Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
15" MBP: Hi-Res v. Normal Res
- Thread starter jzj687
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Well it's been years and i Doesn't bother me
I heard people using a mac with a window right behind them or a light pointed directly to the screen, no surprise to hear people complaining...
Regular Res for me since I read a lot with my machine. And it provides slightly better frame rates when gaming in comparison to gaming with the hi-res on the same gpu.
If the rumors are right, the standard res that we have right now might be a thing of the past with future MBPs.
If the rumors are right, the standard res that we have right now might be a thing of the past with future MBPs.
I re-ripped all of my Blu-rays into 1080p just because I opted for the hi-res.
It makes a HUGE difference.
Also, reflections on the glossy are minimal. YMMV. It depends on the person, but I personally like the black bezel. And if you turn the display to full brightness, you will never see a reflection, ever.
It makes a HUGE difference.
Also, reflections on the glossy are minimal. YMMV. It depends on the person, but I personally like the black bezel. And if you turn the display to full brightness, you will never see a reflection, ever.
I have the HR 15" and I like it a lot. I've never used a 1440x900 native display, so I can't directly compare the two, but I've used a 1680x1050 display at work for years now and really favor that particular resolution. I think the decision largely depends on what you're used to. If you're coming from 1680x1050, 1920x1200, or 1920x1080, then you'll probably feel more at ease with the HR. If you're coming from 1024x768, 1280x1024, or the dreaded 1366x768, then the 1440x900 is probably fine.
If you're planning on watching 1080p video, then I agree with the rest of the gang that the HR makes a big difference.
If you're planning on watching 1080p video, then I agree with the rest of the gang that the HR makes a big difference.
That might be true, but those rumors have been swirling around like that for the past few iterations of the MBP. Maybe at some point they'll be right but maybe they'll never be right.If the rumors are right, the standard res that we have right now might be a thing of the past with future MBPs.
I was against the Hi-Res as the only option for 15" display but as I need more screen real estate my opinion has been changing.
Last edited:
Just an FYI... the High Resolution option for a 15" is 1680x1050. Which means that you can NOT watch 1080p video.
Apparently alot of misinformed people on here.
The only way you could get 1080p on a 15" is to hook up an external monitor and have AT LEAST 1920x1080 to get 1080p.
Nonetheless, you can watch 720p on either resolution as 720p resolution is 1280x720.
So in summary... if you are wanting to watch high definition video, then it doesn't matter what display option you buy, as they will both support 720p.
Apparently alot of misinformed people on here.
The only way you could get 1080p on a 15" is to hook up an external monitor and have AT LEAST 1920x1080 to get 1080p.
Nonetheless, you can watch 720p on either resolution as 720p resolution is 1280x720.
So in summary... if you are wanting to watch high definition video, then it doesn't matter what display option you buy, as they will both support 720p.
You can watch 1080p video on a 1680 x 1050. It will just be scaled a little bit - not something you would notice. Most people won't notice the difference between 720p and 1080p on a screen smaller than 46" anyway.
True... but isn't that the same as saying... you can watch movies with color on a black and white television, but it will just be scaled a little bit?
Either it's 1080p, or it's not.
The difference between 1080p vs. 720p is a GREATER difference than 720p vs. 480p. (360 lines vs. 240 lines)
The point being... no matter which resolution display you buy, 1080p will be scaled down to 720p.
Personally... I notice a difference when setting my Xbox at 720p vs. 1080p on my 24" Dell monitor.
No, that's a little silly.
No, it will be scaled to the native display resolution, i.e., 1680x1050, but scaled to account for the aspect ratio of the content ... 1080p content scales to 720p on 1280x720 display devices. Generally scaling things down is less problematic vs. scaling up (i.e., sampling down data vs. scaling it up).
Plus as someone pointed out, we're talking about small displays which aren't going to be notable, heck, 720p vs. 1080p content on smaller-ish TVs, sitting at normal viewing distances makes very little difference.
No, technically, 1080p would be scaled down to the nearest resolution. We're talking about computers, not gaming consoles.
So scaling 1080p to 1680 x 1050, you're losing approximately 310,000 pixels worth of details.
On 1440 x 900, you're losing 780,000 pixels worth of details. Or more than twice the details.
It sounds like a lot, but depending on the scene and the camera being used to shoot that scene (as well as lens and other factors) the details lost might be just excess noise, and as such, not very noticeable.
It'll be noticeable on gaming or pixel-perfect contents because those don't have noise to account for. But movies are shot with cameras, and cameras produce noise, so for movies, scaling down 1080p is acceptable in some cases.
In fact, a 1080p movie clip scaled down to 720p would still look better than a movie shot at 720p due to the same noise problem.
On your XBox, depending on the game, some games run at resolutions higher than 720p by default. I think there's an article at Beyond3D that explains this, but technically, if it's higher than 720p natively, and it doesn't have noise to account for, then displaying it at either its native resolution or higher would undoubtedly make it look better. That's not necessarily the case with movies.
That's why sometimes you see photographers scale their photos down to, say... 2048 x 1536 even though the original is something like 4000 x 3000.
So if the only photo editing software you use if photoshop, along with just doing normal things, ie, writing, watching videos and internet the high res isn't really needed?
I do a lot of writing and am looking at a lot of text on websites - is the text really that tiny?
I do a lot of writing and am looking at a lot of text on websites - is the text really that tiny?
So does that mean that if I'm watching 1080p video on a thunderbolt display, it will upscale it to 1440p?
What if I am editing a 1080p digital video on my 1440x900 and save it... will it suddenly save it to 900p?
Or... what if I'm watching a 720p video on my 1680x1050 display and make it into a very small window, am I now watching it in 300x200?
My point is... you need at least 1920x1080 resolution to display 1080p content. Anything less is.... well... less than 1080p.
I own a 27" iMac, 1080P HDTVs, etc... I still watch stuff that is 720p or worse (online streaming).... never made a difference. Watched a few Blu-rays on my PS3, went back to DVDs because they made absolutely no difference in enjoying the movie.
The only time when resolution actually matters to me is window space, and seeing pixels (text)