The butterfly keyboard was a failure. An embarrassing one, at that.If they could replace the touch bar with proper function keys then this would be a decent entry pro machine.
Now for my hot take, I still love the butterfly keyboard.
The butterfly keyboard was a failure. An embarrassing one, at that.If they could replace the touch bar with proper function keys then this would be a decent entry pro machine.
Now for my hot take, I still love the butterfly keyboard.
Maybe you are also involved in business development and face to face stuff with clients, but personally I just need to be able to pull and push stuff off the company repository and obviously write/review code, I've never had to plug my laptop into a customers projector!
The majority of standups, meetings, etc we do are now Zoom based, and from what I've seen when we do interact with customers it's also using Zoom and screen sharing.
I've used my MacBook with other people's projectors in a non-professional capacity and found that the HDMI dongle from Apple works just fine,
so not really sure how you can assert that a developer isn't professional because they can't directly plug their laptop into a projector when its hardly the definitive requirement of a 'professional developer' and there is a dongle for it anyway.
The biggest problem with the Touch Bar is that it increased the BOM (bill of materials) substantially without contributing enough value to be worth the additional $200 price.
I think that, if Apple had kept the physical function keys row, and added the TouchBar on top, the TouchBar could have had better adoption.
Anyways, I’m happy there’s still a MacBook for the TouchBar lovers.
'Okay stop'. A port on the side of the computer that serves a single function and most people will use very infrequently is an outdated concept.
I'd much rather have multiple thunderbolt ports that can deliver 40Gb/s and be used to drive a display or do any number of other things including being daisy chained and connecting multiple devices at the same time.
Why waste development money on the 13” Pro?
The reason the latest Macbooks "only" have three USB-C ports is that there is not enough bandwidth left for a 4th port. There is not a single laptop on the entire market that has four Thunderbolt 4 ports that can run at full speed simultaneously, and isn't also impaired by one of these ports being used for charging (whereas on the Macs the ports are actually free due to Magsafe).
Even with 4 port Intel Macbooks two ports share the bandwidth. The current Macbooks have a 50% higher combined throughput than the Intel ones before, the total is now 3x40Gbps instead of the previous 2x40Gbps.
I have a small bus-powered USB-C adapter that turns a single USB-C port into 4 ports, each limited to 10Gbps (USB 3.1 Gen2), I think it uses this chipset: https://www.via-labs.com/product_show.php?id=99
That gives me plenty additional ports for lower-bandwidth devices and still leaves two full speed ports free. If that isn't enough you can get yet another one of these adapters to turn 2 ports into 8 - still leaving you with two display outputs, and if you want you can get even more ports and yet another display output through a Thunderbolt dock.
The amount of I/O we have on the current Macbooks is honestly quite insane and on par with desktop workstations in similar price ranges. For example I found the expensive ASUS ProArt Z790 that offers a "massive" 2 Thunderbolt ports with no mention anywhere even in the full user manual that these aren't combined 40Gbps on a single controller. In fact, the website say "up to 40Gbps" so these two ports likely share the bandwidth.
There is a reason why the Mac Studio with the M1 Max has 2xTB and 2xUSB instead of 4xTB like the Ultra. The USB-C ports are there, but they are limited to 10Gbps on the M1 Max. Why? Not enough bandwidth.
Say the m3 goes into the 13”, Those chips could’ve gone into iMacs or Airs or other designs.How much development do you think is going into it?
It was a joke lol, but yes a massive failure indeedThe butterfly keyboard was a failure. An embarrassing one, at that.
Keep the Ivy legacy, I really dislike notch mac...
Exactly. I find the notch incredibly ugly yet I don't have to look at it: Set the menu bar to black and it's gone:The choice is yours - either you like the notch or you like thick bezels. It's one or the other with today's technology.
Surely you're taking the piss, no? 🤣Now for my hot take, I still love the butterfly keyboard.
Yep. If there's an OS whose manufacturer can get away with this notch thing, that's macOS and its 39-year-old (40-year-old, if you count the Macintosh XL, née Lisa) top menu bar. If any other PC maker attempted a notch like Apple's, everyone would be crying bloody murder.Exactly. I find the notch incredibly ugly yet I don't have to look at it: Set the menu bar to black and it's gone:
View attachment 2189762
This is actually what it looks like when using it, the notch is as black as the background and cannot be distinguished even when you try to look for it. The space is still unusable for menu bar items of course, but visually it isn't ugly anymore.
That space remains unused 100% for many users, and is only used some of the time in certain applications such as the Adobe ones. And these applications skip the unusable space and continue the menu bar items on the other side. For me personally that is acceptable, the alternative would be less usable space for applications 100% of the time. I rather have the bigger screen.If there's an OS whose manufacturer can get away
That space remains unused 100% for many users, and is only used some of the time in certain applications such as the Adobe ones. And these applications skip the unusable space and continue the menu bar items on the other side. For me personally that is acceptable, the alternative would be less usable space for applications 100% of the time. I rather have the bigger screen.