How did they cheat?
They were given a penalty and they complied. That's a funny way to cheat...
Just because they were given a penalty, doesn't negate the fact that he/they cheated in the first place.
It was clearly apparent that he over took a Safety Car, under waved yellows, yet his team (before the penalty) were claiming he'd done nothing wrong... yet knew that he had, in essence they were well aware that they were trying to gain an unfair advantage, and they did. Had Lewis not overtaken the Safety Car when he did, he would've been 8th or 9th, not 2nd.
Therefore his actions gave him an unfair advantage, a penalty does
not change these facts.
And lets be honest here, it's not like McLaren don't have form in this particular area is it.
As was said post race, it was all sour grapes.
I bet it wouldn't have been if it was the other way around 'eh.
It would've been the usual, but erroneous, FIA favouring Ferrari nonsense.
Not cheating in any sense of the word.
Err, by definition it was actually. They attempted to gain an advantage by breaking the rules. And they did. How would you define it?
Hamilton hardly had time to consider whether passing the safety car was worth the subsequent penalty or not.
I sincerely hope he wasn't thinking like that. Then again, I wouldn't be at all surprised if he was... just look at
Liegate.
It's not his fault that the penalty was either not sufficient (maybe it should have been a ten second stop and go) or simply predetermined before the race.
Whether the penalty was sufficient or not is a different debate entirely. In this instance, both the process and the penalty were at fault. Namely, 1. the process to give the penalty took too long, meaning that 2, by the time the penalty was applied, it did not penalise the competitor sufficiently. This of course is not the fault of either Hamilton or McLaren. But this does not change the fact they gained unfairly by overtaking the Safety Car under waved yellows, and the teams subsequent denial of doing anything wrong.
but the fact that his drive-through didn't change his track position wasn't cheating by any interpretation I can think of.
Nor mine.
However... how do you interpret overtaking a Safety Car under waved yellows, an act that allowed him to retain 2nd, rather than dropping to 8th or 9th.
Do you think that is fair?
Wouldn't of he escaped a penalty if he floored it and passed before the safety car passed the line?
Yes... because he wouldn't have broken any rules, and no one would have an issue then. The problem was he passed the Safety Car when he shouldn't, have and gained unfairly from it.
But in all seriousness, the stewards have made some shocking decisions this season, it's all good and well having a different
celebrity steward at each race, but by doing say, there is then a inconsistency in the decision making process at each race.
For example, given the accident between Webb/Kov yesterday, one does wonder whether a reprimand was a suitable punishment for Hamilton after his weaving antics at Malaysia, or whether Schumacher receiving a 20 second post race penalty in Monaco for overtaking after the Safety Car line under green flag conditions was suitable, given a multitude of cars only received 5 second post race penalties after breaking the rules under Safety Car conditions yesterday.
Completely incomprehensible.