Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
A shame they didn't add a loop of some sort, but I'm sure the money they got from people buying AirTag accessories was too good to pass up.
 
Daft question but precision finding on watch, is that supposed to be limited to new airpods or work on old ones? can't get it working on my originals even though updated watch
 
I remain mildly curious why Apple continues to call this out, since there's nothing as far as I can tell that would pose any risk to a pet that's greater than if it weren't attached to their collar. People put tags and bells on their pet collars all the time, how is a similar-sized AirTag that emits a minuscule amount of radiation any different?
I've got two Border Terriers and they'd be utterly useless for tracking them. Very high prey drive and when that kicks in and they tear off after wildlife in the middle of a forest, no way you're tracking them with an Airtag when the population around you is 95% rabbit and none of them have an iPhone to mesh the signal everywhere. One of mine hoofed off for an hour or so after deer, no way we'd have found him without a real tracker.

Tractiv is what I have on them - not cheap by any stretch, but very much what _should_ be used on pets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Galas
I've got two Border Terriers and they'd be utterly useless for tracking them. Very high prey drive and when that kicks in and they tear off after wildlife in the middle of a forest, no way you're tracking them with an Airtag when the population around you is 95% rabbit and none of them have an iPhone to mesh the signal everywhere. One of mine hoofed off for an hour or so after deer, no way we'd have found him without a real tracker.

Tractiv is what I have on them - not cheap by any stretch, but very much what _should_ be used on pets.
This is why Apple says this tech is not designed for keeping track of animals.
 
I'm not sure that current technology allows a small, low-energy tracker with GPS connectivity.
3-4 weeks battery life on the Tractiv dog trackers, they're about the size of a couple of AA batteries... battery life drops if you enable full tracking (GPS and mobile) and should be recharged regularly if so. Just not possible to have something with that tech inside at the size of the Airtags and have run more than a few days (if that) on battery.
 
  • Like
Reactions: erihp
I've seen people with the same breed who have Airtags on theirs... I do wonder why they even bother.
Would help if they wander off in a neighborhood/urban setting. A cheap extra insurance at finding them in that case. Or if someone else finds them and needs to identify the owner.
 
it would be thicker with solid state battery
Ok so now it’s (much) bigger and needs to be charged every 3 days. We still talking about an AirTag? I don’t think you understand the use case. That said, you -can- buy a small GPS tracker from other companies, it’s just not the same thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zombierunner
I ordered 4 AirTags2.0 for my upcoming flight. BUT suddenly I realized that most of the people wont upgrade to 26.2.1 and it be mostly useless next couple weeks or may be month.
 
AppleInsider says 50% further range, MR is saying 1.5 (150%) further. I think MR has their math (or words) wrong. ie. 1.5x further would be 250m, assuming the original AirTag was 100m as an example.
But what is that range? 10 feet, 20 feet, 150 yds? Guess will know when it comes out and people test. Was hoping Apple would make it smaller and skinnier too.
 
So, no improvement at all i would say.
Better range is only for Precision finding.
i'd like to see better battery life and better range overall (with Bluetooth 6.0+)
 
  • Like
Reactions: erihp
I ordered 4 AirTags2.0 for my upcoming flight. BUT suddenly I realized that most of the people wont upgrade to 26.2.1 and it be mostly useless next couple weeks or may be month.
Not how it works. Other people’s devices do not need to be on 26 to see the Bluetooth broadcast used for reporting seeing your AirTag. The client side behavior doesn’t change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: b17777
So, no improvement at all i would say.
Better range is only for Precision finding.
i'd like to see better battery life and better range overall (with Bluetooth 6.0+)
Better battery life is tough given how long it already lasts on a single cr2032.
 
Sorry Apple I know it’s not for pets but I find it too useful when this little monster is hiding!

IMG_1438.jpeg
 
I noticed that energizer put the printed bitter dots in a different place so I'm not having to scrub them off with alcohol for an hour before I put them in
Holy smokes, is THAT why those batteries never worked? I always thought it was the coating itself and not printed dots. I've been using some generic brand from Amazon, which are fine, but don't carry the battery life that Energizers do...
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.