To understand the context: there are following tests presented
1. '16 with dGPU allowed but not forced so when there is something resource intensive it's being calculated on dGPU in short time and less energy spent overall,
2. '15 with dGPU forcibly disabled using GFXCardStatus so when there is something resource intensive instead of calculating it on dGPU in short time and spending less energy overall it's calculated on iGPU in more time with more energy spent overall even though this '15 can do the same '16 does in point 1,
3. '16 with dGPU forcibly enabled using Apple system settings so it always spends more energy.
So 1 is much beneficial compared to 2 and no surprise it shows better results. 2 is beneficial to 3 and no surprise it shows better results.
Overall? This review cannot be used to support
@Sanpete's claim since it does not compare apples to apples. It only shows that the battery runtime is enough which I,
@JustinRP37 and
@profmatt showed earlier.
[doublepost=1492899346][/doublepost]Yes, this is what I and
@JustinRP37 have been stating for the last pages. No,
@Sanpete is misleading people by providing bogus sources and not explaining the misleading in them. I just laugh his claims off without misleading anyone. I show screenshots for laughs (have a look - I don't claim anything on the battery runtime of 15" '16 when I provide screenshots - my claims are in different posts) and instead for several pages in a row state that battery runtime is the same as of '15. I did. I even made
@Sanpete to provide the sources. Had you not failed me (a joke

) I've made him make proper analysis as well, we were quite nearing it.