Yes, but up until now, those magnets weren't affiliated with the most powerful corporation on the planet $$$. (err... 2nd most powerful)
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
14-Year-Old Discovers iPad Smart Cover Magnets Can Shut Off Implanted Defibrillators
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
It was obviously sarcasm. Apparently jokes about Samsung don't go over very well around here.
I'm just waiting to see how Samsung is gonna copy this one from Apple...
Ya know they gotta one up them soooo, can't wait.
They wouldn't need to put the magnets inside the iPad if they didn't have the smart cover. Ditch the smart cover and they don't need the magnets. Problem solved.
That didnt know they had a pacemaker? LOL! It`s like saying diabetic people not knowing what they are eating.
err...for those that didn't know a very tiny magnet on the iPad can hurt them.
Maybe not so surprising when you consider that Apple has been heavily promoting the iPad to the medical profession. A lot of doctors in the US are using iPads now. Someone even commented that the iPad mini was just the right size to fit in the pocket of a doctors coat.
well, it's a common question that a lot of people ask whether or not iPad magnets could interfere with their pacemakers. it's not so much a 14-year-old *discovered*, it's more of a PSA by a 14 year old.
Patients know what their doctors tell them. My dad has a pacemaker and we didn't know that an iPad on the chest could be dangerous. I assumed they would be tiny little magnets with no real strength.
I'd wait before forming an opinion until the report is verified by actual specialists and technicians who work with the device. The report only quotes the student with regard to the magnet/pacemaker interaction. There aren't any details on exactly how the study done, how many subjects, etc.).
Of course, as others have pointed out, this is an Apple product, so jumping to conclusions seems to be a given these days (and ignoring every other source of magnetic fields, including 3rd party accessories).
I have an implanted device myself which can be turned off and on transdermally with a magnet (though not a pacemaker, it would be a similar depth below the skin). So far, the only magnet that I can get to work with it is the stout horseshoe magnet that was given to me by the implant manufacturer. And, even then, it needs to be moving past the device through a very narrow path close to the skin. It needs to work through many millimeters of tissue, which limits how far away it can be in x, y, and z axis.
For grins, I just tried the Smart Cover, and unsurprisingly, it has no effect.
All that being said, there are many types of implants from many manufacturers, and I'm sure they have some variance in sensitivity to a controlling magnetic field. On the other hand, they can't change physics: field intensity decreases exponentially with distance. Also, there are only very limited types of detectors (they probably use Hall Effect), so the devices will all have similar specs for external control magnetic fields.
Of course, as others have pointed out, this is an Apple product, so jumping to conclusions seems to be a given these days (and ignoring every other source of magnetic fields, including 3rd party accessories).
I have an implanted device myself which can be turned off and on transdermally with a magnet (though not a pacemaker, it would be a similar depth below the skin). So far, the only magnet that I can get to work with it is the stout horseshoe magnet that was given to me by the implant manufacturer. And, even then, it needs to be moving past the device through a very narrow path close to the skin. It needs to work through many millimeters of tissue, which limits how far away it can be in x, y, and z axis.
For grins, I just tried the Smart Cover, and unsurprisingly, it has no effect.
All that being said, there are many types of implants from many manufacturers, and I'm sure they have some variance in sensitivity to a controlling magnetic field. On the other hand, they can't change physics: field intensity decreases exponentially with distance. Also, there are only very limited types of detectors (they probably use Hall Effect), so the devices will all have similar specs for external control magnetic fields.
I love how the sausage fest that makes up this site's audience can't fathom that A GIRL did this science project, even though it plainly says it in the article. It's the 21st century, many women are in science, get with the program.
BTW- many women were in science before but didn't get much credit for what they did because they aren't attention whores like men are. Ironic, huh? Men....are the whores...
Maybe the defibrillator manufactures should be blamed for letting magnets affect there device. This is really sad that apple is getting blasted for this.
Headline: New Study Shows Apple iPad Can Cause Brain Damage!
Abstract: Hitting yourself in the head with an iPad forcefully and repeatedly could possibly cause brain damage. (The same can be said of a rock, but I didn't have a rock handy for the study. And besides, everyone knows that hitting yourself in the head with a rock could cause brain damage so that doesn't make a good headline.) I will be presenting these stunning findings to a group of 8000 doctors who are attending the conference mainly as a vacation/boondoggle.
Not really valuable, as it's not only been known for literally decades but it's part of the design of the device to begin with. Any strong magnet can reset or temporary stop AICDs and they all reset pacemakers. A strong refrigerator magnet will do the same thing. When the pacemaker rep comes to "interrogate" your AICD or pacemaker he brings along a task-specific computer and a large friggin magnet.
Valuable information perhaps in general, but information that didn't need to be "found" as it was already readily available (people just didn't care enough to actually read it it would seem).