Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

15" Portibility

G

Gman021

macrumors regular
Original poster
Aug 21, 2012
143
0
Just want to here from the 15" rMBP users who do a lot of traveling/carrying with their computer. Possibly compared to a 13" if you ever had one.

Never thought I would go for the 15" due to it's size, but Iris Pro, Quad Core, and the slim size are making me reconsider.



Would also appreciate if someone had a picture of a cMBP 13" on top of a 15" retina.
 
Gman021 said:
Just want to here from the 15" rMBP users who do a lot of traveling/carrying with their computer. Possibly compared to a 13" if you ever had one.

Never thought I would go for the 15" due to it's size, but Iris Pro, Quad Core, and the slim size are making me reconsider.



Would also appreciate if someone had a picture of a cMBP 13" on top of a 15" retina.
Click to expand...

I can tell you the 15" rMBP is way more portable than the 15" cMBP (I've both). The 500g difference really makes up a lot.

But I still carry my cMBP when I'm working on photoshoots outdoors because it's got an antiglare screen (the retina's IPS screen is also super, but it attracts glare like a solar flare in daylight).
 
I have both, the 13" cMBP and a 15" rMBP. The 15" rMBP is fine in terms of portability, and the increased screen real estate is a huge plus. I'm actually in a resort now using it and find it to be great.

Since I'm not at home, I cannot snap a picture of both as requested, but you can compare them at your local apple store.
 
I went from a 13" MBA to a 15" rMBP and I travel a lot
While it is obviously heavier, I don't really notice that much at all
And the extra screen real estate is well worth it for me
 
Gman021 said:
Just want to here from the 15" rMBP users who do a lot of traveling/carrying with their computer. Possibly compared to a 13" if you ever had one.

Never thought I would go for the 15" due to it's size, but Iris Pro, Quad Core, and the slim size are making me reconsider.



Would also appreciate if someone had a picture of a cMBP 13" on top of a 15" retina.
Click to expand...

I have the cMBP and a case logic backpack (https://www.caselogic.com/en-us/us/products/laptop-cases/laptop-backpacks/156-laptop-tablet-backpack-_-bebp_-_115_-_black) and when my backpack is empty aside from the laptop I can barely notice it at all. As the rMBP is even lighter I reckon it won't be a problem to take it with you.

The 15", however, isn't really the best lap laptop in my opinion. I'd much rather just take my gf's 13" Macbook air if I go sit on the couch or something. I mostly use my 15" on a desk (but, as I said, it's a cMBP so the rMBP will probably be more comfortable to use on your lap).
 
I had a 13" cMBP for a semester in college, no trouble carrying that around. I was hesitant getting the 15" rMPB because of the slightly larger footprint, wondering if if it would be to heavy to carry around or to fit on my desk or lap. Went through with it because I needed the power of the 15". Honestly, its not really any different from the 13". Its thin which makes it much easier to carry around than the cMBP, and there is no noticeable difference on a desk or lap. In turn, I think the 15" MBP is quite portable! Especially when compared to the bulky 17" Asus gaming laptop I used to carry around. Even so, I much rather the form factor of the 13" rMBP, I just wish they had quad cores and higher end graphics.
 
I bought my first 13 inch MBP back in 2010 when started my Law degree (night program) since wasn't sure a 15 inch would be appropiate for the small desks at school. I later upgraded to the 15 inch retina series due to its smallest footprint (versus the old 15 inch MBP) and its awesome retina display. The 15 inch can be carry around, but you will need a big bag or backpack to make it fit. By july 2013 I bought an used 13 inch rMBP to compare it to mine and decided the smallest size was a better choice for me. (Sold the 15 inch rMBP; later upgraded it to the current 13 inch Haswell rMBP model).

Here is my former 2012 15 inch rMBP (2.7/16/768 with Samsung display) and my former 2012 13 inch rMBP (2.9/8/768) side by side:

IMG_2269.JPG



The following pictures I got them on the web. This one shows the 13 inch rMBP on top of the 15 inch rMBP:

13%2520inch%2520versus%252015%2520inch%2520rMBP.jpg


This one shows the comparisson of the 13 inch MacBook Pro versus the 13 inch rMBP (2012 model):

another%2520one.png


I still have home my old 13 inch MBP (now belongs to my son), so if you need more pictures comparing the old 13 inch MBP to the newest Haswell 13 inch rMBP let me know. :rolleyes:

It is true the 15" rMBP is smaller (than the old 15 inch MBP) and about as heavy as the 13 inch MBP, but the 13 inch rMBP is by far more portable than the 15 inch rMBP. If you need the extra screen real estate or the additional raw power of the 15 model with its quad processor and dedicated GPU (in all Ivy Bridge 2012 and early 2013 models, in some late 2013 Haswell models), go for the 15 inch rMBP; if you want better portability go for the 13" rMBP.
 
Last edited:
The 13" is a pretty fast computer and it's screen is beautiful, but the 15" is noticably more so, especially in regard to speed and overall agility. So after using the 15", the 13" feels like a 2 year old model; i.e. you have to put up with slight pauses for it to get things done as they are not performed nearly instantly as they are on the 15".

