Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
However, I just bought my MBP, and in 2015, when 16GB RAM is common and runs $90, this upgrade path will give my MBP a spritz of that new-car-smell stuff for the following year or two.

Nice to know it's a bit more future-proof than I thought. Would it have killed them to connect the ODD to a SATA III port?!?

Absolutely! I usually keep my MBPs about 5-6 years. I've got 8GB RAM right now. In 3-4 years, I'll up it to 16GB RAM and maybe swap my hard drive for an SSD drive. By then, those prices should be considerably lower, as well. Between the two upgrades, that should give my machine a nice little boost in speed to last me another couple years.
 
16GB benchmarks from OWC

If you have $1,600 to spend on more ram then for the same amount you can update the base hard drive to a OWC 500GB SSD drive for $100 less and use that $100 to upgrade to 8GB. I think that combo would be more useful for the same price.

I agree, and to add to this comment a little bit further, just FYI, OWC has posted some elaborate benchmark tests of the newest MBP's 16GB RAM configurations on their website worth taking a look at:

PATmemorySSDMBP15.png


1) 13" 16GB benchmarks (SSD vs. HDD)
2) 15" 16GB benchmarks (SSD vs. HDD)
3) 17" 16GB benchmarks (SSD vs. HDD)


Snapshot of the Photoshop "Medium Action test" benchmark stats via OWC:
Code:
			[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]4GB[/COLOR]	[COLOR="DarkOrchid"]8GB[/COLOR]	[COLOR="DarkOrange"]16GB[/COLOR]

13" MBP 2.7GHZ HDD	[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]943.49[/COLOR]	[COLOR="DarkOrchid"]670.20[/COLOR]	[COLOR="DarkOrange"]438.05[/COLOR]
[b]13" MBP 2.7GHZ SSD	[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]408.05[/COLOR]	[COLOR="DarkOrchid"]323.45[/COLOR]	[COLOR="DarkOrange"]268.82[/COLOR][/b]

15" MBP 2.3GHZ HDD	[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]714.25[/COLOR]	[COLOR="DarkOrchid"]538.28[/COLOR]	[COLOR="DarkOrange"]410.72[/COLOR]
[b]15" MBP 2.3GHZ SSD	[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]354.27[/COLOR]	[COLOR="DarkOrchid"]266.44[/COLOR]	[COLOR="DarkOrange"]227.32[/COLOR][/b]

17" MBP 2.3GHZ HDD	[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]731.27[/COLOR]	[COLOR="DarkOrchid"]524.44[/COLOR]	[COLOR="DarkOrange"]427.21[/COLOR]
[b]17" MBP 2.3GHZ SSD	[COLOR="RoyalBlue"]352.39[/COLOR]	[COLOR="DarkOrchid"]266.85[/COLOR]	[COLOR="DarkOrange"]226.19[/COLOR][/b]


So based on the info highlighted above (taken at face value), basically, for the current prices of the 16GB RAM ($1,600) one would be better off for now for the same price just buying a SSD + 8GB of RAM instead and you'll generally notice about a 65% increase in overall system speed/performance (compared against the stock model with a HDD + 4GB of RAM) which is still 50% faster than an alternative stock model MBP system with the memory maxed out at 16GB RAM alone. But if you have an extra $2,700 to burn on top of your base MBP purchase ($1,600 for 16GB ram + $1,100 for SSD of 512GB) then that's a different story. :cool:

With all that said, it's still nice to know the new MBP's can be maxed out to 16GB of RAM; a definite must once the prices come down a bit. :)
 
Last edited:
Well thats nice to know. Unfortunately my (late 2007) MBP only takes up to 2 GB's of RAM which is how much I have. Possibly 4? from what I've heard.

late mbp 2007 can handle 2x2gb of ram, total 4 gb.
early 2007 can handle 3 gb max, even though it will also display the 4 gb on the system info screen ...
 
Wow, the 4GB DIMMs are $15 / GB and the 8GB DIMMs are $100 / GB. You'd have to be crazy to make this purchase at this point, but it's nice to see that the machine supports it.
 
But if you have an extra $2,700 to burn on top of your base MBP purchase ($1,600 for 16GB ram + $1,100 for SSD of 512GB) then that's a different story. :cool:

With all that said, it's still nice to know the new MBP's can be maxed out to 16GB of RAM; a definite must once the prices come down a bit. :)

And a definite must have when the SSD prices come down, too.
 
late mbp 2007 can handle 2x2gb of ram, total 4 gb.
early 2007 can handle 3 gb max, even though it will also display the 4 gb on the system info screen ...

No, the 2007 mbp allowed 6Mb. I had 6 in mine. This was very nice for running basic stuff in cs5 as the latest cs version finally allowed more ram to be used
 
Some owners do more with their MBPs than e-mail, surf the web and watch videos. Right now the price is what it is.

I totally agree. It just depends what one is doing with her/his machine. I'm frequently pushing all of my RAM with one job, e.g. for a large scientific computation (say, with Maple), and I often could use more RAM than that. I'm thinking of getting a larger MacPro with a lot more RAM now.... The price of RAM is always getting cheaper and cheaper..... certainly much less expensive than when I bought my octo-core MacPro in mid-2007.

For most users, 16 GB is just overkill or bragging rights... totally unneeded.
 
Some owners do more with their MBPs than e-mail, surf the web and watch videos. Right now the price is what it is.

As one of these users I completely agree. Yet spending 1600 on a ram upgrade is ridiculous if you really need that much speed and are willing to pay that much for it, you really are just better off with a less mobile and more powerful machine (mac pro).
 
Good news for Jswoosh

Well thats nice to know. Unfortunately my (late 2007) MBP only takes up to 2 GB's of RAM which is how much I have. Possibly 4? from what I've heard.

Apple actually offered up to 4 GB RAM in the late 2007 MBP as a build to order option. But it can actually handle up to 6 GB (one 2 GB module and one 4 GB module). You can find this upgrade available as a kit from Crucial. I upgraded my late 2007 to 6 GB two years ago and have had no problems. You should be able to upgrade to 4 GB or 6 GB fairly inexpensively, if you like.
 
What would anyone use that much ram for? You'll go blind doing video editing on a mb.
 
16GB RAM, uber... Now for the 30% of people who think they need compared to the 1% who will actually use it is now catered for
 
Alright nice I may do that if they don't come out with the new iMac's soon. Also did you install it yourself or have someone else do it?

I put it in myself. Very easy. Apple officially supports users doing it themselves and there is a guide on the Apple website. Take out the battery, undo a couple of screws in the battery compartment, take out the old RAM, put in the new one.

The main thing is to seat the new RAM properly - it needs a fair bit of force to push it in. If you don't have dents in your fingers afterwards, you aren't pushing it in hard enough :)


If you've ever opened up a PC, you can do it.
 
What would anyone use that much ram for? You'll go blind doing video editing on a mb.

Film composers utilizing huge orchestral sample libraries. When you stream samples, the first part of the sample is loaded into ram, the rest is streamed....(ssd for streaming)

Comprehensive libraries such as "Hollywood Strings" load between 12 to 20 gig of their sounds into RAM.

It's the only way to simulate the realism of a real orchestra.

Point is, being able to compose in Logic Pro with Hollywood strings on a MBP is a reality now... And very useful.

SvK
 
Last edited:
In a while these prices will cool off. Man, could you imagine a 2.3 quad with a 500gb SSD with 16gb ram?

1. you would be broke
2. you would be crazy unless you made money with the machine
3. it would be so cool!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.