apple has played the whole smoke and mirrors game.
Does anyone have any insight into Tiger x86 and if any of this is true?
Then again he told me that Apple WAS without a doubt designing their mainboards from scratch not using any Intel reference designs. In that case I DID call BS on him. There is NO way in hell Apple is going to leak such info. But he remained adamant that he was told by someone at Apple that its a ground up build. Of course someone else could be BSing him. *shrugs*
Im uberly confused. At this point I'm guessing this is all ugly rumor but he seeded enough doubt that Im nervous about where Apple really is in their x86 development.
Gilles said:When can I expect to put my hand on a MacTel machine? end of 2006?
Apple's been telling developers exactly which chips will be in the first MacIntels, and they are currently available chips.wdlove said:It's possible that the Intel Mac could be announced at MWSF in January '06.