There is a moderate price to pay for the 15", however, in terms of overall weight and portability. So every potential owner will have to weigh the tradeoffs.
 
I used to have a 13" macbook, then switched to 15" when bought a pro. The only time I wish it were smaller is when I'm on an airplane.
 
I lug mine around for 12 hours a day in a backpack. I wouldn't ever consider going down to a 13"

If you are concerned about portability, just make sure you choose an appropriate bag to carry it in...the computer itself is extremely portable.
 
Dovahkiing said:
I used to have a 13" macbook, then switched to 15" when bought a pro. The only time I wish it were smaller is when I'm on an airplane.
Click to expand...

This is certainly something to consider if you fly a lot, I find my 13 cMBP just barely usable on the tray tables in coach...
 
Gman021 said:
Just want to here from the 15" rMBP users who do a lot of traveling/carrying with their computer. Possibly compared to a 13" if you ever had one.

Never thought I would go for the 15" due to it's size, but Iris Pro, Quad Core, and the slim size are making me reconsider.



Would also appreciate if someone had a picture of a cMBP 13" on top of a 15" retina.
Click to expand...

I wanted to buy the 13" rMBP as well, after which I got the chance to buy the base 15" model for around the same price as the 13" model I had my eye on.

Quad Core and Iris Pro did it for me as well, which is a significant difference in power from the 13" rMBP. While it's larger in size, you do get a larger display. I think the difference in screen size is "+10" points for the 15" rMBP, while the difference in portability is only "-5" points. It's really nice to have the big screen to work/play on, while the larger size isn't that bad.

My previous main laptop was a 13" Dell XPS ultrabook, which is more like the MBA. At first I thought the 15" rMBP is quite larger, so I didn't move it as much as my Dell. After 2 weeks that changed though. Now I see the 15" rMBP as light and slim. So I guess it's a matter of getting used to. And when I work on 13" screens, I can't believe I used such a small screen for so long :p
 
id say the same as people are saying above, both computers are very portable, not all backpacks can hold a 15" so id make sure you have that otherwise go for it.

I went from a 17" pc to a 13" mac and thought id miss the screen real estate but the 13 does fine for me.
 
kathyricks said:
The 13" is a pretty fast computer and it's screen is beautiful, but the 15" is noticably more so, especially in regard to speed and overall agility. So after using the 15", the 13" feels like a 2 year old model; i.e. you have to put up with slight pauses for it to get things done as they are not performed nearly instantly as they are on the 15".

There is a moderate price to pay for the 15", however, in terms of overall weight and portability. So every potential owner will have to weigh the tradeoffs.
Click to expand...

So you got that from playing around at a shop?

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/713578/

We have both early 2013 models and for general use they seem just as quick to me. Maybe the new ones are different.

If hade to carry one around all day i would go the 13", if it was mainly at home and the occasion travel trip 15".
 
simonsi said:
11" MBA is my weapon of choice when flying or traveling ultra-light....
Click to expand...

Yea the 11" MBA is the best for that purpose and the only real difference.
Between 13" and 15" MBP not so much but the 11" MBA is the best just for traveling and not need that extra cpu power
 
I travel with my 15in 2011 MBP all the time for work.
It's not a problem to carry around, my Crumpler bag has a very comfy strap
and it's just not an issue.

On flights however, unless you have business seat or get lucky with space
it's often impossible to open and use on the tray ... and if someone puts their
seat back ..... !!!!:eek:

iPad is the item of choice on planes :D

M.
 
Marty62 said:
I travel with my 15in 2011 MBP all the time for work.
It's not a problem to carry around, my Crumpler bag has a very comfy strap
and it's just not an issue.

On flights however, unless you have business seat or get lucky with space
it's often impossible to open and use on the tray ... and if someone puts their
seat back ..... !!!!:eek:

iPad is the item of choice on planes :D

M.
Click to expand...

My 2011 15" MBP barely fits into a business-class table.

Once it's on the table, it's impossible to do anything else (besides using the MBP).

Fortunately the seat next to me was empty, so I moved my MBP to the table there and used my own table for handwritten work.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3120.JPG
    IMG_3120.JPG
    2.4 MB · Views: 97
I just purchased a 13" pro on Sunday. I really REALLY wanted the 15", but really couldn't justify the price difference seeing as how I started my search for a rMBP specifically for travel and not as my primary machine. I have a 27" iMac at home and another machine or two where I do my heavy lifting.

I have been able to run a VM, nothing seems slow or has hesitation and I get around the lack of screen real estate by hooking up my 24" monitor to it.

The biggest deciding factor though was a co-worker of mine telling me the 15" was not very usable on a plane. I get the chance to test the new 13" this afternoon on a flight so I will be able to speak from experience later on tonight if you are interested.

Thanks
 
MrDavros2U said:
I just purchased a 13" pro on Sunday. I really REALLY wanted the 15", but really couldn't justify the price difference seeing as how I started my search for a rMBP specifically for travel and not as my primary machine. I have a 27" iMac at home and another machine or two where I do my heavy lifting.

