Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

06Honda

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 25, 2011
247
4
Just switched over from windows and would like some advice on a antivirus program for my new MacPro Laptop. Thanks for any help.
 

GGJstudios

macrumors Westmere
May 16, 2008
44,545
943
Just switched over from windows and would like some advice on a antivirus program for my new MacPro Laptop. Thanks for any help.
You don't need any antivirus software to protect Mac OS X from malware. No viruses exist in the wild that can run on Mac OS X, and there never have been any, since it was released 10 years ago. The handful of trojans that exist can be easily avoided with some basic education, common sense and care in what software you install:
 

old-wiz

macrumors G3
Mar 26, 2008
8,331
228
West Suburban Boston Ma
None are needed. There are no viruses in the world that hit OSx.
That's one of the nice things about OSx; don't worry about viruses.
You still need to use common sense and not install "codecs" from shady sites, but you still need to enter your admin password to allow installs.
 

thebignewt

macrumors regular
Jun 10, 2011
119
0
But people will sure sell you antivirus software. Bestbuy was all over my s*#t to buy it.
 

RobertsonCrusoe

macrumors member
Jul 21, 2011
34
0
Just switched over from windows and would like some advice on a antivirus program for my new MacPro Laptop. Thanks for any help.

lol at people that don't get AV for there new $1000+ mac. i would recommend clamxav (free) or if you want to pay get virus barrier.

It's simple. People say you mac's don't get viruses. But if you buy a million dollar watch that people say is unbreakable, would you through it at the ground continuously? of coarse not. It is better to get an anti virus like virus barrier or if you don't want to pay clamxav and run it. If it doesn't pick up viruses Good. it is better then having none altogether.
 

GGJstudios

macrumors Westmere
May 16, 2008
44,545
943
It's simple. People say you mac's don't get viruses.
That's because none exist in the wild that can run on Mac OS X.
But if you buy a million dollar watch that people say is unbreakable, would you through it at the ground continuously?
A Mac is neither worth a million dollars, nor is it a watch, nor is running a Mac without AV analogous to throwing it on the ground.
It is better to get an anti virus like virus barrier or if you don't want to pay clamxav and run it. If it doesn't pick up viruses Good. it is better then having none altogether.
Not really. Antivirus apps use system resources and cannot protect you from a Mac virus, since they don't know what to look for.

All you need to protect your Mac from malware is one rule: only install known software that you intended to install from trusted, reputable sites. That's it.
 

Trebuin

macrumors 65816
Jun 3, 2008
1,494
272
Central Cali
Macs do have destructive programs...I've run into a non-replicating virus wrapped in a legit program that does a great job wiping your hard drive. Took me all day to recover, and lost about half the stuff. It's not a virus in the sense that it is not designed to replicate, but it will do heavy damage. After this incident, I did a little research and found another that does an excellent job conducting a low level format of your hard drive to reduce the hard drive size to almost nothing in size. It was based on an early 1990's debug code that was used for virus definition training on windows.

So yes, there are viruses for osx, but they are few and far between and in the two cases I found, you enter your admin password to run...just make sure you're running a legit program. If the company is hacked...in my first case...then only AV can protect you.

As far as antivirus, I think that every reseller pretty much takes advantage of the buyers by providing a product that they never update (for OSX viruses) or bloat with windows definitions, which bogs down your system. This is why the Mac Defender virus was such a problem.

I would personally check your cable provider's website to see if they offer a free virus option...they did in my case.
 

Trebuin

macrumors 65816
Jun 3, 2008
1,494
272
Central Cali
I've tried virus barrier...horrible product. It does provide decent defs, but it was constantly crashing my computer and after so much time, it would randomly corrupt some critical files.
 

GGJstudios

macrumors Westmere
May 16, 2008
44,545
943
Macs do have destructive programs...I've run into a non-replicating virus
If it's non-replicating, it's not a virus.
wrapped in a legit program
That's a trojan, not a virus.
that does a great job wiping your hard drive.
No Mac OS X malware has that behavior. None will wipe the hard drive.
After this incident, I did a little research and found another that does an excellent job conducting a low level format of your hard drive to reduce the hard drive size to almost nothing in size.
Again, no Mac OS X malware has that behavior. What you're describing does not exist for Mac OS X.
So yes, there are viruses for osx
No, there aren't. Name one.
in the two cases I found, you enter your admin password to run
If you have to enter your admin password to run it, it's not a virus.
If the company is hacked...in my first case...then only AV can protect you.
Antivirus software doesn't protect against hacking. Antivirus can't protect you from a Mac OS X virus, since none exist. They can't protect against a future virus, since they don't know what to look for.
This is why the Mac Defender virus was such a problem.
MacDefender wasn't a virus. Read the Mac Virus/Malware Info link I posted earlier, to learn the differences between viruses, trojans and other forms of malware.
 

Big Bad D

macrumors 6502a
Jan 3, 2007
503
532
France
I don't have any links with Intego, but my experience is the total opposite of Trebuin's: VirusBarrier has worked almost perfectly on a range of Macs and once set up is invisible. Their customer support is very good (for an upgrade/renewal problem) - what did they say about the claimed file corruptions?
 

sjinsjca

macrumors 68020
Oct 30, 2008
2,238
555
Sophos has a good free anti-malware utility, but you really don't need it. I tried it and found it bogged my system a la Windows anti-malware utilities. And it's not needed. Not needed. Really. Not needed.

