I don't want to sound harsh, but I have to agree, for the following reason. I've only seen a couple West Brom matches this season, but I don't understand why people say they play "attractive football".
True, they try to play a possession game, keep it on the ground and ping the ball around. But they aren't quick enough or precise enough to play that game in the premiership. Their defense can't handle premier league attacks. So, while they
try to play attractive football, they don't have the tools to make it work against most of the teams in the league.
Stoke and Hull City have, at times, played a much more effective if not as ambitious type of game. I think pragmatism is the order of the day for a promoted team's first season. If WBA stay up it will be through luck as much as anything (but you could probably say the same about the bottom five right now) - but if it does happen it will be interesting to see how their strategy changes next season (and the same can be said for Stoke and Hull City). Will they get back to basics, or keep trying the "attractive" thing going?
In MLS news, defending champs Columbus finally have their first win, 3-2 over Kansas City, after an 0-2-5 start to the season (the worst ever for a defending MLS champ

). It's about bloody time is all I'll say...we are scoring goals at a similar clip to last year, but a few key injuries tore a big hole in our defense, and it cost us.