I have been able to run a VM, nothing seems slow or has hesitation and I get around the lack of screen real estate by hooking up my 24" monitor to it.

The biggest deciding factor though was a co-worker of mine telling me the 15" was not very usable on a plane. I get the chance to test the new 13" this afternoon on a flight so I will be able to speak from experience later on tonight if you are interested.

Thanks
Click to expand...

Having only 4GB of RAM on my 13" rMBP (won it in a raffle, so upgrading RAM wasn't an option), I couldn't run a VM at all. But yes, I concur that it's very portable and light for travel (it's barely 200g heavier than a 13" MBA).
 
I went from a mid 2012 12" MBA to a mid 2012 15“ rMBP and do miss the MBA weight difference but you get use to the 15“ quickly and performance beats it out of the water so everything evens out in the end. Before getting back into Macs, i was lugging around a 6lbs 15" Sager.
 
I was able to stop by the Apple store and take a picture of the 13" classic MBP stacked on the 15" rMBP. Couldn't find this picture anywhere on the internet.

photo2_zps560d085c.jpg


photo1_zpse39328f9.jpg


I handled one for about 5 minutes. May take a little getting used to the bigger screen and slightly bigger size, but it's worth it.
 
Last edited:
kathyricks said:
The 13" is a pretty fast computer and it's screen is beautiful, but the 15" is noticably more so, especially in regard to speed and overall agility. So after using the 15", the 13" feels like a 2 year old model; i.e. you have to put up with slight pauses for it to get things done as they are not performed nearly instantly as they are on the 15".

There is a moderate price to pay for the 15", however, in terms of overall weight and portability. So every potential owner will have to weigh the tradeoffs.
Click to expand...

Absolutely not true. For mainstream usage and single threaded applications, there will be virtually no appreciable difference. Of course if you are running more intensive programs that utilize the superior quad-core processors then the difference will be much greater. But to imply that the 13" feels dated is simply not true at all, especially since both machines share the same PCI SSD.

In regards to the original question here are my thoughts. I think there are two ways to think of portability as it relates to current notebooks. Footprint and weight. I originally had a 15" Haswell rMBP and later opted for the 13" model so I'm familiar with both.

The weight for both is negligible and for all the talk about the Air being so light, unless you have a physical limitation of some sort, both rMBP models are fine to carry around daily. The footprint (overall size) of the 13" is where it shines. While the 15" is much thinner than its cMBP predecessors, it still has the length of a bigger machine. The 13" has a more compact overall size than even the Air and there is very little wasted space (i.e. the keyboard on an island of the 15"). The 13" will easily fit in almost any type of pack and it is very comfortable to simply carry around with one arm as well.

I think the minimal footprint of the 13" rMBP is actually its greatest asset and I actually prefer the additional 1/2lb of weight than the Air because the block shape (especially the thicker screen) feels much more durable and solidly built to me. The 15" is an incredible piece of machinery with its additional screen size (which seems much bigger in real usage from the 13" than just 2.1") along with all that additional power under the hood. But assuming Iris has enough juice to meet your needs, I think the 13" is the much better buy for this generation if portability is one of your primary factors.
 
Orr said:
Absolutely not true. For mainstream usage and single threaded applications, there will be virtually no appreciable difference. Of course if you are running more intensive programs that utilize the superior quad-core processors then the difference will be much greater. But to imply that the 13" feels dated is simply not true at all, especially since both machines share the same PCI SSD.

In regards to the original question here are my thoughts. I think there are two ways to think of portability as it relates to current notebooks. Footprint and weight. I originally had a 15" Haswell rMBP and later opted for the 13" model so I'm familiar with both.

The weight for both is negligible and for all the talk about the Air being so light, unless you have a physical limitation of some sort, both rMBP models are fine to carry around daily. The footprint (overall size) of the 13" is where it shines. While the 15" is much thinner than its cMBP predecessors, it still has the length of a bigger machine. The 13" has a more compact overall size than even the Air and there is very little wasted space (i.e. the keyboard on an island of the 15"). The 13" will easily fit in almost any type of pack and it is very comfortable to simply carry around with one arm as well.

I think the minimal footprint of the 13" rMBP is actually its greatest asset and I actually prefer the additional 1/2lb of weight than the Air because the block shape (especially the thicker screen) feels much more durable and solidly built to me. The 15" is an incredible piece of machinery with its additional screen size (which seems much bigger in real usage from the 13" than just 2.1") along with all that additional power under the hood. But assuming Iris has enough juice to meet your needs, I think the 13" is the much better buy for this generation if portability is one of your primary factors.
Click to expand...

I fully agree with you, guess there are many like us that had the 15" rMBP but opted for the 13" rMBP due to its good specs and superior portability. I have no regrets with my switch and unless they do a 15" with a smaller footprint (the wide bezel could be made smaller eventually) the 13 inch size rMBP is a keeper. ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back