The only concern for OS X is idiocy by the user in downloading and willingly installing something dodgy, perhaps as the result of a webpage pop-up that scares them into installing something unfortunate, or perhaps because they greedily downloaded and installed hacked software from a wares site. OS X has a built-in scanner which mitigates many such threats, but NO system is any more secure than the wetware sitting at the keyboard.

Don't be stupid, and you'll be fine.

If you really want to do it right, create a non-Administrator account and use that for your everyday computing. It puts an extra layer of privilege in place. Unlike non-Admin user accounts on Windows, they're fully functional on the Mac and not at all annoying to live with.
 

GGJstudios

macrumors Westmere
May 16, 2008
44,545
943
Sophos has a good free anti-malware utility
Sophos is not recommended, as it can actually increase your Mac's vulnerability.
If you really want to do it right, create a non-Administrator account and use that for your everyday computing. It puts an extra layer of privilege in place. Unlike non-Admin user accounts on Windows, they're fully functional on the Mac and not at all annoying to live with.
It won't make any meaningful security difference whether you run as an admin or standard user.
 

munkery

macrumors 68020
Dec 18, 2006
2,217
1
Macs do have destructive programs...I've run into a non-replicating virus wrapped in a legit program that does a great job wiping your hard drive....

So yes, there are viruses for osx, but they are few and far between and in the two cases I found, you enter your admin password to run...just make sure you're running a legit program.

Was this a targeted and/or prank style attack?

I suspect that the malicious app was simply a front end to a shell script, such as "Sudo rm -rf /".

I believe this type of malicious app is fairly easy to make in Automator.

If the company is hacked...in my first case...then only AV can protect you.

If the AV software does not have a definition for the malware, the only protection is not running and password authenticating the untrusted app in the first place.

BTW, Mac OS X SL and Lion include by default a simple malware scanner to detect known trojans. But, this does not negate the need for users to implement safe computing practices.
 

gnasher729

Suspended
Nov 25, 2005
17,980
5,565
I don't have any links with Intego, but my experience is the total opposite of Trebuin's: VirusBarrier has worked almost perfectly on a range of Macs and once set up is invisible. Their customer support is very good (for an upgrade/renewal problem) - what did they say about the claimed file corruptions?

You can instead install nothing, which works at least as well, needs no support, costs nothing, and will cause you no problems.

To date, the amount of cost and damage caused by anti-virus and anti-malware software on the Mac has far outweighed any cost and damage caused by viruses and malware.

And the most important rule: If a website claims they have found viruses or malware on your computer (or if you get a phone call making that claim), they are lying. (Applies to Windows as well), and whatever they try to make you install on your computer to fix the problem is at best useless, but possibly harmful.
 

Big Bad D

macrumors 6502a
Jan 3, 2007
503
532
France
I agree that there is no current virus risk on Macs and am not saying that other Mac users should install anti-virus software. But as I end up distributing many documents between PC using customers, I don't want to be responsible for inadvertently forwarding a PC virus. They won't affect my Mac, but will affect my business. That's why I choose to use anti-virus software and for me Virus Barrier does the job, at a not too unreasonable price. But each to their own views and decision depending on their needs.
 

DoctorWho

Suspended
Jun 18, 2011
92
0
Hobart, Tasmania
I've never used antivirus software on any of the Macs I've owned, and I've never had a problem.

Seriously, as long as you don't visit any dodgy websites (you know the ones I mean ;)) and only install software from reputable websites, you should be fine.
 

416049

macrumors 68000
Mar 14, 2010
1,844
2
Simply stay on the Watch, don't download software illegally and in case of super paramonia use firefox with adblocker,noscript and you are fine
 

GGJstudios

macrumors Westmere
May 16, 2008
44,545
943
So that Clamx thing is better than Sophos?
Yes, ClamXav is a better choice than Sophos, since it doesn't increase your Mac's vulnerability by running with elevated privileges, as Sophos does. The link I posted in post #2 will give more details.
 

benhollberg

macrumors 68020
Mar 8, 2010
2,170
7
I have been using Sophos for a long time, since the Mac version went free that is. Sophos had a feature called On-access scanning which basically scanned your computer all the time. I turned that off because I didn't want to waste CPU and battery, I just scan about once a week now and do the entire hard drive.

So after people recommend ClamXav I downloaded it from their website. It has a similar feature called Sentry that scans files all the time, I think. Anyway I don't want it scan files all the time. What I want to do is just scan the entire hard drive about once a week. At all other times I would the application to be closed and not running using CPU and battery. So if someone could please help me out and explain to me, or clarify, that when nothing is in the Sentry list then ClamxAV is just simply not running.

Thanks.
 

GGJstudios

macrumors Westmere
May 16, 2008
44,545
943
So after people recommend ClamXav I downloaded it from their website. It has a similar feature called Sentry that scans files all the time, I think. Anyway I don't want it scan files all the time. What I want to do is just scan the entire hard drive about once a week. At all other times I would the application to be closed and not running using CPU and battery. So if someone could please help me out and explain to me, or clarify, that when nothing is in the Sentry list then ClamxAV is just simply not running.
Yes, that feature is off, by default. From: http://www.clamxav.com/docs_sentry.php
Before you can actually make use of this feature, you must specify which folders you wish ClamXav Sentry to watch. This is done by choosing the Add/Remove Folders option from the ClamXav Sentry menu.

Upon doing so, ClamXav will start up and open the preferences at the Folder Sentry panel. Please consult the ClamXav Preferences documentation for complete information on how to specify which folders to watch.

You can also verify that no ClamXav processes are running by launching Activity Monitor and change "My Processes" at the top to "All Processes".
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.