Are you suggesting that she only started "using" the toilet at age 33? 😱Two years seems completely unbelievable. Couldn't this just be a perfect example of poor journalism? Meaning, that she had been "using" the toilet for two years, and all of sudden got stuck on it this time? That would make much more sense than "sitting on" the toilet for two years and shows that the correct word is everything sometimes.
In some ways this could be really convenient. Just ker-plunk when you feel like it, no worries.
Two years seems completely unbelievable. Couldn't this just be a perfect example of poor journalism? Meaning, that she had been "using" the toilet for two years, and all of sudden got stuck on it this time? That would make much more sense than "sitting on" the toilet for two years and shows that the correct word is everything sometimes.
Are you suggesting that she only started "using" the toilet at age 33? 😱
And, yes, I am saying that the journalist either used a poor choice of words, misquoted the office, the editor missed a missing word, or the officer spoke vaguely by using the word "sitting" because only idiots would believe such a preposterous scenario of a woman sitting on the same toilet seat for two years straight with no break. Any of those things are more likely than what the article points to.
She's going to have severe back pain when she gets older from sitting (probably crouching) on a toilet seat for two years.
who would do that???
I think the question should be: "Who would allow that?" 😕
I wonder if she kept up with the news. "What! Macs have moved to Intel?"
Two years...I smell poor reporting bs
Well I would go get my broom, but maybe a plunger would be better in this case. ... 2 years 😱 I think both (boyfriend & girlfriend) should be checked out for mental health issues. I mean how long would you let somebody sit on a toilet?I'm calling shennanigans on this one..