A 1600p display obviously. Starting at $1800 I think.
dude...they make great products..its not about the money...
A 1600p display obviously. Starting at $1800 I think.
And I would bet you can't use six GB of RAM.
Big mistake there.
If the CPU and GPU are the same as the 15" then I'd be sold...
Whilst Im happy with my 15" my return window expires on the 14-19th September... when is the conference again?
maybe but i think they always need to keep the 15 and 13 different in more ways then 2" screen, if they did they could really only make the 2 about $150 different in price
The thing is, my 2011 13" mbp already got pretty hot - without a dGPU.It could be the 640m LE (note: "LE") which is the one suggested for the hypothetical mac mini 2012. It makes sense both performance wise (it's about 30/35% slower than stock 650m) and power consumption (20w versus 45w stock 650m). I bet nothing less or they won't manage that resolution.
But Apple still managed to put inside 15'' rMBP an overclocked 650m, which probably consumes more than stock 45w. If they go for the Dual-Core route cpu side (instead of the Quad-Core like the current rMBP), they could still have something as powerful as a 650m in a 13.3'' form factor.
Keep in mind they are using this cpu: i7-3615qm - 45w tdp. There are 17w and 25w tdp dual core cpus (see Macbook Air 2012), so they can still manage to afford a 650m (at least I hope it).
My 0.02$.
I'm hopeful that they will otherwise it will be too similar to the MBA...
Nobody to blame but yourself. You've been around long enough to have known the rMBP13 was an eventuality.I'd be quite pissed if they did announce one so soon. Just got my 15" Retina last week and I really want a 13" I believe.
I do hd video editing and 16GB is easily in use. Also when editing multiple photos in photoshop.
Exactly. Why would Apple have 2 systems with essentially the same form factor, but slightly different componentry, at about the same price point? That makes no sense. There has to be more differentiation between the systems than just a relatively minor difference in screen quality.
Maybe they'd drop the price of the Air at the same time.
Wonder what the 13" rMBP weight will be compared to the 13" MacBook Air?
My point was, that if they have integrated graphics and a similar CPU then it is more or less the same device as a MBA with a nicer screen. I'd like to see a dedicated GPU and decent CPU to justify the higher price - then we have two different products albeit with the same form factor.
Any sort of reasonable discreet graphix, same thickness as the 15", under $2k and I'm sold.
You think that a dedicated GPU would mean anything to the general consumer?
I understand the technical reason for why having one is good, and I agree. But I wonder who Apple is targeting with this 13 inch system. Sure, the 15 inch rMBP was for early adopters and geeks and power users. But who would be the target audience for a 13 inch rMBP? I think it would be more for the general consumer rather than the types who got the 15 inch model. If that's true, then I don't see a clear distinction between it and the MBA.
I think that there is a large segment who want a machine that is more robust than the MBA in the travel friendly 13" size. A think that a 13" rMBP with a 16GB RAM BTO will appeal to biz users who use their machines differently than do students and everyday users. I don't see the 13" MBA and MBP merging as is often suggested. All 13" users do not have the same needs and wants. Hasn't the 13" MBP been Apple's best seller?
I think that there is a large segment who want a machine that is more robust than the MBA in the travel friendly 13" size. A think that a 13" rMBP with a 16GB RAM BTO will appeal to biz users who use their machines differently than do students and everyday users. I don't see the 13" MBA and MBP merging as is often suggested. All 13" users do not have the same needs and wants. Hasn't the 13" MBP been Apple's best seller?
Yes, and next year, all Non-Retina pros are going to be phased out.
Leaving... you guessed it.. 2 lines of Apple Laptops. The Airs (for general use), and the Pros (with Retina).
The 13" Air will take the place of the current 13" pro with stride.
I would buy a MBP 13'' with a dedicated gpu, even a non-retina one. I skipped this generation because 1) it is not really necessary for me (still going with Nehalem) 2) Haswell looks a lot more promising on integrated gpu side 3) I tried many form factors (from eeepc 7'' to alienware 18'') and i decided 13'' is for me.
I have to disagree with this part, the Air is a premium notebook, not as fast or expandable but premium none the less. With that in mind consider that Apple gave the Air a retina display, its just right. One of the worlds slimmest notebooks in form factor with a retina display. You know it's a smart move.
But who would be the target audience for a 13 inch rMBP? I think it would be more for the general consumer rather than the types who got the 15 inch model. If that's true, then I don't see a clear distinction between it and the MBA.
...and look which CPU option it gives (section: Performance and Horsepower)!! If Sony does it, why not Apple too??
Bye
Andrea